• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究无性恋者和异性恋者的视觉注意力模式。

Examining Visual Attention Patterns among Asexual and Heterosexual Individuals.

作者信息

Milani Sonia, Zhang Jia Yu, Zdaniuk Bozena, Bogaert Anthony, Rieger Gerulf, Brotto Lori A

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia.

Department of Health Sciences, Brock University.

出版信息

J Sex Res. 2023 Feb;60(2):271-281. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2022.2078768. Epub 2022 Jun 8.

DOI:10.1080/00224499.2022.2078768
PMID:35674497
Abstract

Asexuality has garnered much attention, and empirical data support its classification as a sexual orientation. Asexuality is defined as a lack of sexual attraction to others, with approximately 1% of the population falling in this category. As theoretical models situate attention as a central component of sexual response, the current study examined attentional processing of erotic stimuli in asexuals and heterosexuals. We hypothesized that heterosexual participants would have initial and controlled visual attention patterns favoring erotic images over non-erotic images. We predicted that asexual participants would have significantly smaller or non-existent differences in attention to erotic versus non-erotic images. Ninety-five adults completed an eye-tracking task viewing erotic and non-erotic images. Eye-tracking data showed no group differences in initial attention to erotic images. For controlled attention, there was a large effect size in the hypothesized direction. Heterosexual participants exhibited more and longer fixations on erotic images, whereas asexuals exhibited a more even distribution of attention across image types. Exploratory analysis of group differences in the association between visual attention and ratings of sexual attractiveness revealed a complex pattern of differences, with some indication of a stronger association between total fixation and sexual attraction for heterosexual participants. These findings suggest that differences in attention to sexual stimuli may represent key underlying differences between asexual and allosexual orientation. Findings also contribute to the larger literature on visual attention and attraction.

摘要

无性取向已引起广泛关注,实证数据支持将其归类为一种性取向。无性取向被定义为对他人缺乏性吸引力,约1%的人口属于这一类别。由于理论模型将注意力视为性反应的核心组成部分,本研究考察了无性恋者和异性恋者对色情刺激的注意力加工。我们假设异性恋参与者在初始和控制性视觉注意模式上会更倾向于色情图像而非非色情图像。我们预测无性恋参与者对色情图像和非色情图像的注意力差异会显著更小或不存在。95名成年人完成了一项观看色情和非色情图像的眼动追踪任务。眼动追踪数据显示,两组在对色情图像的初始注意力上没有差异。对于控制性注意力,在假设方向上有较大的效应量。异性恋参与者对色情图像的注视更多、持续时间更长,而无性恋者对不同类型图像的注意力分布更为均匀。对视觉注意力与性吸引力评分之间关联的组间差异进行的探索性分析揭示了一种复杂的差异模式,有迹象表明异性恋参与者的总注视时间与性吸引力之间的关联更强。这些发现表明,对性刺激的注意力差异可能代表了无性取向和有性取向之间的关键潜在差异。研究结果也为关于视觉注意力和吸引力的更广泛文献做出了贡献。

相似文献

1
Examining Visual Attention Patterns among Asexual and Heterosexual Individuals.研究无性恋者和异性恋者的视觉注意力模式。
J Sex Res. 2023 Feb;60(2):271-281. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2022.2078768. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
2
Asexuality vs. sexual interest/arousal disorder: Examining group differences in initial attention to sexual stimuli.无性与性兴趣/唤起障碍:研究初始对性刺激注意的群体差异。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 16;16(12):e0261434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261434. eCollection 2021.
3
Cognitive processing of sexual cues in asexual individuals and heterosexual women with desire/arousal difficulties.无性个体和有欲望/唤起困难的异性恋女性对性线索的认知加工。
PLoS One. 2021 May 12;16(5):e0251074. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251074. eCollection 2021.
4
Visual Attention to Sexual Stimuli in Mostly Heterosexuals.大多数异性恋者对性刺激的视觉注意力。
Arch Sex Behav. 2019 Jul;48(5):1371-1385. doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-1419-4. Epub 2019 May 29.
5
Detection of differential viewing patterns to erotic and non-erotic stimuli using eye-tracking methodology.使用眼动追踪方法检测对色情和非色情刺激的不同观看模式。
Arch Sex Behav. 2006 Oct;35(5):569-75. doi: 10.1007/s10508-006-9065-z.
6
Sex differences in visual attention to erotic and non-erotic stimuli.对色情和非色情刺激的视觉注意力中的性别差异。
Arch Sex Behav. 2008 Apr;37(2):219-28. doi: 10.1007/s10508-007-9208-x. Epub 2007 Aug 1.
7
To What Extent Do Erotic Images Elicit Visuospatial versus Cognitive Attentional Processes? Consistent Support for a (Non-Spatial) Sexual Content-Induced Delay.色情图像在多大程度上引发了视空间与认知注意力过程?一致的支持表明,(非空间的)性内容会引起延迟。
Arch Sex Behav. 2020 Feb;49(2):531-550. doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-01512-0. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
8
Understanding heterosexual women's erotic flexibility: the role of attention in sexual evaluations and neural responses to sexual stimuli.理解异性恋女性的性灵活性:注意力在性评价和性刺激的神经反应中的作用。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2020 Jun 23;15(4):447-465. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa058.
9
Heterosexual men's anger in response to male homosexuality: effects of erotic and non-erotic depictions of male-male intimacy and sexual prejudice.异性恋男性对男同性恋的愤怒:色情和非色情的男男性行为描绘以及性偏见的影响。
J Homosex. 2010;57(8):1022-38. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2010.503511.
10
Brain response to visual sexual stimuli in heterosexual and homosexual males.异性恋和同性恋男性大脑对视觉性刺激的反应。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2008 Jun;29(6):726-35. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20435.