• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

D3 骨中平台转换型莫氏锥度牙种植体等嵴顶和嵴顶下放置时应力分布的生物力学评估:有限元分析

Biomechanical Evaluation of Stress Distribution in Equicrestal and Sub-crestally Placed, Platform-Switched Morse Taper Dental Implants in D3 Bone: Finite Element Analysis.

作者信息

Ellendula Yashaswini, Chandra Sekar Anam, Nalla Sandeep, Basany Ram B, Sailasri Kunchala, Thandu Ashwini

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, SVS Institute of Dental Sciences, Mahabubnagar, IND.

Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, SVS Institute Of Dental Sciences, Mahabubnagar, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Apr 29;14(4):e24591. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24591. eCollection 2022 Apr.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.24591
PMID:35664406
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9148546/
Abstract

Aim The aim of the study was to assess the effect of implant placement depth on stress distribution in bone around a platform-switched and Morse taper dental implants placed at the equi-crestal and 1 mm and 2 mm sub-crestal levels in a D3 bone using the 3D finite element analysis. Methodology A mechanical model of a partially edentulous maxilla was generated from a computerized tomography (CT) scan of an edentulous patient, as it can give exact bony contours of cortical bone. Also, from accurate geometric measurements obtained from the manufacturer, 3D models of Morse taper and platform-switched implants were manually drawn. The implant and bone models were then superimposed to simulate implant insertion in bone. Three implant positioning levels such as the equi-crestal, 1 mm sub-crestal, and 2 mm sub-crestal models were created, and meshing was done to create the number of elements for distribution of applying loads. The elastic properties of cortical bone and implant, such as Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio (µ), were determined. A load (axial and oblique) of 200N that simulated masticatory force was applied. Results On comparing stresses within the bone around the equi-crestal and 1 mm and 2 mm sub-crestal implants, it was observed that the maximum stresses were seen within cortical bone around the equi-crestally placed implant (21.694), the least in the 2 mm sub-crestally placed implant (18.85), and intermediate stresses were seen within the 1 mm sub-crestally placed implant (18.876). Conclusion Sub-crestal (1-2mm) placement of a Morse taper and a platform-switched implant is recommended for long-term success, as maximum von Mises stresses were found within cortical bone around the equi-crestal implant followed by the 1 mm sub-crestal implant and then the 2 mm sub-crestal implant.

摘要

目的 本研究的目的是使用三维有限元分析,评估种植体植入深度对在D3骨中位于龈缘平齐、龈下1mm和2mm水平的平台转换型和莫氏锥度牙科种植体周围骨组织应力分布的影响。

方法 从一名无牙患者的计算机断层扫描(CT)图像生成部分无牙上颌骨的力学模型,因为它可以给出皮质骨的确切骨轮廓。此外,根据制造商提供的精确几何测量数据,手动绘制莫氏锥度和平台转换型种植体的三维模型。然后将种植体模型与骨模型叠加,以模拟种植体植入骨内的情况。创建了三个种植体定位水平的模型,即龈缘平齐、龈下1mm和龈下2mm模型,并进行网格划分以确定施加负荷时的单元数量。测定了皮质骨和种植体的弹性特性,如杨氏模量和泊松比(μ)。施加一个模拟咀嚼力的200N负荷(轴向和斜向)。

结果 比较龈缘平齐、龈下1mm和龈下2mm种植体周围骨内的应力时,发现龈缘平齐种植体周围皮质骨内的最大应力为21.694,龈下2mm种植体周围的应力最小(18.85),龈下1mm种植体周围的应力居中(18.876)。

结论 建议采用龈下(1 - 2mm)植入莫氏锥度和平台转换型种植体以获得长期成功,因为在龈缘平齐种植体周围皮质骨内发现的最大冯·米塞斯应力最大,其次是龈下1mm种植体,然后是龈下2mm种植体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/9148546/8160eaddedb8/cureus-0014-00000024591-i11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/9148546/a05777f4398b/cureus-0014-00000024591-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/9148546/5912d2f98517/cureus-0014-00000024591-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/9148546/f29cb1562559/cureus-0014-00000024591-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/9148546/f5a441865e59/cureus-0014-00000024591-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/9148546/1acc52ea506f/cureus-0014-00000024591-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/9148546/8dd7803c3783/cureus-0014-00000024591-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/9148546/f8b2c5e95cd0/cureus-0014-00000024591-i07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/9148546/75f2487fb395/cureus-0014-00000024591-i08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/9148546/048cc192cc6b/cureus-0014-00000024591-i09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/9148546/9566d91d1286/cureus-0014-00000024591-i10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/9148546/8160eaddedb8/cureus-0014-00000024591-i11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/9148546/a05777f4398b/cureus-0014-00000024591-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/9148546/5912d2f98517/cureus-0014-00000024591-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/9148546/f29cb1562559/cureus-0014-00000024591-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/9148546/f5a441865e59/cureus-0014-00000024591-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/9148546/1acc52ea506f/cureus-0014-00000024591-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/9148546/8dd7803c3783/cureus-0014-00000024591-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/9148546/f8b2c5e95cd0/cureus-0014-00000024591-i07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/9148546/75f2487fb395/cureus-0014-00000024591-i08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/9148546/048cc192cc6b/cureus-0014-00000024591-i09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/9148546/9566d91d1286/cureus-0014-00000024591-i10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b3/9148546/8160eaddedb8/cureus-0014-00000024591-i11.jpg

相似文献

1
Biomechanical Evaluation of Stress Distribution in Equicrestal and Sub-crestally Placed, Platform-Switched Morse Taper Dental Implants in D3 Bone: Finite Element Analysis.D3 骨中平台转换型莫氏锥度牙种植体等嵴顶和嵴顶下放置时应力分布的生物力学评估:有限元分析
Cureus. 2022 Apr 29;14(4):e24591. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24591. eCollection 2022 Apr.
2
Finite element analysis of peri-implant bone volume affected by stresses around Morse taper implants: effects of implant positioning to the bone crest.莫氏锥度种植体周围应力对种植体周围骨体积的有限元分析:种植体相对于牙槽嵴顶位置的影响
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2018 Sep;21(12):655-662. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2018.1507025.
3
Crestal and Subcrestal Placement of Morse Cone Implant-Abutment Connection Implants: An In Vitro Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Study.莫氏锥度种植体-基台连接种植体的嵴顶和嵴下放置:一项体外有限元分析(FEA)研究。
Biomedicines. 2023 Nov 16;11(11):3077. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11113077.
4
Effect of the prosthetic index on stress distribution in Morse taper connection implant system and peri-implant bone: a 3D finite element analysis.种植体-基台连接系统及种植体周围骨的三维有限元分析:假体指数对种植体系统中应力分布的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Sep 30;22(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02465-y.
5
Evaluating the effect of subcrestal placement on platform switched short dental implants and von mises stress in D3 bone-A 3D FEM study.评估骨 D3 中平台转换短种植体基底骨开窗种植对 von mises 应力和种植体稳定性的影响-三维有限元研究。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2021 May;24(5):660-666. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_362_20.
6
Biomechanical influence of narrow-diameter implants placed at the crestal and subcrestal level in the maxillary anterior region. A 3D finite element analysis.上颌前部区域牙槽嵴顶和牙槽嵴下水平植入窄直径种植体的生物力学影响。三维有限元分析。
J Prosthodont. 2024 Feb;33(2):180-187. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13667. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
7
Finite element analysis of stress extent at peri-implant bone surrounding external hexagon or Morse taper implants.外六角或莫氏锥度种植体周围种植体周围骨应力范围的有限元分析。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017 Jul;71:441-447. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
8
Does Implant Placement Below the Ridge Reduce Crestal Bone Loss? A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.种植体置于牙槽嵴下方是否能减少牙槽嵴顶骨吸收?一项半口随机对照临床试验。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2025 Feb 7;40(1):41-50. doi: 10.11607/jomi.10947.
9
The Effects of Subcrestal Implant Placement on Crestal Bone Levels and Bone-to-Abutment Contact: A Microcomputed Tomographic and Histologic Study in Dogs.牙槽嵴顶下种植体植入对牙槽嵴顶骨水平及骨与基台接触的影响:犬的微计算机断层扫描和组织学研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Sep-Oct;30(5):1068-75. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4043.
10
Evaluation of Platform Switching on Crestal Bone Stress in Tapered and Cylindrical Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.平台转换对锥形和圆柱形种植体嵴骨应力影响的评估:有限元分析
J Int Acad Periodontol. 2015 Jan;17(1):2-13.

引用本文的文献

1
Finite Element Analysis of Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) and Bone Stresses for Implant Inclinations of 0°, 15°, and 20°.种植体倾斜角度为0°、15°和20°时种植体稳定性商数(ISQ)及骨应力的有限元分析
Materials (Basel). 2025 Apr 2;18(7):1625. doi: 10.3390/ma18071625.
2
Evaluation of Microstrain in the Regions Surrounding Morse Taper and External Hexagon Implants.莫氏锥度和外六角种植体周围区域的微应变评估。
Eur J Dent. 2025 Feb;19(1):180-186. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1787696. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
3
Influence of torque and bone type on stability quotient of two implant platforms: a clinical trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Biomechanical Evaluation of Stress Distribution in Subcrestal Placed Platform-switched Short Dental Implants in D4 Bone: Finiteelement Model Study.D4骨中平台转换短种植体龈下放置时应力分布的生物力学评估:有限元模型研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2020 Aug;12(Suppl 1):S134-S139. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_44_20. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
2
Finite element analysis of peri-implant bone volume affected by stresses around Morse taper implants: effects of implant positioning to the bone crest.莫氏锥度种植体周围应力对种植体周围骨体积的有限元分析:种植体相对于牙槽嵴顶位置的影响
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2018 Sep;21(12):655-662. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2018.1507025.
3
扭矩和骨类型对两种种植体平台稳定性系数的影响:一项临床试验。
Braz Oral Res. 2024 Jun 24;38:e049. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0049. eCollection 2024.
4
Finite element analysis (FEA) of stress distribution in platform-switched short dental implants.平台转换型短牙种植体应力分布的有限元分析
Bioinformation. 2024 Mar 31;20(3):248-251. doi: 10.6026/973206300200248. eCollection 2024.
5
Biomechanical Effects of Ti-Base Abutment Height on the Dental Implant System: A Finite Element Analysis.钛基台高度对牙种植体系统的生物力学影响:有限元分析
J Funct Biomater. 2024 Apr 11;15(4):101. doi: 10.3390/jfb15040101.
Systematic review of clinical and patient-reported outcomes following oral rehabilitation on dental implants with a tapered compared to a non-tapered implant design.
口腔种植修复中,与非渐细设计相比,渐细设计的种植体在临床和患者报告结局方面的系统评价。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 16:41-54. doi: 10.1111/clr.13128.
4
[Current dental implant design and its clinical importance].[当前牙科种植体设计及其临床重要性]
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Feb 1;35(1):18-28. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2017.01.003.
5
Morse taper dental implants and platform switching: The new paradigm in oral implantology.莫氏锥度牙种植体与平台转换:口腔种植学的新范式。
Eur J Dent. 2016 Jan-Mar;10(1):148-154. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.175677.
6
Does Implant Design Affect Implant Primary Stability? A Resonance Frequency Analysis-Based Randomized Split-Mouth Clinical Trial.种植体设计会影响种植体初期稳定性吗?一项基于共振频率分析的随机分口临床试验。
J Oral Implantol. 2015 Dec;41(6):e281-6. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-13-00294. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
7
Comparative evaluation of stresses in tooth implant connected fixed partial denture by varying the implant design and position: a 3D finite element study.通过改变种植体设计和位置对牙种植体连接的固定局部义齿应力的比较评估:一项三维有限元研究。
Indian J Dent Res. 2013 Jul-Aug;24(4):439-45. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.118388.
8
The effect of placement depth of platform-switched implants on periimplant cortical bone stress: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.种植体平台转换后位置对种植体周围皮质骨应力的影响:三维有限元分析。
Implant Dent. 2013 Apr;22(2):165-9. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31827f34d0.
9
Influences of implant neck design and implant-abutment joint type on peri-implant bone stress and abutment micromovement: three-dimensional finite element analysis.种植体颈部设计和种植体-基台连接类型对种植体周围骨应力和基台微动的影响:三维有限元分析。
Dent Mater. 2012 Nov;28(11):1126-33. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.07.160. Epub 2012 Aug 21.
10
Biomechanical evaluation of subcrestal placement of dental implants: in vitro and numerical analyses.种植体骨下区植入的生物力学评估:体外与数值分析。
J Periodontol. 2011 Feb;82(2):302-10. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100040. Epub 2010 Sep 1.