Balaguer Mathieu, Pommée Timothy, Pinquier Julien, Farinas Jérôme, Woisard Virginie, Sordes Florence
IRIT, CNRS, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
ENT Department, CHU Larrey, Toulouse, France.
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2023;75(1):52-66. doi: 10.1159/000525352. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
The constitution of social circles around patients treated for cancer of the upper aerodigestive tract (UADT) has a major influence on factors that affect quality of life (QOL) but is poorly assessed, mainly due to a lack of tools. The objective of this study is to develop a questionnaire that assesses the constitution of social circles in a population treated for UADT cancer and to analyze the construct (structural and clinical validity) and criterion validity.
The Evaluation of the Constitution of Social Circles (ECSC) questionnaire was developed in French by a committee of experts. Structural validity was analyzed using inter-item correlations. The scores of a group of patients treated for UADT cancer were compared with those of a group of healthy subjects (clinical validity). For criterion validity, the ECSC scores were compared to those from various questionnaires that assess social functioning (QFS), psychological status (HAD), perceived speech impairment (PHI), and QOL (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) in patients.
Structural validity shows low to moderate inter-item correlations which is consistent with the construction of the questionnaire not assessing underlying concepts. Clinical validity was satisfactory regarding the frequency of contact (p = 0.01), satisfaction with the frequency of contact in the private circle (p = 0.03), and the size of the social circles of family and friends (p ≤ 0.01). Criterion validity was adequate with moderate correlations between the ECSC scores and the QFS sub-scores of interest (rs > 0.56, p < 0.05). Anxiety (HAD) had a low correlation (|rs| = 0.46, p < 0.05) with satisfaction with exchanges and the frequency of contact with family. Satisfaction with exchanges with the private circle was moderately correlated with the EORTC QLQ-H&N35 score (rs = 0.56, p = 0.01) and showed a negative trend on the PHI (rs < -0.39, p ≥ 0.05).
While the test-retest reliability is yet to be evaluated and the sample size should be increased, this preliminary study shows that the ECSC is a valid tool for assessing the constitution of social circles in patients treated for UADT cancer. It highlights the links between social circles and their functional impact on communication and QOL.
上消化道(UADT)癌症患者周围社交圈的构成对影响生活质量(QOL)的因素有重大影响,但由于缺乏相关工具,对此评估不足。本研究的目的是开发一份问卷,用于评估接受UADT癌症治疗人群的社交圈构成,并分析其结构效度(结构和临床效度)及效标效度。
社交圈构成评估(ECSC)问卷由一个专家委员会用法语编制。使用项目间相关性分析结构效度。将一组接受UADT癌症治疗的患者得分与一组健康受试者的得分进行比较(临床效度)。为评估效标效度,将ECSC得分与评估患者社交功能(QFS)、心理状态(HAD)、感知言语障碍(PHI)和生活质量(EORTC QLQ-H&N35)的各种问卷得分进行比较。
结构效度显示项目间相关性低至中等,这与问卷结构未评估潜在概念一致。在接触频率(p = 0.01)、对私人圈子接触频率的满意度(p = 0.03)以及家人和朋友社交圈规模(p≤0.01)方面,临床效度令人满意。效标效度足够,ECSC得分与感兴趣的QFS子得分之间存在中等相关性(rs>0.56,p<0.05)。焦虑(HAD)与交流满意度及与家人接触频率的相关性较低(|rs| = 0.46,p<0.05)。与私人圈子交流的满意度与EORTC QLQ-H&N35得分中度相关(rs = 0.56,p = 0.01),并且在PHI上呈负趋势(rs<-0.39,p≥0.05)。
虽然重测信度有待评估且样本量应增加,但这项初步研究表明,ECSC是评估接受UADT癌症治疗患者社交圈构成的有效工具。它突出了社交圈及其对沟通和生活质量的功能影响之间的联系。