Lang D J, Johns B L
Am J Physiol. 1987 Apr;252(4 Pt 2):H704-13. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1987.252.4.H704.
The purpose of this study was to compare the in vivo mechanical characteristics during venous pressure elevation of two sizes of venules in the intestinal muscularis of anesthetized Wistar rats. The two venules studied were the first-order venule (1V), ID = 71.2 +/- 3.3 microns [12] (means +/- SE [n]) and the small collecting vein (SCV), ID = 134.4 +/- 9.1 microns [12]. Vessel diameters and servonull pressures were measured as venous pressure was elevated with a snare about the vein of the isolated segment. The distension characteristics of the two vessels were significantly different, with the 1V evidencing greater strains (percent change from control diameter) and in vivo distensibilities [D = (delta lumen area/lumen area)/delta pressure] than the SCV at all pressure elevations above control. The 1V and SCV mean wall elastic moduli (calculated using Rhodin's measurements of venule control wall thickness) reflected these differences: the initial 1V wall Young's modulus was low and changed little during the vessel distension, whereas the SCV modulus was greater at control and increased sharply with strain in a nonlinear fashion. Although a portion of these differences can be attributed to different initial hoop wall stress levels, the SCV elastic modulus was significantly greater than the 1V modulus at comparable levels of wall stress. Both active and passive factors may contribute to these in vivo differences in elastic modulus, but this experiment does not distinguish between them.
本研究的目的是比较麻醉的Wistar大鼠肠肌层中两种尺寸微静脉在静脉压升高期间的体内力学特性。所研究的两条微静脉分别是一级微静脉(1V),内径=71.2±3.3微米[12](平均值±标准误[n])和小集合静脉(SCV),内径=134.4±9.1微米[12]。当用圈套器围绕分离节段的静脉升高静脉压时,测量血管直径和伺服零压力。在高于对照的所有压力升高情况下,两种血管的扩张特性存在显著差异,1V在应变(相对于对照直径的百分比变化)和体内扩张性[D =(管腔面积变化/管腔面积)/压力变化]方面均比SCV更大。1V和SCV的平均壁弹性模量(使用Rhodin对微静脉对照壁厚度的测量值计算)反映了这些差异:初始时1V壁的杨氏模量较低,在血管扩张过程中变化不大,而SCV的模量在对照时较大,并随着应变以非线性方式急剧增加。尽管这些差异部分可归因于不同的初始环向壁应力水平,但在相当的壁应力水平下,SCV的弹性模量明显大于1V的模量。主动和被动因素都可能导致这些弹性模量的体内差异,但本实验并未对它们进行区分。