The Ohio State University, USA.
The Ohio State University, USA.
Soc Sci Res. 2022 Jul;105:102698. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102698. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
Institutional integration has long been an important focus in literatures on inequality, education and mobility. Building on this work and drawing from multi-wave survey and records data from a large public university, the analyses we offer in this article provide unique and systematic comparative tests of first- versus continuing-generation inequalities in integration, disaggregated by academic versus social types, and with attention to other potentially influential status attributes. Our findings reveal: (1) clear overall inequalities in campus integration for first-generation students that cut across gender and race/ethnic lines; (2) a higher likelihood of employment among first-generation students-employment that tends to detract from integration opportunities; and (3) especially pronounced inequalities when it comes to forms of academic and social integration that entail bureaucratic- and resource-related barriers. We discuss the implications for understanding inequality and the first-generation experience in higher education and for more general sociological conceptions of institutional integration and mobility.
制度融合长期以来一直是不平等、教育和流动文献的一个重要关注点。本研究基于这一工作,并借鉴了一所大型公立大学的多波调查和记录数据,提供了对第一代和继续代在融合方面的不平等的独特和系统的比较测试,同时关注了其他潜在的有影响力的地位属性。我们的研究结果表明:(1)第一代学生在校园融合方面存在明显的总体不平等,跨越了性别和种族/族裔界限;(2)第一代学生更有可能就业,而这种就业往往会减少他们的融合机会;(3)在涉及官僚和资源相关障碍的学术和社会融合形式方面,不平等现象尤为明显。我们讨论了这些发现对理解高等教育中的不平等和第一代经验以及更普遍的制度融合和流动的社会学概念的意义。