• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜垂直袖状胃切除术(LVSG)和腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(LRYGB)术后 5 年以上的迟发性并发症:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Late (≥5 y) Complications of Laparoscopic Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy (LVSG) and Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

机构信息

Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston.

School of Human Movements and Nutrition Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2022 Aug 1;32(4):501-513. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001065.

DOI:10.1097/SLE.0000000000001065
PMID:35670641
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of data that compares the relative complication profiles of laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy (LVSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) at 5 years.

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to compare late complications of LVSG and LRYGB.

METHODS

We updated our previous systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of primary LVSG and LRYGB procedures in adults, to review late (5 years) complication outcomes (PROSPERO 112054). Electronic databases were searched from January 2015 to July 2021 for publications meeting inclusion criteria. The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman random effects model was utilized to estimate weighted mean differences where meta-analysis was possible. Bias and certainty of evidence was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations.

RESULTS

Four randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria (n=531; LVSG=272, LRYGB=259). No late treatment-related mortality was reported with either procedure. A significant reduction in surgical reoperations (odds ratio: 0.47, 95% confidence interval: 0.27-0.82, P =0.01) and endoscopic interventions (odds ratio: 0.29, 95% confidence interval: 0.12-0.71, P =0.02) were reported at 5 years post-LVSG relative to LRYGB. Reoperations were more frequently performed for reflux management in LVSG and for internal hernia repairs in LRYGB. Complications requiring medical management were common following both procedures. Limitations included few eligible studies for inclusion, and varying definitions of medically managed complications.

CONCLUSIONS

LRYGB is associated with a higher proportion of surgical and endoscopic interventions at 5 years compared with LVSG. More high-quality, long-term studies are required to further elucidate both surgical and nutritional long-term outcomes post these procedures.

摘要

背景

比较腹腔镜垂直袖状胃切除术(LVSG)和腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(LRYGB)在 5 年后的相对并发症发生率的数据很少。

目的

旨在比较 LVSG 和 LRYGB 的晚期并发症。

方法

我们更新了之前对成人原发性 LVSG 和 LRYGB 手术的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析,以回顾晚期(5 年)并发症结局(PROSPERO 112054)。从 2015 年 1 月至 2021 年 7 月,电子数据库检索符合纳入标准的出版物。如果可以进行荟萃分析,则使用 Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman 随机效应模型估计加权均数差。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具和 Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations 评估偏倚和证据确定性。

结果

四项随机对照试验符合纳入标准(n=531;LVSG=272,LRYGB=259)。两种手术均未报告晚期与治疗相关的死亡率。与 LRYGB 相比,LVSG 在 5 年后的手术再手术(比值比:0.47,95%置信区间:0.27-0.82,P=0.01)和内镜干预(比值比:0.29,95%置信区间:0.12-0.71,P=0.02)显著减少。LVSG 中再手术更频繁地用于反流管理,而 LRYGB 中用于内疝修复。两种手术都需要进行药物治疗的并发症很常见。局限性包括纳入的合格研究较少,以及对药物治疗并发症的定义不同。

结论

与 LVSG 相比,LRYGB 在 5 年后与手术和内镜干预的比例更高。需要更多高质量、长期的研究来进一步阐明这些手术后的手术和营养长期结果。

相似文献

1
Late (≥5 y) Complications of Laparoscopic Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy (LVSG) and Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.腹腔镜垂直袖状胃切除术(LVSG)和腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(LRYGB)术后 5 年以上的迟发性并发症:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2022 Aug 1;32(4):501-513. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001065.
2
Gastroesophageal reflux disease following laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass: meta-analysis and systematic review of 5-year data.腹腔镜垂直袖状胃切除术和腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术后胃食管反流病:5 年数据的荟萃分析和系统评价。
Dis Esophagus. 2024 Feb 29;37(3). doi: 10.1093/dote/doad063.
3
Five-Year Weight Loss Outcomes in Laparoscopic Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy (LVSG) Versus Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.腹腔镜垂直袖状胃切除术(LVSG)与腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(LRYGB)治疗肥胖症的 5 年减重效果:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020 Dec;30(6):542-553. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000834.
4
Late Postoperative Complications in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LVSG) Versus Laparoscopic Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB): Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LVSG)与腹腔镜Roux-en-y胃旁路术(LRYGB)术后晚期并发症的Meta分析和系统评价
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016 Jun;26(3):193-201. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000279.
5
Five-year Comorbidity Outcomes in Laparoscopic Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy (LVSG) and Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.腹腔镜垂直袖状胃切除术(LVSG)和腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(LRYGB)的 5 年合并症结局:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2023 Jun 1;33(3):241-248. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001156.
6
The effect of laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass on gastroesophageal reflux disease: An updated meta-analysis and systematic review of 5-year post-operative data from randomized controlled trials.腹腔镜垂直袖状胃切除术和腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术对胃食管反流病的影响:一项来自随机对照试验的 5 年术后数据的更新荟萃分析和系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6254-6269. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11303-x. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
7
Postoperative Early Major and Minor Complications in Laparoscopic Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy (LVSG) Versus Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) Procedures: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.腹腔镜垂直袖状胃切除术(LVSG)与腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(LRYGB)术后早期的主要和次要并发症:一项Meta分析和系统评价
Obes Surg. 2016 Oct;26(10):2273-84. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2101-8.
8
Diabetes improvement and resolution following laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy (LVSG) versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) procedures: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.腹腔镜垂直袖状胃切除术(LVSG)与腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(LRYGB)术后糖尿病的改善与缓解:一项随机对照试验的系统评价
Surg Endosc. 2017 Apr;31(4):1952-1963. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5202-5. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
9
Changes in Non-Diabetic Comorbid Disease Status Following Laparoscopic Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy (LVSG) Versus Laparoscopic Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) Procedures: a Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.腹腔镜垂直袖状胃切除术(LVSG)与腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(LRYGB)后非糖尿病合并疾病状态的变化:随机对照试验的系统评价
Obes Surg. 2017 May;27(5):1208-1221. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2469-5.
10
Weight Loss Outcomes in Laparoscopic Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy (LVSG) Versus Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) Procedures: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.腹腔镜垂直袖状胃切除术(LVSG)与腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(LRYGB)手术的减重效果:一项对随机对照试验的荟萃分析和系统评价
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Feb;27(1):8-18. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000374.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment Pathways and Outcomes in Patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m: Conservative Treatment, Immediate Surgery or Stepwise Surgical Approach.体重指数(BMI)≥50kg/m²患者的治疗途径与结局:保守治疗、即刻手术或逐步手术方式
Obes Surg. 2025 Jul 18. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-08102-1.
2
​​Long-Term Outcomes in Sleeve Gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.袖状胃切除术与Roux-en-Y胃旁路术的长期疗效:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Obes Surg. 2025 Jul 7. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-08044-8.