• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝内胆管结石的安全性和疗效评估:倾向评分匹配分析]

[Safety and efficacy evaluation of laparoscopic and open hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis: a propensity score matched analysis].

作者信息

Huang X J, He Y, He L, Feng Y J, Yang G, Xiong Y F, Li J D

机构信息

The First Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery,Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College,Institute of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic-Intestinal Disease,North Sichuan Medical College,Nanchong 637000, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 1;60(6):593-598. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20211212-00594.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20211212-00594
PMID:35658348
Abstract

To compare the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic and open hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis. Between January 2014 and May 2020, the clinicopathological data of 254 patients with hepatolithiasis who underwent laparoscopic or open hepatectomy at the First Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery,Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College were collected retrospectively. There were 74 males and 180 females with age of (56±8) years (range: 38 to 77 years). Of the 254 patients, 162 underwent laparoscopic surgery (laparoscopic group) and 92 underwent open surgery (open group). Propensity score matching(PSM) was performed to match baseline characteristics of the two groups,and then the perioperative results and follow-up efficacy were compared between the two groups. The -test, Mann-Whitney test, χ test or Fisher's exact probability method was used to compare the perioperative data and follow-up results of the two groups after matching, respectively. Each group had 63 patients after PSM with well-balanced baseline characteristics. There was no statistic difference in the type of hepatectomy,combined common bile duct exploration rate,T tube drainage placement rate,operation time,intraoperative transfusion rate,intraoperative accidental injury rate,initial and final stone clearance rate,and stone recurrence rate between the two groups. However,compared with the open hepatectomy group, the laparoscopic group had significantly lower intraoperative blood loss ((IQR))(300(175)ml 350(145)ml, =3.227,=0.001),shorter postoperative hospital stay((10.6±4.1)days (14.0±4.0)days,=4.634,0.01),shorter time to postoperative oral intake ((1.8±1.1)days (2.9±1.6)days, =4.556, 0.01), and lower postoperative complication rate (25.4%(16/63) 49.2%(31/63), χ²=7.635, =0.006). Laparoscopic hepatectomy is safe and effective for hepatolithiasis with the advantages of less intraoperative blood loss,lower postoperative complications and faster postoperative recovery.

摘要

比较腹腔镜肝切除术和开腹肝切除术治疗肝内胆管结石的安全性和疗效。回顾性收集2014年1月至2020年5月在川北医学院附属医院肝胆外科一病区接受腹腔镜或开腹肝切除术的254例肝内胆管结石患者的临床病理资料。其中男性74例,女性180例,年龄(56±8)岁(范围:38至77岁)。254例患者中,162例行腹腔镜手术(腹腔镜组),92例行开腹手术(开腹组)。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)法对两组的基线特征进行匹配,然后比较两组的围手术期结果和随访疗效。分别采用t检验、Mann-Whitney检验、χ²检验或Fisher确切概率法比较匹配后两组的围手术期数据和随访结果。PSM后每组各有63例患者,基线特征均衡。两组在肝切除术类型、联合胆总管探查率、T管引流放置率、手术时间、术中输血率、术中意外损伤率、初始和最终结石清除率以及结石复发率方面无统计学差异。然而,与开腹肝切除术组相比,腹腔镜组术中出血量(四分位数间距)显著更低(300(175)ml比350(145)ml,Z = 3.227,P = 0.001),术后住院时间更短((10.6±4.1)天比(14.0±4.0)天,t = 4.634,P = 0.01),术后开始经口进食时间更短((1.8±1.1)天比(2.9±1.6)天,t = 4.556,P = 0.01),术后并发症发生率更低(25.4%(16/63)比49.2%(31/63),χ² = 7.635,P = 0.006)。腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝内胆管结石安全有效,具有术中出血少、术后并发症少、术后恢复快等优点。

相似文献

1
[Safety and efficacy evaluation of laparoscopic and open hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis: a propensity score matched analysis].[腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝内胆管结石的安全性和疗效评估:倾向评分匹配分析]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 1;60(6):593-598. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20211212-00594.
2
[Open hepatectomy versus laparoscopic in the treatment of primary left-sided hepatolithiasis: a propensity, long-term follow-up analysis at a single center].[开放肝切除术与腹腔镜手术治疗原发性左侧肝内胆管结石:单中心倾向评分长期随访分析]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Jul 1;58(7):530-538. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20191114-00561.
3
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for complex hepatolithiasis: a propensity score matching analysis.机器人辅助腹腔镜手术治疗复杂肝内胆管结石:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2539-2547. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6547-8. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
4
Laparoscopic hepatectomy produces better outcomes for hepatolithiasis than open hepatectomy: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝胆管结石症的效果优于开腹肝切除术:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 Mar;51:151-163. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.016. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
5
Laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis: a feasibility and safety study in 29 patients.腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝内胆管结石:29例患者的可行性与安全性研究
Surg Endosc. 2007 Jul;21(7):1074-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9306-9. Epub 2007 May 22.
6
Laparoscopic open hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝内胆管结石的系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Nov 21;23(43):7791-7806. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i43.7791.
7
Laparoscopic left-sided hepatectomy for the treatment of hepatolithiasis: A comparative study with open approach.腹腔镜左半肝切除术治疗肝胆管结石:与开放手术的对比研究。
Int J Surg. 2017 Apr;40:117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.02.068. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
8
[Efficacy comparison between laparoscopy and open surgery in the treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors larger than 2 cm using multicenter propensity score matching method].[多中心倾向评分匹配法比较腹腔镜与开放手术治疗直径大于2cm胃胃肠道间质瘤的疗效]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Sep 25;23(9):888-895. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20200616-00366.
9
Major hepatectomy for primary hepatolithiasis: a comparative study of laparoscopic versus open treatment.原发性肝胆管结石的肝叶切除术:腹腔镜与开放治疗的对比研究。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Oct;32(10):4271-4276. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6176-2. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
10
Clinical and economic comparison of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for primary hepatolithiasis: a propensity score-matched cohort study.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗原发性肝胆管结石的临床和经济比较:倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2024 Apr 1;110(4):1896-1903. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001027.

引用本文的文献

1
Classification of left-side hepatolithiasis for laparoscopic middle hepatic vein-guided anatomical hemihepatectomy combined with transhepatic duct lithotomy.腹腔镜下肝中静脉引导解剖性左半肝切除联合经肝胆管取石术治疗左肝胆管结石病的分类。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jul;37(7):5737-5751. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10198-4. Epub 2023 Jun 20.