• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保留系带动脉的三种包皮环切术(FAP)、Plastibell装置(PD)和系带动脉结扎术(FAL)后的尿道口狭窄:长期随访

Meatal stenosis following three types of circumcision with frenular artery preservation (FAP), the Plastibell device (PD), and frenular artery ligation (FAL): a long-term follow-up.

作者信息

Shokri Varniab Zahra, Pourabhari Langroudi Ashkan, Neishabouri Afarin, Torabinavid Parham, Arbab Mona, Heidari Firouzeh, Milani Seyed Mohammad, Eftekharzadeh Sahar, Sabetkish Shabnam, Kajbafzadeh Abdol-Mohammad

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Urology and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Children's Medical Center, Pediatric Center of Excellence, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2023 Apr;192(2):707-711. doi: 10.1007/s11845-022-03040-8. Epub 2022 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1007/s11845-022-03040-8
PMID:35657540
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the simplicity of male circumcision, complications occur frequently. Post-circumcision meatal stenosis is a concerning complication that might require several interventions.

AIM

This study aims to evaluate the incidence of meatal stenosis in long-term follow-up, following three common circumcision methods: frenular artery preservation, frenular ligation, and the Plastibell device.

METHODS

This study is the continuation of the previous randomized clinical trial, the preliminary abstract of which has been accepted in the annual meeting of the American Urological Association in 2011. However, in this paper, we only included the patients with results of long-term follow-up. Patients were followed for a median of 11 years (range, 7-17). Follow-ups were recorded by evaluation of meatus and signs and symptoms of meatal stenosis.

RESULTS

Two hundred six boys (80 neonates and 126 non-neonates) at the time of procedure were included in this study. The circumcision was conducted on 23.3% (48/206) of boys with the Plastibell device (PD) and 39.3% (81/206) of cases with frenular artery preservation (FAP) and 37.4% (77/206) of cases with frenular artery ligation (FAL). Meatal stenosis presented in 13 children during follow-up. Considering the three methods of circumcision, a significant difference in the incidence of meatal stenosis among the types of circumcisions was observed (6.3% in PD and 1.2% in FAP, 11.7% in FAL, P = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

The present study revealed that the technique preserving the frenular artery is associated with a significantly lower incidence of meatal stenosis. Hence, the FAP is the recommended technique for circumcision as compared to two other methods.

摘要

背景

尽管男性包皮环切术操作简单,但并发症却经常发生。包皮环切术后尿道口狭窄是一种令人担忧的并发症,可能需要多次干预。

目的

本研究旨在评估三种常见包皮环切术(保留系带动脉、系带结扎和包皮环套术)在长期随访中尿道口狭窄的发生率。

方法

本研究是之前随机临床试验的延续,其初步摘要已于2011年在美国泌尿外科学会年会上被接受。然而,在本文中,我们仅纳入了有长期随访结果的患者。患者的中位随访时间为11年(范围7 - 17年)。通过评估尿道口以及尿道口狭窄的体征和症状来记录随访情况。

结果

本研究纳入了206名手术时的男孩(80名新生儿和126名非新生儿)。采用包皮环套术(PD)的男孩占23.3%(48/206),采用保留系带动脉(FAP)的病例占39.3%(81/206),采用系带结扎(FAL)的病例占37.4%(77/206)。随访期间有13名儿童出现尿道口狭窄。考虑到三种包皮环切方法,观察到不同类型包皮环切术在尿道口狭窄发生率上存在显著差异(PD组为6.3%,FAP组为1.2%,FAL组为11.7%,P = 0.026)。

结论

本研究表明,保留系带动脉的技术与显著更低的尿道口狭窄发生率相关。因此,与其他两种方法相比,FAP是推荐的包皮环切技术。

相似文献

1
Meatal stenosis following three types of circumcision with frenular artery preservation (FAP), the Plastibell device (PD), and frenular artery ligation (FAL): a long-term follow-up.保留系带动脉的三种包皮环切术(FAP)、Plastibell装置(PD)和系带动脉结扎术(FAL)后的尿道口狭窄:长期随访
Ir J Med Sci. 2023 Apr;192(2):707-711. doi: 10.1007/s11845-022-03040-8. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
2
Clinical presentation and pathophysiology of meatal stenosis following circumcision.包皮环切术后尿道口狭窄的临床表现及病理生理学
Br J Urol. 1995 Jan;75(1):91-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1995.tb07242.x.
3
Is frenuloplasty a risk factor for post-circumcision meatal stenosis?包皮系带成形术是否会增加包皮环切术后尿道狭窄的风险?
J Pediatr Urol. 2022 Jun;18(3):343.e1-343.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.03.024. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
4
Wedge urethral meatotomy in meatal stenosis secondary to web formation.后唇状尿道肉阜切开术治疗因融合性尿道下裂所致的尿道外口狭窄。
J Pediatr Urol. 2022 Jun;18(3):334.e1-334.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.02.022. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
5
Complication of newborn circumcision: Meatal stenosis or meatal web?新生儿包皮环切术并发症:尿道口狭窄还是尿道下裂?
J Pediatr Urol. 2017 Dec;13(6):617.e1-617.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
6
Are mechanical and chemical trauma the reason of meatal stenosis after newborn circumcision?机械性和化学性创伤是否是新生儿行包皮环切术后发生尿道狭窄的原因?
Eur J Pediatr. 2019 Jan;178(1):77-80. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3261-4. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
7
Incidence of meatal stenosis following neonatal circumcision in a primary care setting.基层医疗环境中新生儿包皮环切术后尿道口狭窄的发生率。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2006 Jan-Feb;45(1):49-54. doi: 10.1177/000992280604500108.
8
Cultural background, non-therapeutic circumcision and the risk of meatal stenosis and other urethral stricture disease: Two nationwide register-based cohort studies in Denmark 1977-2013.文化背景、非治疗性包皮环切术与尿道口狭窄及其他尿道狭窄疾病的风险:丹麦1977 - 2013年两项基于全国登记处的队列研究
Surgeon. 2018 Apr;16(2):107-118. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2016.11.002. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
9
Assessment of meatal stenosis in neonates undergoing circumcision using Plastibell Device with two different techniques.使用Plastibell装置采用两种不同技术对接受包皮环切术的新生儿尿道口狭窄进行评估。
Res Rep Urol. 2018 Sep 27;10:113-115. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S171292. eCollection 2018.
10
Post circumcision meatal stenosis: 12 years' experience.包皮环切术后尿道口狭窄:12年经验
N Z Med J. 1998 Feb 27;111(1060):57-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison the Diameter of the Urethral Meatus Before and After Circumcision and Evaluation of Urethral Stenosis.包皮环切术后尿道口直径比较及尿道狭窄评估
Glob Pediatr Health. 2024 Mar 7;11:2333794X241237059. doi: 10.1177/2333794X241237059. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Meatal stenosis: getting the diagnosis right.尿道口狭窄:正确诊断
Res Rep Urol. 2018 Dec 3;10:237-239. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S192310. eCollection 2018.
2
Assessment of meatal stenosis in neonates undergoing circumcision using Plastibell Device with two different techniques.使用Plastibell装置采用两种不同技术对接受包皮环切术的新生儿尿道口狭窄进行评估。
Res Rep Urol. 2018 Sep 27;10:113-115. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S171292. eCollection 2018.
3
Are mechanical and chemical trauma the reason of meatal stenosis after newborn circumcision?
机械性和化学性创伤是否是新生儿行包皮环切术后发生尿道狭窄的原因?
Eur J Pediatr. 2019 Jan;178(1):77-80. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3261-4. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
4
Does Circumcision Increase Meatal Stenosis Risk?-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.包皮环切术会增加尿道口狭窄风险吗?——一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Urology. 2017 Dec;110:16-26. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.07.027. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
5
The mobile technology era: Potential benefits in pediatric urology.移动技术时代:小儿泌尿外科的潜在益处。
J Pediatr Urol. 2017 Oct;13(5):529-530. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
6
Estimation of country-specific and global prevalence of male circumcision.特定国家和全球男性包皮环切术流行率的估计。
Popul Health Metr. 2016 Mar 1;14:4. doi: 10.1186/s12963-016-0073-5. eCollection 2016.
7
The 2010 Royal Australasian College of Physicians' policy statement 'Circumcision of infant males' is not evidence based.2010 年澳大利亚皇家内科医学院政策声明“男婴割礼”没有循证医学证据。
Intern Med J. 2012 Jul;42(7):822-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2012.02823.x.
8
Tailored sutureless meatoplasty: a new technique for correcting meatal stenosis.定制化无缝线尿道成形术:一种治疗尿道狭窄的新技术。
J Pediatr Urol. 2012 Feb;8(1):92-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.10.002. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
9
Incidence of asymptomatic meatal stenosis in children following neonatal circumcision.新生儿割礼后儿童无症状尿道狭窄的发生率。
J Pediatr Urol. 2011 Oct;7(5):526-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.08.005. Epub 2010 Sep 18.
10
Complications of circumcision in male neonates, infants and children: a systematic review.男性新生儿、婴儿和儿童包皮环切术的并发症:系统评价。
BMC Urol. 2010 Feb 16;10:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-10-2.