• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疾病、表型和放射诊断综合本体中的因果关系分析。

Analysis of Causal Relationships in Integrated Ontologies of Diseases, Phenotypes, and Radiological Diagnosis.

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Institute for Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Jun 6;290:258-262. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220074.

DOI:10.3233/SHTI220074
PMID:35673013
Abstract

Biomedical ontologies encode knowledge in a form that makes it computable. The current study used the integration of three large biomedical ontologies-the Disease Ontology (DO), Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO), and Radiology Gamuts Ontology (RGO)-to explore inferred causal relationships between high-level DO and HPO concepts. The principal DO categories were defined as the 7 direct subclasses of the top-level Disease class, excluding Disease of anatomical entity, plus the 12 direct subclasses of the latter term. The principal HPO categories were defined as the 25 direct subclasses of HPO's Phenotypic abnormality class. All causal relationships were tallied between members of the DO and HPO principal categories through their causal relationships in RGO. The analysis provides an understanding of the hierarchical organization of RGO terms, and offers insights into new relationships between DO and HPO classes.

摘要

生物医学本体论以可计算的形式对知识进行编码。本研究通过整合三个大型生物医学本体论——疾病本体论(DO)、人类表型本体论(HPO)和放射学范围本体论(RGO)——来探索 DO 高级别概念和 HPO 概念之间推断的因果关系。主要的 DO 类别被定义为顶级疾病类别的 7 个直接子类,不包括解剖实体的疾病,加上后者的 12 个直接子类。主要的 HPO 类别被定义为 HPO 表型异常类别的 25 个直接子类。通过 RGO 中的因果关系,在 DO 和 HPO 主要类别成员之间对所有因果关系进行了汇总。该分析提供了对 RGO 术语的层次结构组织的理解,并为 DO 和 HPO 类别之间的新关系提供了见解。

相似文献

1
Analysis of Causal Relationships in Integrated Ontologies of Diseases, Phenotypes, and Radiological Diagnosis.疾病、表型和放射诊断综合本体中的因果关系分析。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Jun 6;290:258-262. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220074.
2
Integrating ontologies of human diseases, phenotypes, and radiological diagnosis.整合人类疾病、表型和放射诊断的本体论。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Feb 1;26(2):149-154. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy161.
3
Integrating an Ontology of Radiology Differential Diagnosis with ICD-10-CM, RadLex, and SNOMED CT.将放射学鉴别诊断本体与 ICD-10-CM、RadLex 和 SNOMED CT 集成。
J Digit Imaging. 2019 Apr;32(2):206-210. doi: 10.1007/s10278-019-00186-3.
4
Integrating ontologies of rare diseases and radiological diagnosis.整合罕见病与放射诊断的本体论。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Nov;22(6):1164-8. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv020. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
5
Transitive closure of subsumption and causal relations in a large ontology of radiological diagnosis.大型放射诊断本体中包含关系和因果关系的传递闭包
J Biomed Inform. 2016 Jun;61:27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.03.015. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
6
Biomedical Ontologies to Guide AI Development in Radiology.生物医学本体在放射学中的人工智能开发中的指导作用。
J Digit Imaging. 2021 Dec;34(6):1331-1341. doi: 10.1007/s10278-021-00527-1. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
7
Expansion of the Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) knowledge base and resources.人类表型本体(HPO)知识库和资源的扩展。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jan 8;47(D1):D1018-D1027. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1105.
8
HPO2Vec+: Leveraging heterogeneous knowledge resources to enrich node embeddings for the Human Phenotype Ontology.HPO2Vec+:利用异构知识资源丰富人类表型本体的节点嵌入。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Aug;96:103246. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103246. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
9
Causal Associations Among Diseases and Imaging Findings in Radiology Reports.放射科报告中的疾病与影像学表现之间的因果关联。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 May 25;294:411-412. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220487.
10
Informatics in radiology: radiology gamuts ontology: differential diagnosis for the Semantic Web.放射学信息学:放射学范围本体论:语义网的鉴别诊断。
Radiographics. 2014 Jan-Feb;34(1):254-64. doi: 10.1148/rg.341135036. Epub 2013 Nov 29.