Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University (Bennett, Karkada); Nova Scotia Health Trauma Program (Erdogan, Green), Nova Scotia Health; Departments of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care (Green), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS.
Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University (Bennett, Karkada); Nova Scotia Health Trauma Program (Erdogan, Green), Nova Scotia Health; Departments of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care (Green), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS
CMAJ Open. 2022 Jun 7;10(2):E500-E507. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210192. Print 2022 Apr-Jun.
Firearm misuse is common in cases of homicide, suicide and unintentional injury; this is a major public health issue, with societal and economic costs extending beyond the immediate injury or loss of life. We sought to review the evidence on the effectiveness of Canadian legislation in reducing deaths caused by firearms.
Five databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and Scopus) were searched from inception to May 2021 for studies evaluating the effect of Canadian gun control laws Bill C-51 (1977), Bill C-17 (1991) and Bill C-68 (1995) on rates of firearm-related death. Two reviewers performed article screening independently and in duplicate. We synthesized data using descriptive statistics. The primary outcome of interest was firearm-related mortality rates. Because of study heterogeneity, a meta-analysis was not performed.
Overall, 1479 articles were screened, and 18 studies were included. Ten studies examined the effect on homicides, of which 5 reported a reduction during the postlegislation period; 1 study reported evidence of substitution from firearms to other methods of homicide among people aged 15-24 years. Eleven studies evaluated the effect on suicides, with 9 finding a reduction in suicide rates. Eight of these studies reported evidence of substitution from firearms to other suicide methods. Two studies investigated accidental deaths; neither reported any benefit after legislation.
Evidence supporting the effectiveness of Canadian firearms legislation in the reduction of homicide and accidental death rates is inconclusive; a decrease in firearm-related suicide rates was observed by most studies, but evidence of method substitution was also identified. Re-evaluation of existing laws may be beneficial to build an improved and effective evidence-based national framework for prevention of gun violence.
CRD42020192486.
枪支滥用在凶杀、自杀和意外伤害中很常见;这是一个主要的公共卫生问题,其社会和经济成本超出了直接的伤害或生命损失。我们试图回顾加拿大立法在减少枪支造成的死亡方面的有效性的证据。
从建立到 2021 年 5 月,我们在五个数据库(PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、Web of Science 和 Scopus)中搜索评估加拿大枪支管制法案 C-51(1977 年)、C-17(1991 年)和 C-68(1995 年)对枪支相关死亡的影响的研究。两名审查员独立并重复进行文章筛选。我们使用描述性统计数据综合数据。主要关注的结果是与枪支有关的死亡率。由于研究的异质性,未进行荟萃分析。
总共筛选了 1479 篇文章,纳入了 18 项研究。10 项研究检查了对凶杀案的影响,其中 5 项报告立法后期间凶杀率有所下降;1 项研究报告称,在 15-24 岁的人群中,从枪支到其他凶杀方法的替代证据。11 项研究评估了对自杀的影响,其中 9 项发现自杀率有所下降。其中 8 项研究报告了从枪支到其他自杀方法的替代证据。两项研究调查了意外死亡;立法后都没有报告任何好处。
支持加拿大枪支立法在减少凶杀和意外死亡率方面有效性的证据是不确定的;大多数研究观察到与枪支有关的自杀率下降,但也发现了方法替代的证据。重新评估现有的法律可能有助于建立一个改进的、基于证据的、有效的国家枪支暴力预防框架。
CRD42020192486。