School of Kinesiology and Physical Therapy, College of Health Professions and Sciences, University of Central Florida, Orlando.
Pain Research and Intervention Center of Excellence.
Clin J Pain. 2022 Jul 1;38(7):451-458. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001048.
Pain sensitivity and the brain structure are critical in modulating pain and may contribute to the maintenance of pain in older adults. However, a paucity of evidence exists investigating the link between pain sensitivity and brain morphometry in older adults. The purpose of the study was to identify pain sensitivity profiles in healthy, community-dwelling older adults using a multimodal quantitative sensory testing protocol and to differentiate profiles based on brain morphometry.
This study was a secondary analysis of the Neuromodulatory Examination of Pain and Mobility Across the Lifespan (NEPAL) study. Participants completed demographic and psychological questionnaires, quantitative sensory testing, and a neuroimaging session. A Principal Component Analysis with Varimax rotation followed by hierarchical cluster analysis identified 4 pain sensitivity clusters (the "pain clusters").
Sixty-two older adults ranging from 60 to 94 years old without a specific pain condition (mean [SD] age=71.44 [6.69] y, 66.1% female) were analyzed. Four pain clusters were identified characterized by (1) thermal pain insensitivity; (2) high pinprick pain ratings and pressure pain insensitivity; (3) high thermal pain ratings and high temporal summation; and (4) thermal pain sensitivity, low thermal pain ratings, and low mechanical temporal summation. Sex differences were observed between pain clusters. Pain clusters 2 and 4 were distinguished by differences in the brain cortical volume in the parieto-occipital region.
While sufficient evidence exists demonstrating pain sensitivity profiles in younger individuals and in those with chronic pain conditions, the finding that subgroups of experimental pain sensitivity also exist in healthy older adults is novel. Identifying these factors in older adults may help differentiate the underlying mechanisms contributing to pain and aging.
疼痛敏感性和大脑结构在调节疼痛方面至关重要,可能有助于老年人疼痛的持续存在。然而,目前关于疼痛敏感性与老年人大脑形态之间的联系的证据有限。本研究的目的是使用多模态定量感觉测试方案在健康的社区居住的老年人中确定疼痛敏感性特征,并根据大脑形态学对这些特征进行区分。
这是神经调节性疼痛和移动性跨生命周期检查(NEPAL)研究的二次分析。参与者完成了人口统计学和心理学问卷、定量感觉测试和神经影像学检查。主成分分析与 Varimax 旋转 followed by hierarchical cluster analysis 确定了 4 个疼痛敏感性聚类(“疼痛聚类”)。
分析了 62 名年龄在 60 至 94 岁之间、没有特定疼痛状况的老年人(平均[标准差]年龄=71.44[6.69]岁,66.1%为女性)。确定了 4 个疼痛聚类,其特征分别为:(1)热痛感觉迟钝;(2)针刺痛觉评分高且压力痛感觉迟钝;(3)热痛觉评分高且时间总和高;以及(4)热痛觉敏感、热痛觉评分低且机械时间总和低。在疼痛聚类之间观察到了性别差异。疼痛聚类 2 和 4 可通过顶枕部大脑皮质体积的差异来区分。
虽然有足够的证据表明在年轻个体和慢性疼痛患者中存在疼痛敏感性特征,但在健康的老年个体中也存在实验性疼痛敏感性亚组这一发现是新颖的。在老年人中识别这些因素可能有助于区分导致疼痛和衰老的潜在机制。