• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

幼儿应该在性虐待案件中作证吗?

Should young children testify in cases of sexual abuse?

作者信息

Yates A

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 1987 Apr;144(4):476-80. doi: 10.1176/ajp.144.4.476.

DOI:10.1176/ajp.144.4.476
PMID:3565617
Abstract

Children as young as age 3 are testifying in cases of sexual abuse and molestation. Very young children can accurately recall emotionally charged, personally significant events. They demonstrate more errors of omission, difficulties with time and number of concepts, and occasional misinterpretations of others' actions. Children's testimony can be influenced by an overly authoritative or ingratiating attorney stance, an attorney's preconceived notions, age-inappropriate questions, and the child's limited attention span. Children may be helped or harmed by testifying. The risk of further traumatization can be minimized through the judge's use of discretionary power, inclusion of professionals trained in child development in the investigative and court process, and use of videotaping or one-way screens.

摘要

年仅3岁的儿童在性虐待和性骚扰案件中出庭作证。非常年幼的儿童能够准确回忆起充满情感、对个人意义重大的事件。他们表现出更多的遗漏错误、在时间和数字概念方面存在困难,以及偶尔对他人行为的误解。儿童的证词可能会受到律师过于权威或讨好的态度、律师的先入之见、不适合其年龄的问题以及儿童有限的注意力持续时间的影响。作证可能对儿童有帮助,也可能造成伤害。通过法官行使自由裁量权、在调查和法庭程序中纳入受过儿童发展培训的专业人员,以及使用录像或单向屏幕,可以将进一步受创伤的风险降至最低。

相似文献

1
Should young children testify in cases of sexual abuse?幼儿应该在性虐待案件中作证吗?
Am J Psychiatry. 1987 Apr;144(4):476-80. doi: 10.1176/ajp.144.4.476.
2
Child sexual abuse in Singapore with special reference to medico-legal implications: a review of 38 cases.新加坡的儿童性虐待及其法医学意义:38例病例回顾
Med Sci Law. 2003 Jul;43(3):260-6. doi: 10.1258/rsmmsl.43.3.260.
3
Testifying in criminal court: emotional effects on child sexual assault victims.在刑事法庭上作证:对儿童性侵犯受害者的情感影响。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1992;57(5):1-142; discussion 143-61.
4
The child as a witness.儿童作为证人。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1986 Dec;37(12):1225-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.37.12.1225.
5
The contribution of children's advocacy centers to felony prosecutions of child sexual abuse.儿童维权中心对儿童性虐待重罪起诉的贡献。
Child Abuse Negl. 2009 Jan;33(1):12-8. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.07.002. Epub 2009 Jan 23.
6
Child sexual abuse revisited by the U.S. Supreme Court.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1993 Sep;32(5):971-4. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199309000-00013.
7
Outcry Consistency and Prosecutorial Decisions in Child Sexual Abuse Cases.儿童性虐待案件中的公众强烈抗议一致性与检察决定
J Child Sex Abus. 2018 May-Jun;27(4):424-438. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2018.1474413. Epub 2018 May 18.
8
Adjudication of child sexual abuse cases.儿童性虐待案件的裁决
Future Child. 1994 Summer-Fall;4(2):84-101.
9
Which sexual abuse victims receive a forensic medical examination? The impact of Children's Advocacy Centers.哪些性虐待受害者接受了法医检查?儿童权益保护中心的影响。
Child Abuse Negl. 2007 Oct;31(10):1053-68. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.04.006. Epub 2007 Nov 8.
10
Expert testimony regarding child witnesses: does it sensitize jurors to forensic interview quality?专家证言在儿童证人案件中的作用:其是否能使陪审员更加关注法医访谈质量?
Law Hum Behav. 2011 Apr;35(2):152-64. doi: 10.1007/s10979-010-9228-2.