From the Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario de Navarra.
J Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Oct 1;28(7):346-348. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000001862. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
With the arrival of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in 2020, it was proposed to make the change from intravenous (IV) tocilizumab (TCZ) to its subcutaneous formulation, in order to avoid rheumatological patients having to go to the day hospital and guarantee enough IV TCZ for those critical patients with COVID who needed it. The aim of this study was to describe the rate and reasons for switching back to IV TCZ from subcutaneous TCZ.
We included patients from the rheumatology service that were on treatment with IV TCZ in February 2020 and were followed up until March 2021. Patients that remained on subcutaneous TCZ were compared with those who switched back to IV TCZ (switch-back group). A subgroup analysis according to rheumatic disease was performed.
Fifty-five patients switched to subcutaneous TCZ: 28 rheumatoid arthritis, 19 giant cell arteritis, 4 polymyalgia rheumatica, 2 juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and 2 systemic sclerosis. Seventeen patients switched back to IV TCZ due to ineffectiveness (n = 8), patient preference (n = 4), adverse events (n = 4), and difficulty with the SC administration route (n = 1). In the analysis by disease, 4 of 23 patients switched back to IV TCZ in giant cell arteritis/polymyalgia rheumatica group due to ineffectiveness (n = 2), injection site reaction (n = 1), or patient preference (n = 1). In rheumatoid arthritis group, 11 of 28 patients switched back to IV TCZ: ineffectiveness (n = 5), patient preference (n = 3), headache (n = 1), injection site reaction (n = 1), and due to difficulty with the SC administration route (n = 1).
Mass switch from IV to subcutaneous TCZ during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has been safe, effective, and well tolerated after 1 year of follow-up.
随着 2020 年 SARS-CoV-2 大流行的到来,有人提议将静脉注射(IV)托珠单抗(TCZ)改为皮下制剂,以避免风湿病患者不得不去日间医院,并确保有足够的 IV TCZ 用于那些需要的 COVID 重症患者。本研究的目的是描述从皮下 TCZ 转回 IV TCZ 的比率和原因。
我们纳入了 2020 年 2 月接受 IV TCZ 治疗并随访至 2021 年 3 月的风湿病服务患者。将继续接受皮下 TCZ 治疗的患者与转回 IV TCZ 的患者(转回组)进行比较。根据风湿病进行了亚组分析。
55 例患者转为皮下 TCZ:28 例类风湿关节炎,19 例巨细胞动脉炎,4 例多发性肌炎,2 例幼年特发性关节炎,2 例系统性硬化症。17 例患者因无效(n = 8)、患者偏好(n = 4)、不良反应(n = 4)和 SC 给药途径困难(n = 1)转回 IV TCZ。在疾病分析中,巨细胞动脉炎/多发性肌炎组有 4 例患者(n = 2)因无效、注射部位反应(n = 1)或患者偏好(n = 1)转回 IV TCZ。在类风湿关节炎组,28 例患者中有 11 例(n = 5)因无效、患者偏好(n = 3)、头痛(n = 1)、注射部位反应(n = 1)和 SC 给药途径困难(n = 1)转回 IV TCZ。
在 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间,从 IV 转为皮下 TCZ 的大规模转换在 1 年的随访后是安全、有效且耐受良好的。