• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共同发表提高了 Cochrane 综述的传播,并使共同发表的期刊受益:一项回顾性队列研究。

Copublication improved the dissemination of Cochrane reviews and benefited copublishing journals: a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of International Medical Center/Ward of General Practice and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Sep;149:110-117. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.05.016. Epub 2022 May 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.05.016
PMID:35654265
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of copublication on the citation of Cochrane evidence.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

This was a retrospective cohort study including Cochrane reviews published up to 31 December 2015 and their citing up to 11 July 2021, identified from the Web of Science Core Collection database.

RESULTS

A total of 101 copublished and 202 noncopublished Cochrane reviews were included. The median for the total number of citations and the medians for the numbers of citations to the Cochrane review in the first, second, third, and fifth years after publication in the copublished group were higher than those in the noncopublished group [71 (interquartile range {IQR}: 37.5, 118.5) vs. 32.5 (13, 67); 1 (0, 3) vs. 0 (0, 1); 6 (3, 11.5) vs. 2 (1, 5); 8 (4, 15) vs. 3.5 (1, 8); 8 (4, 15) vs. 3 (1, 9), respectively, all P < 0.001]. Copublication of Cochrane reviews meant that 4 of 21 journals and 6 of 22 journals had a higher impact factor in the first and the second year after the copublication than they would have had without the copublication.

CONCLUSION

Copublication is associated with a higher citation frequency of Cochrane reviews and may increase the impact factor of the journal in which it is copublished. This facilitates broader application of Cochrane evidence and promotes its dissemination.

摘要

目的

评估共同发表对 Cochrane 证据引用的影响。

研究设计和设置

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了截至 2015 年 12 月 31 日发表的 Cochrane 综述及其截至 2021 年 7 月 11 日的引用情况,这些综述均来自 Web of Science 核心合集数据库。

结果

共纳入 101 篇共同发表和 202 篇非共同发表的 Cochrane 综述。共同发表组 Cochrane 综述的总引用数中位数及其发表后第 1、2、3、5 年的引用数中位数均高于非共同发表组[71(四分位距 {IQR}:37.5,118.5)比 32.5(13,67);1(0,3)比 0(0,1);6(3,11.5)比 2(1,5);8(4,15)比 3.5(1,8);8(4,15)比 3(1,9),均 P<0.001]。Cochrane 综述的共同发表意味着,在共同发表后的第 1 年和第 2 年,21 种期刊中有 4 种和 22 种期刊中的 6 种期刊的影响因子高于没有共同发表的情况。

结论

共同发表与 Cochrane 综述的引用频次较高相关,可能会增加共同发表期刊的影响因子。这有利于更广泛地应用 Cochrane 证据,并促进其传播。

相似文献

1
Copublication improved the dissemination of Cochrane reviews and benefited copublishing journals: a retrospective cohort study.共同发表提高了 Cochrane 综述的传播,并使共同发表的期刊受益:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Sep;149:110-117. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.05.016. Epub 2022 May 30.
2
Copublication promotes dissemination hypertension guidelines: a retrospective cohort study.共同发表促进高血压指南传播:一项回顾性队列研究。
Hypertens Res. 2024 Feb;47(2):416-426. doi: 10.1038/s41440-023-01470-0. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
3
Citation of updated and co-published Cochrane Methodology Reviews.引用更新的和共同发表的 Cochrane 方法学评论。
Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 14;12(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02270-w.
4
Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals.期刊声望、发表偏倚以及与同行评审期刊中已发表研究被引用相关的其他特征。
JAMA. 2002 Jun 5;287(21):2847-50. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.21.2847.
5
Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals.试验报告的统一标准(CONSORT)以及医学期刊上发表的随机对照试验(RCT)的报告完整性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):MR000030. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000030.pub2.
6
Adjusted Citation Rate, an Alternative Metric to Measure the Impact of General Radiology Journals.调整后的引证率:一种衡量普通放射学期刊影响力的替代指标
Acad Radiol. 2019 Aug;26(8):1087-1094. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
7
A systematic assessment of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in high-impact medical journals related to cancer.对Cochrane系统评价以及发表在高影响力医学期刊上的与癌症相关的系统评价进行的系统评估。
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 25;8(3):e020869. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020869.
8
The Most Influential Medical Journals According to Wikipedia: Quantitative Analysis.维基百科所评选的最具影响力医学期刊:定量分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 18;21(1):e11429. doi: 10.2196/11429.
9
A Bibliometric Analysis of Top-Cited Journal Articles in Obstetrics and Gynecology.妇产科高被引期刊文章的文献计量学分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1918007. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18007.
10
Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals.对发表在普通医学期刊上的文章在科学网、Scopus和谷歌学术中被引用情况的比较。
JAMA. 2009 Sep 9;302(10):1092-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1307.

引用本文的文献

1
Criteria adherence and citation impact of urologic Cochrane review co-publications.泌尿外科Cochrane系统评价共同发表文献的标准依从性和引用影响力。
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2023 Mar 27;1(2):e12004. doi: 10.1002/cesm.12004. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Quick prioritization of Cochrane reviews on benign conditions of the prostate.快速对关于前列腺良性疾病的Cochrane系统评价进行优先级排序。
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2023 Mar 27;1(2):e12002. doi: 10.1002/cesm.12002. eCollection 2023 Apr.
3
Copublication promotes dissemination hypertension guidelines: a retrospective cohort study.
共同发表促进高血压指南传播:一项回顾性队列研究。
Hypertens Res. 2024 Feb;47(2):416-426. doi: 10.1038/s41440-023-01470-0. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
4
Citation of updated and co-published Cochrane Methodology Reviews.引用更新的和共同发表的 Cochrane 方法学评论。
Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 14;12(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02270-w.