Tolou-Shams Marina, Bath Eraka, McPhee Jeanne, Folk Johanna B, Porche Michelle V, Fortuna Lisa R
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Department of Psychiatry, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Front Digit Health. 2022 May 23;4:867366. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.867366. eCollection 2022.
Separating children from families has deleterious effects on children's mental health and well-being, which is highly relevant for youth in juvenile detention and other out-of-home residential placements. Despite growth in the evidence of family-based interventions in mitigating adverse behavioral health outcomes for justice involved adolescents (JIA), gaps remain in intervention dissemination for JIA; this particularly true for those leveraging digital health technologies, a need that has intensified with the COVID-19 pandemic. Use of digital health technologies for JIAs is pressing to address structural barriers in maintaining JIA-family connections, but also to improve treatment access for detained JIAs. Court systems' capacity to support use of digital health tools, such as telehealth, appear promising. Data on the use of tele-conferencing in U.S. juvenile and family courts were collected from 456 juvenile justice professionals as part of a larger study on judicial decision making. Results suggest overwhelming adoption of video-conferencing for court hearings with only 40% of respondents reporting family court use prior to the onset of COVID-19, but majority (91%) now reporting its routine use. Youth participate from a range of settings, including detention, other residential placement, community-based behavioral health and in-home settings. The COVID-19 pandemic has created a shift in the uptake of video-conferencing platforms that could hold promise for future larger scale use across the juvenile justice system. Findings underscore feasibility and acceptability of technology requirements in key settings that should be leveraged for broad scale implementation of empirically supported family-based interventions to advance behavioral health equity for JIA.
将儿童与家庭分离会对儿童的心理健康和幸福产生有害影响,这与被拘留青少年及其他家庭外寄宿安置中的青少年高度相关。尽管有越来越多的证据表明基于家庭的干预措施可减轻涉司法青少年(JIA)的不良行为健康后果,但在JIA的干预措施传播方面仍存在差距;对于那些利用数字健康技术的措施而言尤其如此,随着新冠疫情的爆发,这一需求变得更加迫切。对JIA使用数字健康技术不仅迫切需要解决维持JIA与家庭联系方面的结构性障碍,还需要改善被拘留JIA获得治疗的机会。法院系统支持使用远程医疗等数字健康工具的能力似乎很有前景。作为一项关于司法决策的更大规模研究的一部分,我们从456名青少年司法专业人员那里收集了美国青少年和家庭法院使用电话会议的数据。结果表明,视频会议在法庭听证会上被广泛采用,只有40%的受访者报告在新冠疫情爆发前家庭法院使用过视频会议,但现在大多数(91%)报告其经常使用。青少年参与的环境多种多样,包括拘留所、其他寄宿安置场所、社区行为健康机构和家庭环境。新冠疫情导致视频会议平台的使用发生了转变,这可能为未来在整个青少年司法系统中更大规模的使用带来希望。研究结果强调了关键环境中技术要求的可行性和可接受性,应利用这些要求广泛实施基于家庭的实证支持干预措施,以促进JIA的行为健康公平。