Gutman Michael J, Joyce Christopher D, Patel Manan S, Lazarus Mark D, Horneff John G
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
University of Pennsylvania, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2022 Feb;10(2):160-165. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2021.54472.2718.
Multiple surgical techniques for fixation of Neer type IIB distal clavicle fractures have been described without consensus on optimal treatment. The purpose of this study is to compare functional and radiographic results with surgical management of Neer type IIB distal clavicle fractures at a single institution.
Sixty-three patients with acute Neer type IIB fractures treated operatively were evaluated. Patients with a minimum of two year follow up were included. Functional scores included American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and Likert patient satisfaction (1 to 5). Radiographs were assessed for osseous union and coracoclavicular (CC) distance.
Thirty-eight patients met inclusion with a mean follow-up of 5.3 years. Patients were divided into five groups based on fixation technique: suture-only CC fixation (n=6), CC screw fixation only (n=3), open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) without CC fixation (n=8), hook plate fixation (n=4), and ORIF with suture CC reconstruction (n=17). Outcome scores for the entire cohort were 91.8 for ASES, 90.2 for SANE, and 10.8 for STT. Patients with hook plates had significantly lower SANE score (p=0.016), but no other significant differences in functional, satisfaction, or radiographic outcomes were found between groups. Sixteen patients (42.1%) required reoperation.
Treatment of Neer type IIB fractures via suture- only fixation, plate-only fixation, or a combination of both demonstrated satisfactory mid to long term outcomes. While implant removal was more common in the CC screw and ORIF groups, no fixation technique proved functionally superior.
已描述了多种用于固定Neer IIB型锁骨远端骨折的手术技术,但对于最佳治疗方法尚无共识。本研究的目的是比较在单一机构中Neer IIB型锁骨远端骨折手术治疗后的功能和影像学结果。
对63例接受手术治疗的急性Neer IIB型骨折患者进行评估。纳入至少随访两年的患者。功能评分包括美国肩肘外科医师协会(ASES)评分、单评估数字评价(SANE)、简单肩部试验(SST)和李克特患者满意度(1至5)。评估X线片的骨愈合情况和喙锁(CC)间距。
38例患者符合纳入标准,平均随访5.3年。根据固定技术将患者分为五组:单纯缝线CC固定(n = 6)、单纯CC螺钉固定(n = 3)、无CC固定的切开复位内固定(ORIF)(n = 8)、钩钢板固定(n = 4)和带缝线CC重建的ORIF(n = 17)。整个队列的ASES评分为91.8,SANE评分为90.2,STT评分为10.8。钩钢板固定的患者SANE评分显著较低(p = 0.016),但各组之间在功能、满意度或影像学结果方面未发现其他显著差异。16例患者(42.1%)需要再次手术。
通过单纯缝线固定、单纯钢板固定或两者结合治疗Neer IIB型骨折显示出令人满意的中长期结果。虽然在CC螺钉和ORIF组中植入物取出更为常见,但没有一种固定技术在功能上被证明更优越。