• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

院际直升机转运至三级儿科创伤中心。

Interfacility helicopter transport to a tertiary pediatric trauma center.

机构信息

Center for Surgical Outcomes Research, Abigail Wexner Research Institute, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Drive, Columbus, OH 43205, USA.

Center for Pediatric Trauma Research, Abigail Wexner Research Institute, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Drive, Columbus, OH 43205, USA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 2022 Nov;57(11):637-643. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2022.05.010. Epub 2022 May 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2022.05.010
PMID:35672168
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) are intended to expedite care to definitive management. Studies are inconclusive in demonstrating appropriate use. We aimed to examine emergent interventions after interfacility helicopter transport (IHT) to our pediatric trauma center.

METHODS

Trauma patients 0-18 years undergoing IHT or interfacility ground transport (IGT) to our institution from January 2011-December 2020 were studied. We evaluated the rate of IHT patients undergoing emergent (1 h), urgent (6 h), and semi urgent (48 h) operating room (OR) intervention compared to IGT as a measure of appropriate transport.

RESULTS

Inclusion was met by 1003 IHT and 7829 IGT patients. OR intervention was required in 29.6% of IHT patients, emergent in 1.3%, urgent in 12.6%, and semi urgent in 10.6%. Overall, IHT patients had higher mean injury severity score (ISS; IHT:14.5; SD:11.0 vs. IGT:6.0; SD:5.0; p < 0.01) and lower GCS (IHT:12.0; SD:4.9 vs. IGT:14.8; SD:1.4; p < 0.01), though over triage (ISS ≤ 15) occurred in 67.9% of patients.

CONCLUSION

More interfacility helicopter transport patients underwent emergent and urgent procedures compared to interfacility ground transport patients; however, emergent intervention was not required in 98.7% of interfacility helicopter transport patients and over two thirds had ISS ≤ 15, possibly suggesting overutilization of interfacility helicopter transport for pediatric trauma patients at our center.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

摘要

背景

直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)旨在加快对明确治疗的护理。研究结果尚无定论,无法证明其使用的合理性。我们旨在检查送往我们儿科创伤中心的患者在接受院际间直升机转运(IHT)后的紧急干预措施。

方法

研究对象为 2011 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间,在我院接受 IHT 或院际间地面转运(IGT)的 0-18 岁创伤患者。我们评估了与 IGT 相比,IHT 患者接受紧急(1 小时内)、紧急(6 小时内)和半紧急(48 小时内)手术室(OR)干预的比率,以作为适当转运的衡量标准。

结果

共纳入 1003 例 IHT 和 7829 例 IGT 患者。29.6%的 IHT 患者需要进行 OR 干预,其中 1.3%为紧急干预,12.6%为紧急干预,10.6%为半紧急干预。总体而言,IHT 患者的平均损伤严重程度评分(ISS;IHT:14.5,标准差:11.0 与 IGT:6.0,标准差:5.0;p<0.01)和格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS;IHT:12.0,标准差:4.9 与 IGT:14.8,标准差:1.4;p<0.01)更高,但超过分诊标准(ISS≤15)的患者占 67.9%。

结论

与院际间地面转运患者相比,更多的院际间直升机转运患者接受了紧急和紧急手术;然而,在 98.7%的院际间直升机转运患者中并未需要紧急干预,超过三分之二的患者 ISS≤15,这可能表明在我们中心,对儿科创伤患者过度使用了院际间直升机转运。

证据水平

III 级。

相似文献

1
Interfacility helicopter transport to a tertiary pediatric trauma center.院际直升机转运至三级儿科创伤中心。
J Pediatr Surg. 2022 Nov;57(11):637-643. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2022.05.010. Epub 2022 May 16.
2
Interfacility transfer of pediatric trauma patients by helicopter does not predict the need for urgent intervention.通过直升机进行儿科创伤患者的机构间转运并不能预测是否需要紧急干预。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 Jun;29(6):729-36. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318294ddcc.
3
Helicopter interfacility transport of pediatric trauma patients: Are we overusing a costly resource?儿科创伤患者的直升机机构间转运:我们是否在过度使用一种昂贵的资源?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Feb;80(2):313-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000904.
4
Evaluation of statewide utilization of helicopter emergency medical services for interfacility transfer.全州范围内直升机紧急医疗服务用于医疗机构间转运的使用情况评估。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Sep 1;91(3):496-500. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003309.
5
Comparison of helicopter versus ground transport for the interfacility transport of isolated spinal injury.直升机与地面交通工具用于院间转运孤立性脊柱损伤患者的比较
Spine J. 2014 Jul 1;14(7):1147-54. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.478. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
6
Helicopter overtriage in pediatric trauma.儿科创伤中的直升机过度分诊
J Pediatr Surg. 2014 Nov;49(11):1673-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.08.008. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
7
Association of Interfacility Helicopter versus Ground Ambulance Transport and in-Hospital Mortality among Trauma Patients.创伤患者的院际直升机转运与地面救护车转运和院内死亡率的关联。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2021 Sep-Oct;25(5):620-628. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2020.1817215. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
8
Helicopters improve survival in seriously injured patients requiring interfacility transfer for definitive care.直升机可提高需要进行院间转运以接受确定性治疗的重伤患者的生存率。
J Trauma. 2011 Feb;70(2):310-4. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182032b4f.
9
When birds can't fly: an analysis of interfacility ground transport using advanced life support when helicopter emergency medical service is unavailable.当鸟儿无法飞翔时:在直升机紧急医疗服务无法提供的情况下,对使用高级生命支持的机构间地面运输的分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Aug;77(2):331-6; discussion 336-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000295.
10
Pediatric trauma patients are more likely to be discharged from the emergency department after arrival by helicopter emergency medical services.儿科创伤患者在通过直升机紧急医疗服务到达后更有可能从急诊部门出院。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Mar;74(3):917-20. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31827e19a4.

引用本文的文献

1
Appropriately Matching Transport Care Units to Patients in Interhospital Transport Care: Implementation Study.在院际转运护理中为患者合理匹配转运护理单元:实施研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Dec 13;8:e65626. doi: 10.2196/65626.