Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
J Anim Ecol. 2022 Jun;91(6):1052-1055. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13704.
Research Highlight: Trzcinski, M., Cockle, K., Norris, A., Edworthy, A., Wiebe, K., & Martin, K. (2022). Woodpeckers maintain the diversity of cavity-nesting vertebrates in a temperate forest. Journal of Animal Ecology, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13626. Whether populations of hole-nesting birds are limited by the availability of cavities is a long-standing, fundamental question in avian community ecology. The structure of cavity-nesting communities, known as nest webs, includes links between tree species that provide natural holes and bird species that nest in those holes (secondary cavity nesters, SCNs), tree species that provide substrates for cavity excavation and bird species such as woodpeckers that create cavities using those substrates (primary cavity nesters, PCNs), and between PCNs and SCNs. Trzcinski et al. (2022) focus on the latter links and provide the most compelling empirical evidence to date that cavities created by PCNs specifically, as opposed to natural holes or holes generally, limit populations of SCNs. Using data from a long-term study, the authors employ three analyses to separate effects of availability of cavities from environmental factors such as food, habitat features and host tree abundance, while controlling for annual variation and autocorrelation within sites, to isolate the relationship between excavated cavities and SCN numbers. They show that nest density of SCNs is positively related to PCN nest density the previous year, an indicator of availability of excavated cavities, and that the effect of PCNs is stronger when other variables are accounted for. North American coniferous forests such as that studied by Trzcinski et al. (2022) are exceptional in that excavated cavities comprise the vast majority of nesting holes. Whether their findings apply to other systems in which PCNs are a major source of cavities, or to particular PCN-SCN relationships in systems in which excavated cavities account for a much lower proportion of nesting holes remains to be investigated.
Trzcinski、M.、Cockle、K.、Norris、A.、Edworthy、A.、Wiebe、K. 和 Martin、K.(2022 年)。在温带森林中,啄木鸟维持着洞穴筑巢脊椎动物的多样性。动物生态学杂志,https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13626. 洞穴筑巢鸟类的数量是否受到洞穴供应的限制,这是鸟类群落生态学中一个由来已久的基本问题。被称为巢网的洞穴筑巢群落的结构包括为鸟类提供天然洞穴的树种与在这些洞穴中筑巢的鸟类(次级洞穴筑巢者,SCNs)之间的联系、为洞穴挖掘提供基质的树种与利用这些基质的鸟类(初级洞穴筑巢者,PCNs)之间的联系,以及 PCNs 和 SCNs 之间的联系。Trzcinski 等人(2022 年)专注于后一种联系,并提供了迄今为止最有说服力的经验证据,证明了 PCNs 专门创建的洞穴,而不是天然洞穴或一般洞穴,限制了 SCNs 的数量。利用一项长期研究的数据,作者采用三种分析方法将洞穴供应的影响与食物等环境因素以及栖息地特征和宿主树丰度分开,同时控制了站点内的年度变化和自相关,以隔离挖掘洞穴与 SCN 数量之间的关系。他们表明,SCN 的巢密度与前一年 PCN 巢密度呈正相关,这是可挖掘洞穴供应的指标,并且当考虑到其他变量时,PCNs 的影响更强。北美针叶林等 Trzcinski 等人研究的森林(2022 年)异常之处在于,挖掘的洞穴构成了绝大多数筑巢的洞穴。他们的发现是否适用于 PCNs 是洞穴主要来源的其他系统,或者适用于挖掘洞穴占筑巢洞穴比例较低的系统中的特定 PCN-SCN 关系,仍有待研究。