Suppr超能文献

内脏动脉瘤覆膜支架腔内修复术治疗非感染性腹主动脉瘤的早期及中期疗效分析

Early and Midterm Results after Endovascular Repair of Non-infected Saccular Lesions of the Infrarenal Aorta.

机构信息

Vascular Surgery - University of Milan School of Medicine and Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Milan, Italy.

Vascular Surgery Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria School of Medicine, Varese, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2022 Jun;63(6):808-816. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.03.004. Epub 2022 Mar 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to report short and midterm outcomes of a cohort of consecutive patients treated by endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for saccular lesion of the abdominal aorta (sl-AA).

METHODS

This was a multicentre, retrospective, financially unsupported physician initiated, observational cohort study that involved tertiary referral from Italian hospitals. For this study, between January 2010 and December 2020, only those patients treated by EVAR for non-infected sl-AA, namely blister/ulcer like projection and/or penetrating aortic ulcer, were analysed. Primary outcomes of interest were overall survival and freedom from aorta related mortality (ARM).

RESULTS

The final cohort included 120 of 3 982 eligible aortic lesions. There were 103 (85.8%) males and 17 (14.2%) females. The median age was 76 years (interquartile range [IQR] 69, 80). Rupture on admission was observed in 10 (8.3%) cases. Early (≤ 30 days) death occurred in two (1.7%) patients. There were five (4.2%) complications requiring surgical re-intervention (iliac limb occlusion n = 4; groin haematoma, n = 1). The median duration of follow up was 20 months (IQR 4, 59.5): the estimated overall survival was 85.5% (standard error [SE] 0.035; 95% confidence interval [CI] 77.3 - 91.1) at 12 months, 78.7% (SE 0.044; 95% CI 69.0 - 86.0) at 36 months, and 74% (SE 0.050; 95% CI 63.2 - 82.5) at 60 months. Only one (0.8%) patient required aortic re-intervention during follow up because of a late endograft infection. The estimated freedom from ARM was 96% (SE 0.050; 95% CI 90.3 - 98.2) at 36 and 60 months. Cox's regression analysis identified that death was associated with age > 70 years (hazard ratio [HR] 1.10; 95% CI 1.04 - 1.17, p = .001), and coronary artery disease (HR 1.14; 95% CI 1.04 - 1.26, p = .006).

CONCLUSION

EVAR for sl-AA proved to be safe and effective. The mortality rate was low for a group of patients known to be at high risk from open repair, and EVAR remained stable with no ARM during midterm follow up, and an acceptably low 0.8% endograft related re-intervention rate.

摘要

目的

报告一组连续接受血管内主动脉修复(EVAR)治疗腹主动脉囊状病变(sl-AA)患者的短期和中期结果。

方法

这是一项多中心、回顾性、无资金支持的医生发起的观察性队列研究,涉及意大利医院的三级转诊。在这项研究中,2010 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间,仅对接受 EVAR 治疗非感染性 sl-AA(即疱状/溃疡样突起和/或穿透性主动脉溃疡)的患者进行了分析。主要观察终点为总生存率和免于主动脉相关死亡率(ARM)。

结果

最终纳入的队列包括 3982 个符合条件的主动脉病变中的 120 个。其中 103 例(85.8%)为男性,17 例(14.2%)为女性。中位年龄为 76 岁(四分位距 [IQR] 69,80)。入院时观察到破裂 10 例(8.3%)。早期(≤30 天)死亡发生在 2 例(1.7%)患者中。有 5 例(4.2%)需要手术再次干预的并发症(髂支闭塞 4 例;腹股沟血肿 1 例)。中位随访时间为 20 个月(IQR 4,59.5):12 个月时总生存率估计为 85.5%(标准误差 [SE] 0.035;95%置信区间 [CI] 77.3-91.1),36 个月时为 78.7%(SE 0.044;95% CI 69.0-86.0),60 个月时为 74%(SE 0.050;95% CI 63.2-82.5)。只有 1 例(0.8%)患者在随访期间因晚期移植物感染而需要再次主动脉干预。ARM 无事件生存率在 36 和 60 个月时分别为 96%(SE 0.050;95% CI 90.3-98.2)。Cox 回归分析发现,死亡与年龄>70 岁(危险比 [HR] 1.10;95% CI 1.04-1.17,p=0.001)和冠状动脉疾病(HR 1.14;95% CI 1.04-1.26,p=0.006)相关。

结论

EVAR 治疗 sl-AA 被证明是安全有效的。对于一组已知有开放修复高风险的患者,死亡率较低,EVAR 在中期随访期间保持稳定,ARM 为 0.8%,可接受的移植物相关再次干预率较低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验