Department of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Department of Urology, Hakodate Koseiin Hakodate Goryoukaku Hospital, Hakodate, Japan.
Int J Urol. 2022 Sep;29(9):1010-1016. doi: 10.1111/iju.14941. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
To evaluate factors to predict overall survival of metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients treated with gemcitabine plus cisplatin chemotherapy or pembrolizumab therapy.
We retrospectively evaluated two metastatic urothelial carcinoma cohorts treated with (i) gemcitabine plus cisplatin or (ii) pembrolizumab. The gemcitabine plus cisplatin cohort was treated from December 2005 through December 2014 while the pembrolizumab cohort was treated from January 2018 through December 2020. Using multivariate analyses, we evaluated the risk factors for overall survival in each cohort and compared them. None of the gemcitabine plus cisplatin cohort patients were treated with pembrolizumab. All patients in the pembrolizumab cohort were treated with prior platinum-based chemotherapy.
There were 184 patients in the gemcitabine plus cisplatin cohort and 91 in the pembrolizumab cohort. The mean follow-up periods were 714 and 284 days, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the risk factors for overall survival in the gemcitabine plus cisplatin cohort were liver metastasis, worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (1 or more), no primary site resection, and a high prognostic index (1 or more). In the pembrolizumab cohort, liver metastasis, bone metastasis, and worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-performance status (1 or more), and high prognostic index (1 or more) were the risk factors for overall survival. In the pembrolizumab cohort, patients with a complete response or partial response during prior platinum-based chemotherapy had better overall survival with the following pembrolizumab treatment than those with stable or progressive disease (P = 0.004).
Considering the similarity of these risk factors in two sequential treatments, it may be possible to predict the response to pembrolizumab according to the response to prior chemotherapy.
评估吉西他滨联合顺铂化疗或帕博利珠单抗治疗转移性尿路上皮癌患者总生存期的预测因素。
我们回顾性评估了接受(i)吉西他滨联合顺铂或(ii)帕博利珠单抗治疗的 2 个转移性尿路上皮癌队列。吉西他滨联合顺铂队列的治疗时间为 2005 年 12 月至 2014 年 12 月,而帕博利珠单抗队列的治疗时间为 2018 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月。使用多变量分析,我们评估了每个队列中总生存期的风险因素,并对其进行了比较。吉西他滨联合顺铂队列中没有患者接受帕博利珠单抗治疗。帕博利珠单抗队列中的所有患者均接受了先前的含铂化疗。
吉西他滨联合顺铂队列中有 184 例患者,帕博利珠单抗队列中有 91 例患者。中位随访时间分别为 714 天和 284 天。多变量分析显示,吉西他滨联合顺铂队列中总生存期的风险因素为肝转移、东部合作肿瘤组表现状态(1 或更多)较差、无原发部位切除和高预后指数(1 或更多)。在帕博利珠单抗队列中,肝转移、骨转移和东部合作肿瘤组表现状态(1 或更多)较差,以及高预后指数(1 或更多)是总生存期的风险因素。在帕博利珠单抗队列中,在先前的含铂化疗期间获得完全缓解或部分缓解的患者在接受帕博利珠单抗治疗后总生存期优于病情稳定或进展的患者(P=0.004)。
考虑到两种连续治疗中这些风险因素的相似性,根据先前化疗的反应,有可能预测对帕博利珠单抗的反应。