Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Vet Surg. 2022 Aug;51(6):891-902. doi: 10.1111/vsu.13839. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
To evaluate previously published predictive survival models in a population of horses undergoing colic surgery in the midwestern United States.
Retrospective cohort study; single referral hospital.
A total of 260 horses met the inclusion criteria.
Medical records of horses undergoing surgical treatment for colic were reviewed. Previously published models were applied to cohort data to predict outcome. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy for prediction of short-term survival were calculated.
Single-variable and multivariable models performed similarly for prediction of survival, with a mean 79% sensitivity (range: 44%-94%), 48% specificity (range: 22%-83%), 63% PPV (range: 56%-72%), 73% NPV (range: 60%-83%), and 64% accuracy (range: 59%-72%). Blood lactate ≤6 mmol/l and the colic severity score (CSS) were highly sensitive for prediction of survival; however, both had poor specificity.
Single-variable and multivariable predictive models did not perform as well for prediction of survival in the study cohort compared to original reports, suggesting that population-specific factors contribute to patient survival.
Predictive models of survival developed in one population may be less reliable when used to predict outcome in horses undergoing colic surgery from an independent population. Additional model testing and refinement using data from multiple surgical centers could be considered to improve prediction of outcome for horses undergoing laparotomy for treatment of colic.
评估在美国中西部接受腹部外科手术的马的人群中先前发表的预测生存模型。
回顾性队列研究;单转诊医院。
共有 260 匹马符合纳入标准。
回顾性分析接受外科治疗的马的病历。将先前发表的模型应用于队列数据以预测结果。计算短期生存预测的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和准确性。
单变量和多变量模型在预测生存方面表现相似,平均敏感性为 79%(范围:44%-94%),特异性为 48%(范围:22%-83%),PPV 为 63%(范围:56%-72%),NPV 为 73%(范围:60%-83%),准确性为 64%(范围:59%-72%)。血乳酸≤6mmol/L 和绞痛严重程度评分(CSS)对生存预测具有高度敏感性;然而,两者特异性都较差。
与原始报告相比,单变量和多变量预测模型在研究队列中预测生存的性能不如预期,这表明人群特定因素会影响患者的生存。
在使用来自独立人群的接受腹部外科手术的马来预测预后时,在一个人群中开发的生存预测模型可能不太可靠。可以考虑使用来自多个外科中心的数据来进一步测试和改进模型,以提高对接受剖腹术治疗绞痛的马的预后预测。