Division of Hematologic Malignancy and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Division of Internal Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.
Transplant Cell Ther. 2022 Sep;28(9):523-529. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.05.043. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) is a major advance in managing aggressive relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphomas; however, relapses are frequent and pose a major therapeutic challenge. There is substantial variability across transplantation and cellular therapy programs in assessing and managing post-CAR-T failures. The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Committee on Practice Guidelines conducted an online cross-sectional survey between August 2021 and October 2021 to determine the U.S. lymphoma and transplantation and cellular therapy physicians' practice patterns for the detection and diagnosis of CAR-T failure, as well as management strategies for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in this particular setting. E-mail surveys were sent to 901 potential participants, of which 174 (19%) completed the survey. Responders were mainly White (51.2%), male (70.7%), and with >10 years of practice experience (51.2%). Overall, 87% of the responders were affiliated with university/teaching centers; 54.6% had general oncology practices, and 45.4% had lymphoma-focused transplantation/cellular therapy practices. The most common periods to perform surveillance scans were at 3 months and 12 months after CAR-T infusion. Overall, 88.5% of responders would often or always consider a biopsy to confirm relapse and 89% would routinely check for the persistence of the antigen targeted by the CAR (e.g., CD19 in the case of CD19 CAR-T). The most popular first salvage regimen for relapse or progression was an alternate CAR-T therapy (dual or alternate target) regardless of CD19 positivity. Twenty-seven percent of responders chose this regimen for CD19 positive relapse, whereas 31% of responders did so for CD19 negative relapse. Overall, 88.5% of responders favored consolidative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation after response to salvage, whereas 51.2% of physicians would consider autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in transplantation-naïve patients. There is substantial cross-center variation in surveillance, diagnosis, and management of CAR-T failure. Prospective clinical trials evaluating novel agents in this setting are urgently needed to identify best management strategies.
嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞疗法 (CAR-T) 是治疗侵袭性复发或难治性 B 细胞淋巴瘤的重大进展;然而,复发频繁,是一个主要的治疗挑战。在评估和管理 CAR-T 失败后,移植和细胞治疗项目之间存在很大的变异性。美国移植和细胞治疗学会实践指南委员会于 2021 年 8 月至 2021 年 10 月进行了一项在线横断面调查,以确定美国淋巴瘤和移植和细胞治疗医生在这种特殊情况下检测和诊断 CAR-T 失败以及弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤管理策略的实践模式。向 901 名潜在参与者发送了电子邮件调查,其中 174 名(19%)完成了调查。应答者主要是白人(51.2%),男性(70.7%),且具有 10 年以上的实践经验(51.2%)。总体而言,87%的应答者隶属于大学/教学中心;54.6%有普通肿瘤学实践,45.4%有专注于淋巴瘤的移植/细胞治疗实践。进行监测扫描的最常见时间是在 CAR-T 输注后 3 个月和 12 个月。总体而言,88.5%的应答者通常或总是会考虑进行活检以确认复发,89%的应答者会常规检查 CAR 靶向的抗原是否持续存在(例如,在 CD19 CAR-T 的情况下为 CD19)。复发或进展的最流行的一线挽救方案是另一种 CAR-T 治疗(双重或替代靶标),无论 CD19 阳性与否。27%的应答者选择这种方案治疗 CD19 阳性复发,而 31%的应答者选择这种方案治疗 CD19 阴性复发。总体而言,88.5%的应答者在挽救反应后赞成巩固性同种异体造血细胞移植,而 51.2%的医生会考虑在移植初治患者中进行自体造血细胞移植。在 CAR-T 失败的监测、诊断和管理方面存在很大的中心间差异。迫切需要在该环境中评估新型药物的前瞻性临床试验,以确定最佳管理策略。