• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

涉及老年人参与电子医疗保健工具开发的共同设计方法:系统评价。

Co-Design Approaches Involving Older Adults in the Development of Electronic Healthcare Tools: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Carolina Health Informatics Program, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Jun 6;290:1112-1113. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220293.

DOI:10.3233/SHTI220293
PMID:35673231
Abstract

We present evidence on the current state of utilizing co-design approaches involving older adults in developing electronic healthcare tools (EHTs). Research gaps were identified in defining the stages, involvement processes, and levels of participation using existing theoretical frameworks. Future studies should explore both involvement processes and levels of participation to optimally empower and collaborate with older adults in developing EHTs.

摘要

我们提供了利用涉及老年人的共同设计方法来开发电子医疗保健工具 (EHTs) 的当前状态的证据。在使用现有理论框架定义阶段、参与过程和参与水平方面,发现了研究差距。未来的研究应该探索参与过程和参与水平,以优化老年人在开发 EHTs 方面的赋权和协作。

相似文献

1
Co-Design Approaches Involving Older Adults in the Development of Electronic Healthcare Tools: A Systematic Review.涉及老年人参与电子医疗保健工具开发的共同设计方法:系统评价。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Jun 6;290:1112-1113. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220293.
2
Codesign approaches involving older adults in the development of electronic healthcare tools: a systematic review.涉及老年人参与电子医疗工具开发的共同设计方法:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 6;12(7):e058390. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058390.
3
Making change last? Exploring the value of sustainability approaches in healthcare: a scoping review.让变革持续?探索医疗保健领域可持续发展方法的价值:一项范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Oct 13;18(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00601-0.
4
Safety and Quality Within the Healthcare Supply Chain: A Great Unknown.医疗供应链中的安全与质量:一个巨大的未知。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024 Jan 25;310:364-368. doi: 10.3233/SHTI230988.
5
Service design in the healthcare space with a special focus on non-clinical service departments: A synthesis and future directions.医疗保健领域的服务设计,特别关注非临床服务部门:综合与未来方向。
Health Serv Manage Res. 2022 May;35(2):83-91. doi: 10.1177/09514848211010250. Epub 2021 May 9.
6
How and how well have older people been engaged in healthcare intervention design, development or delivery using co-methodologies: A scoping review with narrative summary.老年人如何以及在多大程度上使用共同方法学参与医疗保健干预措施的设计、开发或提供:一项具有叙述性总结的范围综述。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Feb;30(2):776-798. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13199. Epub 2020 Oct 25.
7
Theoretical approaches to process evaluations of complex interventions in health care: a systematic scoping review protocol.医疗保健中复杂干预措施过程评估的理论方法:一项系统综述方案
Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 8;10(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01825-z.
8
Blockchain technology in healthcare: A systematic review.区块链技术在医疗保健中的应用:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 11;17(4):e0266462. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266462. eCollection 2022.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Developing Innovative Solutions for Universal Design in Healthcare and Other Sectors.开发医疗保健和其他领域通用设计的创新解决方案。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Sep 2;297:340-347. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220858.

引用本文的文献

1
An umbrella review on how digital health intervention co-design is conducted and described.关于数字健康干预协同设计如何开展及描述的一项伞状综述。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Dec 23;7(1):374. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01385-1.