• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胺碘酮在持续性左心室辅助装置患者中的应用与全因死亡率。

Amiodarone Use and All-Cause Mortality in Patients With a Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device.

机构信息

Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute Overland Park KS.

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery University of Louisville Louisville KY.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jun 7;11(11):e023762. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023762. Epub 2022 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.121.023762
PMID:35656998
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9238747/
Abstract

Background Atrial and ventricular arrhythmias are commonly encountered in patients with advanced heart failure, with amiodarone being the most commonly used antiarrhythmic drug in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) recipients. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of amiodarone use on long-term all-cause mortality in ptients with a CF-LVAD. Methods and Results A retrospective multicenter study of CF-LVAD was conducted at 5 centers including all CF-LVAD implants from 2007 to 2015. Patients were stratified based on pre-CF-LVAD implant amiodarone use. Additional use of amiodarone after CF-LVAD implantation was also evaluated. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality during long-term follow-up. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess survival outcomes. Multivariable Cox regression was used to identify predictors of outcomes. Propensity matching was done to address baseline differences. A total of 480 patients with a CF-LVAD (aged 58±13 years, 81% men) were included. Of these, 170 (35.4%) were on chronic amiodarone therapy at the time of CF-LVAD implant, and 310 (64.6%) were not on amiodarone. Rate of all-cause mortality over the follow-up period was 32.9% in the amiodarone group compared with 29.6% in those not on amiodarone (=0.008). Similar results were noted in the propensity-matched group (log-rank, =0.04). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, amiodarone use at baseline was independently associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.1-2.5]; =0.01). Conclusions Amiodarone use was associated with significantly increased rates of all-cause mortality in CF-LVAD recipients. Earlier interventions for arrhythmias to avoid long-term amiodarone exposure may improve long-term outcomes in CF-LVAD recipients and needs further study.

摘要

背景

在晚期心力衰竭患者中,常出现心房和心室心律失常,胺碘酮是连续流左心室辅助装置(CF-LVAD)受者中最常用的抗心律失常药物。本研究旨在评估 CF-LVAD 患者使用胺碘酮对长期全因死亡率的影响。

方法和结果

在 5 个中心进行了回顾性多中心 CF-LVAD 研究,纳入了 2007 年至 2015 年所有 CF-LVAD 植入患者。根据 CF-LVAD 植入前胺碘酮的使用情况对患者进行分层。还评估了 CF-LVAD 植入后胺碘酮的额外使用。主要结局是长期随访期间的全因死亡率。使用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线评估生存结果。使用多变量 Cox 回归确定结局的预测因素。进行倾向匹配以解决基线差异。共纳入 480 例 CF-LVAD 患者(年龄 58±13 岁,81%为男性)。其中,170 例(35.4%)在 CF-LVAD 植入时接受慢性胺碘酮治疗,310 例(64.6%)未接受胺碘酮治疗。随访期间全因死亡率在胺碘酮组为 32.9%,未用胺碘酮组为 29.6%(=0.008)。在倾向匹配组中也观察到类似结果(对数秩检验,=0.04)。多变量 Cox 回归分析显示,基线时使用胺碘酮与全因死亡率独立相关(危险比,1.68[95%CI,1.1-2.5];=0.01)。

结论

胺碘酮的使用与 CF-LVAD 受者全因死亡率的显著增加相关。早期干预心律失常以避免长期暴露于胺碘酮可能改善 CF-LVAD 受者的长期预后,需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c6c/9238747/27a48f8dc41d/JAH3-11-e023762-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c6c/9238747/6fa112f6ff4e/JAH3-11-e023762-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c6c/9238747/f4bb5ec9aaf4/JAH3-11-e023762-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c6c/9238747/27a48f8dc41d/JAH3-11-e023762-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c6c/9238747/6fa112f6ff4e/JAH3-11-e023762-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c6c/9238747/f4bb5ec9aaf4/JAH3-11-e023762-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c6c/9238747/27a48f8dc41d/JAH3-11-e023762-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Amiodarone Use and All-Cause Mortality in Patients With a Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device.胺碘酮在持续性左心室辅助装置患者中的应用与全因死亡率。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jun 7;11(11):e023762. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023762. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
2
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Clinical Outcomes in Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients.心脏再同步治疗与连续血流左心室辅助装置受者的临床结局。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jun 15;7(12):e009091. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009091.
3
Impact of QRS Duration and Ventricular Pacing on Clinical and Arrhythmic Outcomes in Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients: A Multicenter Study.连续血流左心室辅助装置受者 QRS 持续时间和心室起搏对临床和心律失常结局的影响:一项多中心研究。
J Card Fail. 2019 May;25(5):355-363. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.02.013. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
4
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with ventricular arrhythmias after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implant.连续血流左心室辅助装置植入术后室性心律失常患者的临床特征和转归。
Artif Organs. 2022 Aug;46(8):1608-1615. doi: 10.1111/aor.14234. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
5
A prospective comparison of mid-term outcomes in patients treated with heart transplantation with advanced age donors versus left ventricular assist device implantation.接受高龄供体心脏移植患者与接受左心室辅助装置植入患者中期结局的前瞻性比较。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Oct;23(4):584-92. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw164. Epub 2016 May 30.
6
Impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy on clinical outcomes in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.心脏再同步治疗对持续血流左心室辅助装置患者临床结局的影响。
J Card Fail. 2015 Mar;21(3):226-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2014.12.006. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
7
Ventricular arrhythmias following continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation: A systematic review.连续血流左心室辅助装置植入术后的室性心律失常:系统评价。
Artif Organs. 2020 Aug;44(8):E313-E325. doi: 10.1111/aor.13665. Epub 2020 Mar 8.
8
Left Ventricular Assist Device Thrombosis-Amiodarone-Induced Hyperthyroidism: Causal Link?左心室辅助装置血栓形成-胺碘酮诱导的甲状腺功能亢进:因果关系?
ASAIO J. 2019 Feb;65(2):e18-e20. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000773.
9
Predictors and Clinical Impact of Late Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.连续血流左心室辅助装置患者迟发性室性心律失常的预测因素和临床影响。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Sep;4(9):1166-1175. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.05.006. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
10
Competing Risks to Transplant in Bridging With Continuous-flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.连续血流左心室辅助装置桥接中的移植竞争风险。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Oct;114(4):1276-1283. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.09.079. Epub 2021 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug therapy and catheter ablation for management of arrhythmias in continuous flow left ventricular assist device's patients: a Clinical Consensus Statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Failure Association of the ESC.药物治疗和导管消融治疗持续血流左心室辅助装置患者心律失常:欧洲心律协会和欧洲心脏病学会心力衰竭协会的临床共识声明。
Europace. 2024 Nov 1;26(11). doi: 10.1093/europace/euae272.
2
Ventricular arrhythmias prior to continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation were not associated with reduced 1-year mortality: a single-center experience.连续血流左心室辅助装置植入术前的室性心律失常与1年死亡率降低无关:一项单中心经验。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 Jun;67(4):705-707. doi: 10.1007/s10840-023-01698-3. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Managing Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者心房颤动的管理:美国心脏协会的科学声明
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2021 Jun;14(6):HAE0000000000000078. doi: 10.1161/HAE.0000000000000078. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
2
Device Therapy and Arrhythmia Management in Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.左心室辅助装置受者的器械治疗和心律失常管理:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circulation. 2019 May 14;139(20):e967-e989. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000673.
3
Open-chest epicardial ablation of ventricular tachycardia during a left ventricular assist device implantation: a case report.在植入左心室辅助装置期间进行开胸心外膜室性心动过速消融术:一例报告
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2023 Jun 23;7(7):ytad277. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytad277. eCollection 2023 Jul.
4
Association between amiodarone and ventricular tachycardia after left ventricular assist device implant: a single-center experience.胺碘酮与左心室辅助装置植入术后室性心动过速之间的关联:单中心经验
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 Aug;66(5):1265-1267. doi: 10.1007/s10840-022-01401-y. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
Effect of Catheter Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy on Mortality, Stroke, Bleeding, and Cardiac Arrest Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: The CABANA Randomized Clinical Trial.
导管消融与抗心律失常药物治疗对心房颤动患者死亡率、卒中和出血及心搏骤停的影响:CABANA 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Apr 2;321(13):1261-1274. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.0693.
4
Factors Associated With Prolonged Survival in Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients.与左心室辅助装置受体生存时间延长相关的因素。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Feb;107(2):519-526. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.08.054. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
5
Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation with Heart Failure.心力衰竭合并心房颤动的导管消融治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 1;378(5):417-427. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1707855.
6
Arrhythmias after left ventricular assist device implantation: Incidence and management.左心室辅助装置植入术后心律失常:发生率与处理。
Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2018 Jan;28(1):41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
7
Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Severe Heart Failure: An International Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Center Collaboration Analysis.严重心力衰竭中心律失常消融术:国际心律失常消融中心协作分析。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017 Jan;10(1). doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004494.
8
Amiodarone use in patients listed for heart transplant is associated with increased 1-year post-transplant mortality.在等待心脏移植的患者中使用胺碘酮与移植后1年死亡率增加有关。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 Feb;36(2):202-210. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.07.009. Epub 2016 Jul 17.
9
Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation versus Escalation of Antiarrhythmic Drugs.室性心动过速消融与抗心律失常药物升级。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 14;375(2):111-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513614. Epub 2016 May 5.
10
Ventricular arrhythmias after left ventricular assist device.左心室辅助装置植入后的室性心律失常
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Jun;6(3):648-54. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000113.