• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童鼻咽温度探头的目标插入深度:一项分析磁共振图像的前瞻性观察研究。

Target insertion depth of nasopharyngeal temperature probes in children: A prospective observational study analyzing magnetic resonance images.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.

Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.

出版信息

Paediatr Anaesth. 2022 Sep;32(9):1054-1061. doi: 10.1111/pan.14504. Epub 2022 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1111/pan.14504
PMID:35656935
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Core temperature monitoring is indispensable to prevent children from perioperative thermal perturbations. Although nasopharyngeal measurements are commonly used in anesthesia and considered to reflect core temperature accurately, standardized target depths for probe insertion are unknown in children.

AIMS

Our primary goal was to determine a target depth of nasopharyngeal temperature probe insertion in children by measuring distances on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Secondary aims were to correlate these measurements with biometric variables and facial landmark-distances to derive formulas estimating target depth.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study in children ≤12 years undergoing cranial MRI with anesthesia. We documented patient characteristics and measured the landmark-distances nostril-mandible, nostril-tragus, and philtrum-tragus on patient's faces. On MRI, the target point for the probe tip was considered to be the site of the nasopharyngeal mucosa with the closest proximity to the internal carotid artery. After its determination in the transverse axis and triangulation to the sagittal axis, we measured the distance to the nostril. This distance, defined as target insertion depth, was correlated with the patient characteristics and used for univariate and multiple linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty children with a mean age of 4.5 years were included. The target insertion depth ranged from 61.8 mm in infants to 89.8 mm in 12-year-old children. Height correlated best (ρ = 0.685, 95%-CI: [0.57-0.77]). The best-fit estimation in millimeters, "40.8 + height [cm] × 0.32,″ would lead to a placement in the target position in 67% of cases. A simplified approach by categories of 50-80, 80-110, 110-130, and >130 cm height with target insertion depths of 60, 70, 80, and 85 mm, respectively, achieved similar probabilities.

CONCLUSIONS

Height-based formulas could be a valuable proxy for the insertion depth of nasopharyngeal temperature probes. Further clinical trials are necessary to investigate their measurement accuracy.

摘要

背景

核心体温监测对于预防儿童围手术期体温波动至关重要。尽管鼻咽测量在麻醉中被广泛应用,并且被认为能准确反映核心体温,但在儿童中,探头插入的标准化目标深度尚不清楚。

目的

我们的主要目标是通过磁共振成像(MRI)测量来确定儿童鼻咽温度探头插入的目标深度。次要目标是将这些测量值与生物测量变量和面部标志距离相关联,以推导出估计目标深度的公式。

方法

我们进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,纳入了 12 岁以下接受头部 MRI 检查并接受麻醉的儿童。我们记录了患者的特征,并测量了患者面部上的鼻孔-下颌、鼻孔-耳屏和人中-耳屏的标志距离。在 MRI 上,探头尖端的目标点被认为是与颈内动脉最接近的鼻咽黏膜部位。在确定了横轴上的目标点位置并与矢状轴进行三角测量后,我们测量了到鼻孔的距离。这个距离被定义为目标插入深度,与患者的特征相关联,并用于单变量和多元线性回归分析。

结果

共纳入 120 名平均年龄为 4.5 岁的儿童。目标插入深度范围从婴儿的 61.8 毫米到 12 岁儿童的 89.8 毫米。身高相关性最好(ρ=0.685,95%置信区间:[0.57-0.77])。最佳拟合毫米数的估计值为“40.8+身高[cm]×0.32”,将探头放置在目标位置的概率为 67%。通过身高分为 50-80、80-110、110-130 和>130cm 三个类别,目标插入深度分别为 60、70、80 和 85mm 的简化方法,也能达到相似的概率。

结论

基于身高的公式可以作为鼻咽温度探头插入深度的有价值替代指标。还需要进一步的临床试验来研究其测量准确性。

相似文献

1
Target insertion depth of nasopharyngeal temperature probes in children: A prospective observational study analyzing magnetic resonance images.儿童鼻咽温度探头的目标插入深度:一项分析磁共振图像的前瞻性观察研究。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2022 Sep;32(9):1054-1061. doi: 10.1111/pan.14504. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
2
Working with estimation-formulas to predict nasopharyngeal airway insertion depth in children: Looking at magnetic resonance images - A prospective observational study (WEND:LI-Study).利用估测公式预测儿童鼻咽气道插入深度:磁共振成像研究-前瞻性观察研究(WEND:LI-Study)。
Resuscitation. 2021 Nov;168:95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.09.024. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
3
A method for optimal depth of the nasopharyngeal temperature probe: the philtrum to tragus distance.一种测量鼻咽温度探头深度的最佳方法:人中到耳屏的距离。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2014 Mar;66(3):195-8. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2014.66.3.195. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
4
Optimal Positioning of Nasopharyngeal Temperature Probes in Infants and Children: A Prospective Cohort Study.婴儿和儿童鼻咽温度探头的最佳放置位置:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Anesth Analg. 2023 May 1;136(5):986-991. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006312. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
5
Optimal nasopharyngeal temperature probe placement.最佳鼻咽温度探头放置位置。
Anesth Analg. 2014 Oct;119(4):875-879. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000361.
6
Estimation of nares-to-epiglottis distance for selecting an appropriate nasopharyngeal airway.估算鼻孔至会厌的距离以选择合适的鼻咽通气道。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Mar;98(10):e14832. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014832.
7
Comparison of Nasopharyngeal Temperature Measured at Fossa of Rosenmuller and Blindly Inserted Temperature Probe with Esophageal Temperature: A Cross-Sectional Study.在咽隐窝测量的鼻咽温度与盲插温度探头测量的鼻咽温度与食管温度的比较:一项横断面研究。
Anesth Essays Res. 2018 Apr-Jun;12(2):506-511. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_47_18.
8
Methodological investigation of measuring nasopharyngeal temperature as noninvasive brain temperature analogue in the neonate.
Intensive Care Med. 2001 Apr;27(4):736-42. doi: 10.1007/s001340000829.
9
Simple calculation of the optimal insertion depth of esophageal temperature probes in children.小儿食管温度探头最佳插入深度的简易计算。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2020 Apr;34(2):353-359. doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00327-7. Epub 2019 May 29.
10
Determination of insertion depth of flexible laryngeal mask airway in pediatric population-A prospective observational study.小儿群体中可弯曲喉罩气道插入深度的测定——一项前瞻性观察性研究。
J Clin Anesth. 2017 Feb;36:76-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.10.012. Epub 2016 Nov 29.