Darin F. Ullman (
Gregory J. Boyer, Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, Baltimore, Maryland.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Jun;41(6):893-900. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01856.
The Comprehensive End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Care (CEC) Model was the first Medicare specialty-oriented accountable care organization (ACO) model. We examined whether this model provided better results for beneficiaries with ESRD than primary care-based ACO models. We found significant decreases in Medicare payments ($126 per beneficiary per month), hospitalizations (5 percent), and likelihood of readmissions (8 percent) among beneficiaries with ESRD during the first year of alignment with the CEC Model and no impacts on these measures among beneficiaries with ESRD who were aligned with primary care-based ACOs, relative to fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries. Neither the CEC nor primary care-based ACO models significantly reduced the likelihood of catheter use, but fistula use increased for CEC Model beneficiaries to levels just above statistical significance. Other populations with chronic conditions may benefit from the testing of a specialty-oriented ACO model. In addition, primary care-based ACOs may benefit from applying CEC Model strategies to high-need subpopulations. Last, the strategies that enabled ESRD Seamless Care Organizations to achieve reductions in hospitalizations and readmissions even without hospital participation as owners could inform physician-led ACOs' efforts to coordinate with hospitals in their areas.
全面终末期肾病(ESRD)护理(CEC)模式是第一个专注于医疗保险专科的管理式医疗组织(ACO)模式。我们研究了该模式是否为 ESRD 患者提供了比基于初级保健的 ACO 模式更好的结果。我们发现,在与 CEC 模式保持一致的第一年,ESRD 患者的医疗保险支出(每位患者每月 126 美元)、住院率(5%)和再入院率(8%)显著下降,而与基于初级保健的 ACO 保持一致的 ESRD 患者在这些措施方面没有影响,与按服务收费的医疗保险患者相比。CEC 或基于初级保健的 ACO 模型都没有显著降低导管使用的可能性,但 CEC 模型的使用者瘘管使用增加,接近统计学意义。其他患有慢性疾病的人群可能会受益于专科 ACO 模式的测试。此外,基于初级保健的 ACO 可能会受益于将 CEC 模型策略应用于高需求亚人群。最后,即使没有医院作为所有者参与,使 ESRD 无缝护理组织能够实现住院和再入院减少的策略也可以为医生主导的 ACO 与所在地区医院协调的努力提供信息。