School of Education, Counseling, and Human Development, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, USA.
NDSU Extension Center for 4-H Youth Development, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.
Subst Abus. 2022;43(1):1245-1250. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2022.2074599.
In 2017, 45% of rural adults reported being directly impacted by the opioid epidemic. While research on the experiences of those using prescription opioids in rural communities is increasing, less is known about a unique sub-population who may have high rates of exposure: rural agricultural workers. The purpose of this study was to explore the prevalence and perceptions related to prescription opioids among rural producers and farmworkers. A questionnaire was mailed in spring 2019 and spring 2020 to rural residents living in one of two agricultural-based states in the Upper Midwest. Individuals were eligible to participate if any member of their family was involved in the agricultural industry. A total of 1116 questionnaires were returned for a 27.9% response rate. Participants were 68.1 years old on average. The majority identified as white, male, and married. Prescription opioid use was found in 8.2% of households currently, and 15.7% in the past year. There were no gender differences in prevalence of use, but women and older individuals reported significantly more perceived risk than men and younger individuals. Nearly half used alternative pain management, and received most information about prescription opioids from the radio (65.5%) and newsletters (13.5%). Despite their elevated age and working in an occupation at high risk of injury and chronic pain, study participants reported few opioid prescriptions and moderate use of alternative pain management. Perceived risk of prescription opioids may explain low prevalence. Outreach efforts that increase access to healthcare services and alternative pain management treatments for agricultural workers may mitigate the experience of chronic pain that can interfere with their overall quality of life.
2017 年,45%的农村成年人报告称受到阿片类药物流行的直接影响。虽然关于农村社区使用处方类阿片药物的经验的研究在不断增加,但对于一个可能存在高暴露率的独特亚人群了解较少:农村农业工人。本研究的目的是探讨农村生产者和农场工人中与处方类阿片药物相关的流行率和认知。2019 年春季和 2020 年春季,向居住在中西部上地区两个农业州之一的农村居民邮寄了一份问卷。如果其家庭任何成员从事农业行业,个人即可有资格参与。共收回了 1116 份问卷,回复率为 27.9%。参与者的平均年龄为 68.1 岁。大多数人是白人、男性和已婚。目前,8.2%的家庭中存在处方类阿片药物使用,过去一年中有 15.7%的家庭存在这种情况。在使用的普遍性方面,没有性别差异,但女性和老年人的感知风险明显高于男性和年轻人。近一半人使用替代疼痛管理方法,从广播(65.5%)和时事通讯(13.5%)获得关于处方类阿片药物的大部分信息。尽管他们年龄较大,从事受伤和慢性疼痛风险较高的职业,但研究参与者报告的阿片类药物处方较少,替代疼痛管理方法的使用适度。对处方类阿片药物的感知风险可能解释了低流行率的原因。为农业工人提供更多获得医疗保健服务和替代疼痛管理治疗的机会的宣传工作可能会减轻他们因慢性疼痛而对整体生活质量造成的影响。