Department of Neurology, Gwangju-Jeonnam Regional Cerebrovascular Center, Chonnam National University Medical School, Chonnam National University Hospital, 42 Jebongro, Dong-gu, Gwangju, 61469, Korea.
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Chonnam National University, 77 Yongbongro, Buk-gu, Gwangju, 61186, Korea.
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 8;12(1):9420. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13636-w.
Clustering stroke patients with similar characteristics to predict subsequent vascular outcome events is critical. This study aimed to compare several clustering methods, particularly a deep neural network-based model, and identify the best clustering method with a maximally distinct 1-year outcome in patients with ischemic stroke. Prospective stroke registry data from a comprehensive stroke center from January 2011 to July 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with acute ischemic stroke within 7 days of onset were included. The primary outcomes were the composite of all strokes (either hemorrhagic or ischemic), myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality within one year. Neural network-based clustering models (deep lifetime clustering) were compared with other clustering models (k-prototype and semi-supervised clustering, SSC) and a conventional risk score (Stroke Prognostic Instrument-II, SPI-II) to obtain a distinct distribution of 1-year vascular events. Ultimately, 7,650 patients were included, and the 1-year primary outcome event occurred in 13.1%. The DLC-Kuiper UB model had a significantly higher C-index (0.674), log-rank score (153.1), and Brier score (0.08) than the other cluster models (SSC and DLC-MMD) and the SPI-II score. There were significant differences in primary outcome events among the 3 clusters (41.7%, 13.4%, and 6.5% in clusters 0, 1, and 2, respectively) when the DLC-Kuiper UB model was used. A neural network-based clustering model, the DLC-Kuiper UB model, can improve the clustering of stroke patients with a maximally distinct distribution of 1-year vascular outcomes among each cluster. Further studies are warranted to validate this deep neural network-based clustering model in ischemic stroke.
对具有相似特征的中风患者进行聚类以预测随后的血管事件结果至关重要。本研究旨在比较几种聚类方法,特别是基于深度神经网络的模型,并确定在缺血性中风患者中具有最大 1 年预后差异的最佳聚类方法。回顾性分析了 2011 年 1 月至 2018 年 7 月期间来自综合中风中心的前瞻性中风登记数据。纳入发病后 7 天内发生急性缺血性中风的患者。主要结局为 1 年内所有中风(出血性或缺血性)、心肌梗死和全因死亡率的复合结局。将基于神经网络的聚类模型(深度终生聚类)与其他聚类模型(k-原型和半监督聚类、SSC)和传统风险评分(中风预后工具 II,SPI-II)进行比较,以获得 1 年血管事件的明显分布。最终纳入 7650 例患者,1 年主要结局事件发生率为 13.1%。DLC-Kuiper UB 模型的 C 指数(0.674)、对数秩评分(153.1)和 Brier 评分(0.08)显著高于其他聚类模型(SSC 和 DLC-MMD)和 SPI-II 评分。当使用 DLC-Kuiper UB 模型时,3 个聚类组的主要结局事件存在显著差异(聚类 0、1 和 2 中的发生率分别为 41.7%、13.4%和 6.5%)。基于神经网络的聚类模型,即 DLC-Kuiper UB 模型,可以改善中风患者的聚类,使每个聚类中 1 年血管预后的分布最大程度地不同。需要进一步的研究来验证这种基于深度神经网络的聚类模型在缺血性中风中的应用。