• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外科医生对乳腺导管原位癌患者使用前哨淋巴结活检的偏好。

Surgeons' preferences for using sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.

机构信息

CMAnalyzing, Zevenaar, the Netherlands.

Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jun 6;17(6):e0269551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269551. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0269551
PMID:35666740
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9170095/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a large variation between Dutch hospitals in the use of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) in patients with a biopsy diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ. The aim of our study was to investigate whether this variation might be explained by preferences of surgeons, organisational factors or the influence of patients preferences.

METHODS

A cross-sectional web survey was conducted among 260 Dutch oncological/breast surgeons. Preferences of surgeons and the influence of the patients' preferences were determined by means of best-worst scaling (BWS) of profile case scenarios and by ranking risk factors. The survey also explored organisational questions, the reported use of diagnostic techniques and influences on the decision.

RESULTS

The BWS scenarios were completed by 57 surgeons. The most important reasons for performing SLNB were a suspected invasive component and DCIS grade 3. In the ranking, these were also the first and second most important factor, followed by the size of the lesion and a mass on mammogram. In 58% to 70% of the scenarios, the surgeons would not change their decisions on the use of SLNB if the patient's chose differed. No organisational factor was significantly associated with the reported use of SLNB.

CONCLUSION

The inter-hospital variation in the use of SLNB could not be attributed to organisational factors or surgeons' preferences for risk factors. The risk factors that most surgeons reported as reasons for performing SLNB are consistent with the factors described in the Dutch treatment guideline for the use of SLNB.

摘要

背景

荷兰各家医院在诊断为乳腺导管原位癌(DCIS)的患者中使用前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)的做法存在较大差异。本研究旨在调查这种差异是否可以用外科医生的偏好、组织因素或患者偏好的影响来解释。

方法

对 260 名荷兰肿瘤/乳腺外科医生进行了横断面网络调查。通过对病例特征进行最佳最差分级(BWS)和对风险因素进行排序,确定了外科医生的偏好及其对患者偏好的影响。该调查还探讨了组织问题、诊断技术的应用情况以及对决策的影响。

结果

57 名外科医生完成了 BWS 病例。进行 SLNB 的最主要原因是怀疑存在浸润性成分和 DCIS 分级 3。在排名中,这也是最重要的第一和第二因素,其次是病变大小和乳房 X 线照相术上的肿块。在 58%至 70%的情况下,如果患者的选择不同,外科医生不会改变对 SLNB 使用的决定。没有组织因素与 SLNB 的报告使用显著相关。

结论

SLNB 使用的医院间差异不能归因于组织因素或外科医生对风险因素的偏好。大多数外科医生报告的进行 SLNB 的原因是一致的,与荷兰 SLNB 使用治疗指南中描述的因素一致。

相似文献

1
Surgeons' preferences for using sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.外科医生对乳腺导管原位癌患者使用前哨淋巴结活检的偏好。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 6;17(6):e0269551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269551. eCollection 2022.
2
The use of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the treatment of breast ductal carcinoma in situ: A Danish population-based study.前哨淋巴结活检在乳腺导管原位癌治疗中的应用:一项基于丹麦人群的研究。
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Dec;87:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.09.037. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
3
Is Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Necessary for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Patients Undergoing Mastectomy?对于接受乳房切除术的导管原位癌患者,前哨淋巴结活检有必要吗?
Am Surg. 2020 Aug;86(8):955-957. doi: 10.1177/0003134820942164. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
4
Necessity of sentinel lymph node biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ patients: a retrospective analysis.前哨淋巴结活检在导管原位癌患者中的必要性:一项回顾性分析。
BMC Surg. 2021 Mar 22;21(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01170-x.
5
Core biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: an indication for sentinel lymph node biopsy.导管原位癌的粗针活检诊断:前哨淋巴结活检的一项指征
Curr Surg. 2005 Mar-Apr;62(2):253-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cursur.2004.09.011.
6
Prediction of underestimated invasiveness in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast on percutaneous biopsy as rationale for recommending concurrent sentinel lymph node biopsy.经皮穿刺活检诊断为乳腺导管原位癌患者低估侵袭性的预测因素及其推荐同期前哨淋巴结活检的理由。
Breast. 2013 Aug;22(4):537-42. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.11.002. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
7
Does sentinel lymph node biopsy for screening high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast cause more harm than good?用于筛查乳腺高级别导管原位癌的前哨淋巴结活检弊大于利吗?
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jul;182(1):47-54. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05690-7. Epub 2020 May 19.
8
Predictive factors of axillary positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in extended ductal carcinoma in situ treated by simple mastectomy at once.行单纯乳房切除术治疗的广泛导管原位癌中腋窝前哨淋巴结活检阳性的预测因素。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020 Mar;49(3):101641. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.101641. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
9
Partial axillary lymph node dissection inferior to the intercostobrachial nerves complements sentinel node biopsy in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer.在临床腋窝淋巴结阴性的乳腺癌患者中,在肋间臂神经下方进行部分腋窝淋巴结清扫可补充前哨淋巴结活检。
BMC Surg. 2015 Jun 30;15:79. doi: 10.1186/s12893-015-0067-4.
10
The Influence of Hospital and Surgeon Factors on the Prevalence of Axillary Lymph Node Evaluation in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.医院和外科医生因素对导管原位癌腋窝淋巴结评估流行率的影响。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Jun;1(3):323-32. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0389.

本文引用的文献

1
A prediction model for underestimation of invasive breast cancer after a biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: based on 2892 biopsies and 589 invasive cancers.基于 2892 例导管原位癌活检和 589 例浸润性癌的浸润性乳腺癌低估预测模型:
Br J Cancer. 2018 Oct;119(9):1155-1162. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0276-6. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
2
Variation in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ in the UK: Results of the Mammary Fold National Practice Survey.英国导管原位癌管理的差异:乳腺褶皱全国实践调查结果
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Aug;42(8):1153-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.05.024. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
3
A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey of UK Breast Surgeons' Views on the Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.
一项关于英国乳腺外科医生对导管原位癌治疗观点的全国性横断面调查。
Int J Breast Cancer. 2015;2015:104231. doi: 10.1155/2015/104231. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
4
Variations in the management of the axilla in screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ: evidence from the UK NHS breast screening programme audit of screen detected DCIS.英国国民保健署筛查性导管原位癌审计中对筛查性 DCIS 腋窝管理的变化:来自英国国民保健署乳腺筛查计划审计的证据。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jan;41(1):86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
5
Time trends and inter-hospital variation in treatment and axillary staging of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the era of screening in Southern Netherlands.荷兰南部筛查时代乳腺导管原位癌患者的治疗和腋窝分期的时间趋势和医院间差异。
Breast. 2014 Feb;23(1):63-8. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
6
Predictors of invasive breast cancer and lymph node involvement in ductal carcinoma in situ initially diagnosed by vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: experience of 733 cases.真空辅助乳腺活检诊断的导管原位癌中浸润性乳腺癌和淋巴结受累的预测因素:733 例经验。
Breast. 2012 Oct;21(5):635-40. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.06.009. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
7
Ductal carcinoma in situ at core-needle biopsy: meta-analysis of underestimation and predictors of invasive breast cancer.乳腺导管原位癌的核心针活检:低估的荟萃分析和浸润性乳腺癌的预测因素。
Radiology. 2011 Jul;260(1):119-28. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11102368. Epub 2011 Apr 14.