Gautam Samikshya, Tiwari Ujjal, Sapkota Bina, Sharma Bala, Parajuli Sapna, Pandit Naba Raj, Gaihre Yam Kanta, Dhakal Krishna
Faculty of Agriculture, Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur, 44209 Chitwan, Nepal.
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre, 44705 Lalitpur, Nepal.
Heliyon. 2022 Jun 1;8(6):e09566. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09566. eCollection 2022 Jun.
Several innovative fertilizers and application methods, along with different decision support tools have been developed to improve nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and crop yields, but their comparative study in maize is yet to be done in Nepal. Thus, we evaluated different slow-release N fertilizers and decision-making tools for real-time N management compared with the common urea on their effectiveness in increasing NUE, grain yield and economic return of spring maize ( L. cv. Rampur Hybrid-10). A field trial was conducted at Dang Valley of Nepal in a Randomized complete block design with three replications and seven treatments; N omission- (0 kg N ha), normal urea at 120 kg N ha (recommended dose, N120), and 180 kg N ha(N180), Polymer Coated Urea (PCU- 90 kg N ha), Urea Briquette-deep placement (UDP- 90 kg N ha), GreenSeeker (GS- 143 kg N ha) and Leaf Color Chart based N management (LCC- 143 kg N ha). N application based on decision support tools (LCC and GS) and innovative fertilizers (UDP, PCU) yielded 17.35-45.81% more grain yield than recommended dose (RDF). The real time nitrogen application through LCC and GreenSeeker and slow release N fertilizer (PCU and UDP) resulted in higher agronomic efficiency of nitrogen- AEN (21.30-27.82 kg grain kg N) compared to RDF (12.15 kg grain kg N) and N180 (19.87 kg grain kg N). UDP, with 25% less N compared to RDF, resulted in higher grain yield (5.25 t ha), partial factor productivity of N- PFPN (58.37 kg grain kg N) and AEN (27.82 kg grain kg N). Based on the economic return and ease in the application, both UDP and LCC based N application seem promising in Nepalese conditions. However, their effectiveness should be validated across diverse agro-ecologies, soil types and climatic conditions for a general recommendation.
为提高氮素利用效率(NUE)和作物产量,已开发出几种创新型肥料及施用方法,还有不同的决策支持工具,但在尼泊尔尚未对其在玉米上进行比较研究。因此,我们评估了不同的缓释氮肥和实时氮管理决策工具,并与普通尿素进行比较,看它们在提高春玉米(L. cv. Rampur Hybrid - 10)的氮素利用效率、籽粒产量和经济回报方面的效果。在尼泊尔当谷进行了田间试验,采用随机完全区组设计,三次重复,七个处理;不施氮(0 kg N ha)、120 kg N ha的普通尿素(推荐剂量,N120)、180 kg N ha(N180)、聚合物包膜尿素(PCU - 90 kg N ha)、尿素压块深施(UDP - 90 kg N ha)、GreenSeeker(GS - 143 kg N ha)和基于叶色卡的氮管理(LCC - 143 kg N ha)。基于决策支持工具(LCC和GS)和创新型肥料(UDP、PCU)的施氮处理比推荐剂量(RDF)的籽粒产量高出17.35 - 45.81%。与RDF(12.15 kg籽粒/kg N)和N180(19.87 kg籽粒/kg N)相比,通过LCC和GreenSeeker进行实时施氮以及使用缓释氮肥(PCU和UDP),氮肥农学效率更高——AEN为(21.30 - 27.82 kg籽粒/kg N)。与RDF相比,N用量减少25%的UDP,籽粒产量更高(5.25 t/ha),氮素偏生产力——PFPN为(58.37 kg籽粒/kg N),AEN为(27.82 kg籽粒/kg N)。基于经济回报和施用便利性,在尼泊尔条件下,UDP和基于LCC的施氮处理似乎都很有前景。然而,其有效性应在不同的农业生态、土壤类型和气候条件下进行验证,以便给出一般性建议。