Zhang D M, Wang Y L, Liu W W, Xu L Y, Chen S M
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhengzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China.
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2022 May 25;57(5):339-345. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20220321-00180.
To establish a scoring scale for trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC), to explore the evaluation ability of this scoring scale for vaginal delivery after cesarean section (VBAC), and to improve the success rate of TOLAC. The delivery information of 661 TOLAC pregnant women admitted to Zhengzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University from 2014 to 2017 was retrospectively analyzed, and the TOLAC scoring scale was established by referring to relevant literatures. A prospective cohort study of pregnant women with TOLAC from January 2018 to December 2019 in Zhengzhou Central Hospital was conducted, including 440 pregnant women who were excluded from contraindications in trial labor. According to TOLAC scoring scale, pregnant women were divided into 3 groups, 0-6 group (94 cases), 7-9 group (234 cases) and 10-15 group (112 cases). The success rate of trial labor, failure reasons and incidence of maternal and neonatal complications were compared among the three groups. (1) The overall success rate of TOLAC in 440 pregnant women was 75.0% (330/440). The success rates of 0-6, 7-9 and 10-15 groups were 53.2% (50/94), 76.9% (180/234) and 89.3% (100/112), respectively. The success rate of 10-15 group were significantly higher than those of 0-6 and 7-9 groups (all <0.05). (2) Among the causes of trial labor failure, there were statistically significant differences between the three groups in terms of threatened uterine rupture and maternal abandonment (all <0.05). Pairings showed that the incidences of threatened uterine rupture and maternal abandonment in 0-6 group was lower than those in 7-9 and 10-15 groups, and the differences were statistically significant (all <0.05). (3) Maternal and neonatal complications mainly included postpartum hemorrhage and neonatal asphyxia, but there were no significant difference in the incidence of TOLAC success or failure among the three groups (all >0.05). There was no uterine rupture in all groups. (4) The main factors affecting TOLAC score of pregnant women in the three groups included natural labor, estimated weight of the fetus at this time, Bishop score of the cervix at admission and gestational age, and the scores of the above indexes in 10-15 group were significantly higher than those in 0-6 group and 7-9 group (all 0.05). TOLAC scoring scale has more accurate evaluation ability for VBAC, which could improve the success rate of TOLAC and maternal and child safety. The score of 0-6 is not recommended for vaginal trial labor, the score of 7-9 is recommended for vaginal trial labor, and the score of 10-15 is strongly recommended for vaginal trial labor.
建立剖宫产术后阴道试产(TOLAC)评分量表,探讨该评分量表对剖宫产术后阴道分娩(VBAC)的评估能力,提高TOLAC成功率。回顾性分析2014年至2017年郑州大学附属郑州中心医院收治的661例TOLAC孕妇的分娩信息,并参考相关文献建立TOLAC评分量表。对2018年1月至2019年12月郑州中心医院TOLAC孕妇进行前瞻性队列研究,其中440例孕妇排除试产禁忌证。根据TOLAC评分量表将孕妇分为3组,0 - 6分组(94例)、7 - 9分组(234例)和10 - 15分组(112例)。比较三组试产成功率、失败原因及母婴并发症发生率。(1)440例孕妇TOLAC总体成功率为75.0%(330/440)。0 - 6分组、7 - 9分组和10 - 15分组成功率分别为53.2%(50/94)、76.9%(180/234)和89.3%(100/112)。10 - 15分组成功率显著高于0 - 6分组和7 - 9分组(均P<0.05)。(2)试产失败原因中,三组在先兆子宫破裂和产妇放弃方面差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。两两比较显示,0 - 6分组先兆子宫破裂和产妇放弃发生率低于7 - 9分组和10 - 15分组,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。(3)母婴并发症主要包括产后出血和新生儿窒息,但三组TOLAC成功或失败发生率差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。所有组均无子宫破裂发生。(4)三组影响孕妇TOLAC评分的主要因素包括自然分娩、此时胎儿估计体重、入院时宫颈Bishop评分及孕周,10 - 15分组上述指标评分显著高于0 - 6分组和7 - 9分组(均P<0.05)。TOLAC评分量表对VBAC有更准确的评估能力,可提高TOLAC成功率及母婴安全性。不建议0 - 6分进行阴道试产,建议7 - 9分进行阴道试产,强烈建议10 - 15分进行阴道试产。