Center For Sexuality and Health Disparities, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, MI, USA.
J Urban Health. 2022 Aug;99(4):692-700. doi: 10.1007/s11524-022-00661-3. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
This study compares and contrasts residents' perceptions of segregation measures using qualitative and quantitative data. Most studies exploring racial residential segregation and health outcomes use large-scale, metropolitan-wide measures. As a result, we have limited understanding of racial residential segregation outside of Census data, particularly about the firsthand experiences of those living in segregated areas. The purpose of this study was to compare data from Census-based measures of racial residential segregation with qualitative descriptions of these same constructs by pregnant, Black women in two US cities. Using novel qualitative interview questions, we explored the dimensions of segregation and neighborhood racial distribution among a sample of 27 pregnant, Black women between April and November 2019. The participants included in this sample had perceptions about their neighborhood segregation and demographic composition that were often different from the data derived from existing residential US Census data. The differences between qualitative and quantitative measures and the possible reasons for the discordance suggest new approaches to measurement and new directions for the study of segregation and health.
本研究使用定性和定量数据比较和对比居民对隔离措施的看法。大多数探索种族居住隔离和健康结果的研究使用大规模的、大都市范围的措施。因此,我们对人口普查数据之外的种族居住隔离的了解有限,特别是对居住在隔离地区的人的第一手经验的了解有限。本研究的目的是将基于人口普查的种族居住隔离措施的数据与来自美国两个城市的 27 名怀孕黑人女性对这些相同结构的定性描述进行比较。我们使用新颖的定性访谈问题,在 2019 年 4 月至 11 月期间,对 27 名怀孕的黑人女性进行了一项样本调查,以探讨隔离和邻里种族分布的维度。本研究样本中的参与者对他们所在社区的隔离状况和人口构成的看法,往往与现有美国人口普查数据得出的结论不同。定性和定量测量之间的差异以及不和谐的可能原因表明了测量方法的新途径和对隔离与健康研究的新方向。