Knowledge gaps in diabetes research: an evidence mapping of the literature.

BACKGROUND

Mapping the available evidence can be used to inform current diabetes research, identify relevant gaps, and prioritize future research. In this regard, we mapped diabetes research performed in Iran.

METHOD

We searched the Scopus and PubMed databases from 01/01/2015 till 01/01/2020 using keywords such as diabetes and Iran. The included articles were classified according to their document types, level of evidence, and subject areas.

RESULTS

The majority of the included articles (53%) were related to diabetes types, followed by complications (28%). Most of the documents were original articles (82%), and reviews were 18% of the publications. Systematic reviews constitute only 6% of the total documents. Observational studies were the most common types of study designs (26%), followed by clinical trials (20%). Moreover, topics on control and management of diabetes were the most prevalent subject areas (58%), and fewer studies were on preventive strategies (6%). In diabetes management studies, less attention has been paid to evaluate psychological (10%), educational (9%), and physical activity-related (7%) interventions. There was a shortage of secondary studies related to physical activity, psychology, diagnostic, and screening-related studies.

CONCLUSION

To fill diabetes research gaps, more investment in cost-effectiveness interventions, such as preventive strategies and behavioral self-management programs, need. Moreover, we need to pay more attention on applied sciences and real world evidence to bridge translational gaps from bench to bedside. In this regard, further data synthesis can be helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of the available studies and avoiding unnecessary investigations.