Regulatory Compliance Limited, 6 Dryden Road, Loanhead, Midlothian EH20 9TY, UK; Centre for Inflammation Research, University of Edinburgh, Queen's Medical Research Institute, 47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK.
SAHCo Ltd, Chester CH3 7JW, UK.
Toxicology. 2022 May 30;474:153221. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2022.153221. Epub 2022 May 31.
Inhalation exposure to copper may occur during a range of occupational activities and the purpose of this study was to characterise the toxicological response to repeated inhalation of two copper compounds, representative of copper substances in large-scale production/use. Crl:CD(SD) rats were repeatedly exposed to aerosols of dicopper oxide (CuO) or copper sulphate pentahydrate (CuSO.5 HO) for 14-days as part of a range finding study at normalised copper doses of 0.18, 0.71, 1.78 and 8.9 mg/m Cu. Within a 28-days main study (CuO only), animals were repeatedly exposed to 0.2, 0.4, 0.8 and 2.0 mg/m CuO following OECD TG 412. The main study also consisted of satellite groups exposed for 1-, 2- or 3- weeks as well as a 13-week post-exposure recovery period group. Repeated exposure for 14-days to both copper compounds, normalised for copper content, led to an acute influx of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (neutrophils) and macrophages whilst only CuSO.5 HO exposure resulted in epithelial hyperplasia. This differential response may reflect the highly dissolvable nature of CuSO.5 HO in lung lining fluid leading to a release of copper ions at the epithelial surface whilst CuO is relatively indissolvable at neutral pH. In the 28-day study with CuO, an increase in cellularity was also evident in both histological and BALF samples and was dose-related with minimal to mild (neutrophilic) inflammation observed > 0.4 mg/m in the lung tissue sections and significant increases from 0.2 mg/m in BALF. There were no minimal haematological findings, no clinical findings and systemic organs were unaffected by inhalation exposure to dicopper oxide. The lung cellular response was limited to alveolar histiocytosis and neutrophil influx with no evidence of epithelial hyperplasia or fibrosis and all lung biomarkers returned to control levels within the post-exposure recovery period. Interestingly, the satellite groups showed that this acute cellular response followed a biphasic rather than monotonic pattern with a peak in lung biomarkers between weeks 1-3 and reduction thereafter. This reduction in lung biomarkers occurred during continued exposure and may indicate an adaptive response to copper exposure. Overall, these results show that repeated exposure to copper compounds results in an acute cellular response with no associated pathology and which fully resolved after the cessation of exposure. Therefore, the cellular response is evidence of a controlled and adaptive response associated with the removal of CuO from the alveolar surface.
在一系列职业活动中,可能会发生吸入铜的情况,本研究的目的是描述反复吸入两种铜化合物(大规模生产/使用的铜物质的代表)引起的毒理学反应。Crl:CD(SD)大鼠在正常铜剂量为 0.18、0.71、1.78 和 8.9mg/m3 的情况下,通过气溶胶吸入法接受二氧化铜(CuO)或五水合硫酸铜(CuSO.5 HO)14 天,作为探索性研究的一部分。在为期 28 天的主要研究(仅 CuO)中,动物在 OECD TG 412 之后,以 0.2、0.4、0.8 和 2.0mg/m3 的剂量重复暴露于 CuO。主要研究还包括暴露 1、2 或 3 周的卫星组,以及 13 周的暴露后恢复期组。14 天内反复暴露于两种铜化合物,经铜含量归一化后,导致多形核白细胞(中性粒细胞)和巨噬细胞的急性涌入,而仅暴露于 CuSO.5 HO 会导致上皮细胞增生。这种差异反应可能反映了 CuSO.5 HO 在肺衬里液中的高度可溶性质,导致上皮表面释放铜离子,而 CuO 在中性 pH 值下相对不可溶。在 28 天的 CuO 研究中,组织学和 BALF 样本中也明显出现细胞增多,与剂量相关,在肺组织切片中观察到 0.4mg/m3 以上有轻微至轻度(嗜中性粒细胞)炎症,BALF 中明显增加 0.2mg/m3。血液学检查无最小发现,无临床发现,系统器官不受吸入二氧化铜的影响。肺细胞反应仅限于肺泡组织细胞增多和中性粒细胞涌入,没有上皮细胞增生或纤维化的证据,所有肺生物标志物在暴露后恢复期内均恢复到对照水平。有趣的是,卫星组显示,这种急性细胞反应遵循双相而不是单调模式,在第 1-3 周之间达到高峰,之后减少。这种肺生物标志物的减少发生在持续暴露期间,可能表明对铜暴露的适应性反应。总的来说,这些结果表明,反复接触铜化合物会引起急性细胞反应,无相关病理,暴露停止后完全缓解。因此,细胞反应是与从肺泡表面清除 CuO 相关的受控和适应性反应的证据。