Vargas-Escobar Lina María, Valle-Ballesteros Ruth, Alemán-Parra Claudia Marcela, Parrado-Sarmiento Ana Cristina, Cortes-Muñoz Fabián, Sánchez-Casas Carolina
PhD, RN, Titular Professor, School of Nursing, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.
MSc, RN, Titular Professor, School of Nursing, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.
J Nurs Res. 2022 Aug 1;30(4):e224. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000504.
Multiple factors affect treatment adherence in individuals with cardiovascular disease. However, information on the relationships among treatment adherence, family functioning, and self-care agency in these patients and their families is limited.
This study was developed to determine the relationships among treatment adherence, family functioning, self-care agency, and sociodemographic variables in patients with cardiovascular disease. Self-care agency, as defined by Orem, is the dynamic process patients use to engage in their own healthcare that involves discerning and addressing factors that allow their making decisions that improve self-care abilities.
This cross-sectional, observational-analytical study enrolled 151 adult patients with cardiovascular diseases who had undergone pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments and 108 family members of these patients who had consented to participate. Measurements were performed using the "Questionnaire for measuring treatment adherence in patients with cardiovascular disease," the "Family Functioning Assessment Scale," and the "Self-care Agency Scale."
Of the 151 patients, 119 (78.8%) were assessed as having a low risk of nonadherence, 60 (39.7%) as having low family functioning, and 131 (86.8%) as having high self-care agency. Treatment adherence and self-care agency showed a moderate and significant correlation ( r = .66, p < .001). Similarly, treatment adherence and family functioning showed a low but significant correlation ( r = .35, p < .001). Moreover, significant multivariate associations were found among the variables of interest. Patients with a low risk of nonadherence were found to be more likely to have a secondary or postsecondary education, not to have vision or hearing problems, and to have a contributory affiliation mode with the health system or private health insurance. In addition, participants with moderate or high levels of family functioning were less likely to be workers or to not have hearing or vision problems. Finally, significant differences were noted between patients with low self-care agency and those with high self-care agency in terms of kinship relationship with family members and affiliation mode with the health system.
CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The results of this research help clarify the issue of treatment adherence in patients with cardiovascular disease. Although family functioning and self-care agency were found to be low to moderately correlated with treatment adherence, relevant information regarding these variables and sociodemographic variables is presented in this study. Nurses may use these results as a reference to design nursing care plans and interventions to address the conditions of their patients more appropriately.
多种因素影响心血管疾病患者的治疗依从性。然而,关于这些患者及其家庭中治疗依从性、家庭功能和自我护理能力之间关系的信息有限。
本研究旨在确定心血管疾病患者的治疗依从性、家庭功能、自我护理能力和社会人口统计学变量之间的关系。按照奥瑞姆的定义,自我护理能力是患者用于参与自身医疗保健的动态过程,包括识别和解决那些能让他们做出改善自我护理能力决策的因素。
这项横断面观察分析研究纳入了151名接受过药物和非药物治疗的成年心血管疾病患者以及108名同意参与的患者家属。使用“心血管疾病患者治疗依从性测量问卷”“家庭功能评估量表”和“自我护理能力量表”进行测量。
在151名患者中,119名(78.8%)被评估为非依从风险低,60名(39.7%)家庭功能低,131名(86.8%)自我护理能力高。治疗依从性与自我护理能力呈中度显著相关(r = 0.66,p < 0.001)。同样,治疗依从性与家庭功能呈低度但显著相关(r = 0.35,p < 0.001)。此外,在感兴趣的变量之间发现了显著的多变量关联。发现非依从风险低的患者更有可能接受过中等或高等教育,没有视力或听力问题,并且与卫生系统或私人医疗保险有缴费型隶属模式。此外,家庭功能中等或较高水平的参与者不太可能是工人或没有听力或视力问题。最后,自我护理能力低的患者与自我护理能力高的患者在与家庭成员的亲属关系以及与卫生系统的隶属模式方面存在显著差异。
结论/对实践的启示:本研究结果有助于阐明心血管疾病患者的治疗依从性问题。虽然发现家庭功能和自我护理能力与治疗依从性呈低度至中度相关,但本研究提供了有关这些变量和社会人口统计学变量的相关信息。护士可以将这些结果作为参考,以设计护理计划和干预措施,更恰当地应对患者的情况。