• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾脏和肝脏中谷胱甘肽库对耗竭处理的反应变化

Renal and hepatic glutathione pool modifications in response to depletion treatments.

作者信息

Rodríguez J V, Torres A M, Elías M M

出版信息

Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1987 Jan;65(1):84-6. doi: 10.1139/y87-016.

DOI:10.1139/y87-016
PMID:3567725
Abstract

In this study we examined the response of the renal and hepatic glutathione (GSH) pool in rats to drastic GSH depletion treatments. For this purpose, we used a protein-free diet, starvation, and the injection of varying doses of diethyl maleate as depleting agents. We analysed GSH levels in both kidney and liver tissue homogenates after rats were fed a protein-free diet for 2 or 7 days or starved for 1, 2, or 3 days, as well as after diethyl maleate administration in a single maximal dose or in varying doses. The results indicated that the liver GSH pool was always more labile than the kidney GSH pool. Moreover, kidney GSH levels were almost unchanged after 7 days on a protein-free diet or after 2 days of starvation, while liver showed significant changes in GSH levels. When we analysed the repletion rate, kidney had higher kinetic parameters (k = 0.148 h-1) than liver (0.097 h-1). We conclude that efficient mechanisms of maintaining GSH levels exist in the kidney and these may serve to avoid GSH diminution and hence preserve renal function during states of GSH depletion.

摘要

在本研究中,我们检测了大鼠肾和肝中谷胱甘肽(GSH)库对剧烈GSH耗竭处理的反应。为此,我们采用无蛋白饮食、饥饿以及注射不同剂量的马来酸二乙酯作为耗竭剂。在大鼠接受无蛋白饮食2天或7天、饥饿1天、2天或3天之后,以及在给予单次最大剂量或不同剂量的马来酸二乙酯之后,我们分析了肾和肝组织匀浆中的GSH水平。结果表明,肝脏GSH库总是比肾脏GSH库更不稳定。此外,无蛋白饮食7天后或饥饿2天后,肾脏GSH水平几乎没有变化,而肝脏的GSH水平则出现了显著变化。当我们分析补充率时,肾脏的动力学参数(k = 0.148 h-1)高于肝脏(0.097 h-1)。我们得出结论,肾脏中存在维持GSH水平的有效机制,这些机制可能有助于避免GSH减少,从而在GSH耗竭状态下保护肾功能。

相似文献

1
Renal and hepatic glutathione pool modifications in response to depletion treatments.肾脏和肝脏中谷胱甘肽库对耗竭处理的反应变化
Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1987 Jan;65(1):84-6. doi: 10.1139/y87-016.
2
Effects of buthionine sulfoximine and diethyl maleate on glutathione turnover in the channel catfish.丁硫氨酸亚砜胺和马来酸二乙酯对沟鲶谷胱甘肽周转的影响。
Biochem Pharmacol. 1992 May 28;43(10):2209-15. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(92)90180-q.
3
Glutathione and cysteine depletion in rats and mice following acute intoxication with diethylmaleate.
Biochem Pharmacol. 1992 Feb 4;43(3):451-6. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(92)90563-x.
4
Prostacyclin elevation following glutathione depletion in vivo. Possible threshold dependency in liver and lung.体内谷胱甘肽耗竭后前列环素升高。肝脏和肺中可能存在阈值依赖性。
Biochem Pharmacol. 1993 Sep 14;46(6):1019-27. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(93)90666-k.
5
Differential lipid peroxidative response of rat liver and lung tissues to glutathione depletion induced in vivo by diethyl maleate: effect of the antioxidant flavonoid (+)-cyanidanol-3.大鼠肝脏和肺组织对马来酸二乙酯体内诱导的谷胱甘肽耗竭的脂质过氧化差异反应:抗氧化剂类黄酮(+)-氰定醇-3的作用。
Biochem Int. 1985 Mar;10(3):425-33.
6
Effect of glutathione depletion on tissue and plasma prostacyclin and thromboxane in rats.
Biochem Pharmacol. 1992 Mar 3;43(5):1043-51. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(92)90611-l.
7
Effect of oral glutathione on hepatic glutathione levels in rats and mice.
Br J Nutr. 1989 Nov;62(3):683-91. doi: 10.1079/bjn19890068.
8
Renal and hepatic glutathione concentrations in rats after treatment with hexachloro-1,3-butadiene and citrinin.
Arch Toxicol. 1984 Nov;56(1):46-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00316352.
9
Sequential changes in hepatic and renal glutathione and development of renal karyomegaly in 1-cyano-3,4-epithiobutane toxicity in rats.大鼠1-氰基-3,4-环氧硫丁烷中毒时肝脏和肾脏谷胱甘肽的序贯变化及肾脏核肿大的发展
Food Chem Toxicol. 1989 Nov;27(11):731-9. doi: 10.1016/0278-6915(89)90078-1.
10
Glutathione depletion and resynthesis in laboratory animals.实验动物体内谷胱甘肽的消耗与再合成
Drug Chem Toxicol. 1984;7(4):345-55. doi: 10.3109/01480548408998263.