Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jun 4;22(1):485. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03160-x.
Frailty is clinically associated with multiple adverse outcomes, including reduced quality of life and functioning, falls, hospitalisations, moves to long-term care and mortality. Health services commonly focus on the frailest, with highest levels of need. However, evidence suggests that frailty is likely to be more reversible in people who are less frail. Evidence is emerging on what interventions may help prevent or reduce frailty, such as resistance exercises and multi-component interventions, but few interventions are based on behaviour change theory. There is little evidence of cost-effectiveness. Previously, we co-designed a new behaviour change health promotion intervention ("HomeHealth") to support people with mild frailty. HomeHealth is delivered by trained voluntary sector support workers over six months who support older people to work on self-identified goals to maintain their independence, such as strength and balance exercises, nutrition, mood and enhancing social engagement. The service was well received in our feasibility randomised controlled trial and showed promising effects upon outcomes.
To test the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the HomeHealth intervention on maintaining independence in older people with mild frailty in comparison to treatment as usual (TAU).
Single-blind individually randomised controlled trial comparing the HomeHealth intervention to TAU. We will recruit 386 participants from general practices and the community across three English regions. Participants are included if they are community-dwelling, aged 65 + , with mild frailty according to the Clinical Frailty Scale. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to receive HomeHealth or TAU for 6 months. The primary outcome is independence in activities of daily living (modified Barthel Index) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include instrumental activities of daily living, quality of life, frailty, wellbeing, psychological distress, loneliness, cognition, capability, falls, carer burden, service use, costs and mortality. Outcomes will be analysed using linear mixed models, controlling for baseline Barthel score and site. A health economic analysis and embedded mixed-methods process evaluation will be conducted.
This trial will provide definitive evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a home-based, individualised intervention to maintain independence in older people with mild frailty in comparison to TAU, that could be implemented at scale if effective.
ISRCTN, ISRCTN54268283 . Registered 06/04/2020.
虚弱与多种不良结局相关,包括生活质量和功能下降、跌倒、住院、转移至长期护理机构以及死亡。卫生服务通常专注于最虚弱、需求最高的人群。然而,有证据表明,对于那些虚弱程度较低的人,虚弱可能更容易逆转。目前已经有证据表明,哪些干预措施可能有助于预防或减少虚弱,例如阻力训练和多组分干预,但很少有干预措施基于行为改变理论。其成本效益的证据也很少。此前,我们共同设计了一种新的行为改变健康促进干预措施(“家庭健康”),以支持轻度虚弱的老年人。家庭健康由经过培训的志愿部门支持人员提供,服务时间为六个月,他们支持老年人确定自己的目标,例如力量和平衡练习、营养、情绪和增强社会参与度,以保持独立性。该服务在我们的可行性随机对照试验中得到了很好的接受,并显示出对结果有积极影响。
测试家庭健康干预措施在维持轻度虚弱的老年人独立性方面的临床和成本效益,与常规治疗(TAU)相比。
比较家庭健康干预措施与 TAU 的单盲个体随机对照试验。我们将从英格兰的三个地区的全科医生和社区中招募 386 名参与者。符合临床虚弱量表的社区居住、年龄在 65 岁及以上、轻度虚弱的参与者符合纳入标准。参与者将按照 1:1 的比例随机分配接受家庭健康或 TAU 治疗 6 个月。主要结局是 12 个月时日常生活活动(改良巴氏量表)的独立性。次要结局包括工具性日常生活活动、生活质量、虚弱、幸福感、心理困扰、孤独感、认知、能力、跌倒、照顾者负担、服务利用、成本和死亡率。将使用线性混合模型对结果进行分析,控制基线巴氏量表评分和地点。将进行健康经济学分析和嵌入式混合方法过程评估。
该试验将提供关于家庭为基础、个体化干预措施在维持轻度虚弱的老年人独立性方面的有效性和成本效益的明确证据,与 TAU 相比,如果有效,该干预措施可以大规模实施。
ISRCTN,ISRCTN54268283。注册日期:2020 年 4 月 6 日。