Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022 Sep;29(9):974-982. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1194. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
Standardized criteria for drain removal in hepatobiliary resection are lacking. Here, we evaluated the outcomes of delayed removal policy in this extended surgery.
Patients undergoing hepatectomy with biliary reconstruction between 2012 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The drains were removed on postoperative day (POD) 7 when the drainage fluid was grossly serous, biochemically normal, and negative for bacterial contamination as assessed by Gram staining; additionally, no abnormal fluid collection was confirmed by computed tomography. Clinically relevant abdominal complications (CRACs), including biliary leakage, pancreatic fistula or intra-abdominal abscess, served as the primary outcome measure.
Among 374 study patients, surgical drains were removed in 166 (44.3%) patients who met the criteria. Of these patients, 16 (9.6%) patients subsequently required additional drainage due to CRAC. Drains were retained and exchanged in 208 (55.6%) patients who did not meet the criteria. Of these, exchanged drains were soon removed in 34 patients due to no signs of CRAC. The diagnostic ability of the criteria revealed 0.916 sensitivity, 0.815 specificity, and 0.866 accuracy.
The four findings on POD 7 worked well as criteria for drain removal, and these criteria may be helpful in drain management after hepatobiliary resection.
肝胆切除术后引流管去除的标准化标准尚缺乏。在此,我们评估了这种扩大手术中延迟去除策略的结果。
回顾性分析了 2012 年至 2018 年间行肝切除术和胆道重建术的患者。当引流液外观呈浆液性、生化正常且革兰染色阴性提示无细菌污染时,引流管于术后第 7 天(POD7)拔除;另外,计算机断层扫描(CT)也未发现异常积液。临床相关腹部并发症(CRAC),包括胆漏、胰瘘或腹腔脓肿,作为主要的观察指标。
在 374 例研究患者中,166 例(44.3%)符合标准的患者拔除了引流管。其中,16 例(9.6%)患者因 CRAC 而需要再次引流。208 例(55.6%)不符合标准的患者保留并更换了引流管。其中,34 例患者因无 CRAC 迹象而很快更换了引流管。这些标准在 POD7 的四项发现具有良好的诊断能力,其敏感度为 0.916,特异度为 0.815,准确度为 0.866。
POD7 的四项发现可以作为引流管去除的标准,这些标准可能有助于肝胆切除术后的引流管理。