Xing Lingyu, Zhou Yannan, Han Yi, Chen Chen, Dong Zegang, Zheng Xinde, Chen Dongxu, Yu Yao, Liao Fengqing, Guo Shuai, Yao Chenling, Tang Min, Gu Guorong
Department of Emergency Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Suzhou Zhi Zhun Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 May 23;9:890567. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.890567. eCollection 2022.
We sought to find a bedside prognosis prediction model based on clinical and image parameters to determine the in-hospital outcomes of acute aortic dissection (AAD) in the emergency department.
Patients who presented with AAD from January 2010 to December 2019 were retrospectively recruited in our derivation cohort. Then we prospectively collected patients with AAD from January 2020 to December 2021 as the validation cohort. We collected the demographics, medical history, treatment options, and in-hospital outcomes. All enrolled patients underwent computed tomography angiography. The image data were systematically reviewed for anatomic criteria in a retrospective fashion by three professional radiologists. A series of radiological parameters, including the extent of dissection, the site of the intimal tear, entry tear diameter, aortic diameter at each level, maximum false lumen diameter, and presence of pericardial effusion were collected.
Of the 449 patients in the derivation cohort, 345 (76.8%) were male, the mean age was 61 years, and 298 (66.4%) had a history of hypertension. Surgical repair was performed in 327 (72.8%) cases in the derivation cohort, and the overall crude in-hospital mortality of AAD was 10.9%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that predictors of in-hospital mortality in AAD included age, Marfan syndrome, type A aortic dissection, surgical repair, and maximum false lumen diameter. A final prognostic model incorporating these five predictors showed good calibration and discrimination in the derivation and validation cohorts. As for type A aortic dissection, 3-level type A aortic dissection clinical prognosis score (3ADPS) including 5 clinical and image variables scored from -2 to 5 was established: (1) moderate risk of death if 3ADPS is <0; (2) high risk of death if 3ADPS is 1-2; (3) very high risk of death if 3ADPS is more than 3. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curves in the validation cohorts was 0.833 (95% CI, 0.700-0.967).
Age, Marfan syndrome, type A aortic dissection, surgical repair, and maximum false lumen diameter can significantly affect the in-hospital outcomes of AAD. And 3ADPS contributes to the prediction of in-hospital prognosis of type A aortic dissection rapidly and effectively. As multivariable risk prediction tools, the risk models were readily available for emergency doctors to predict in-hospital mortality of patients with AAD in extreme clinical risk.
我们试图基于临床和影像参数找到一种床旁预后预测模型,以确定急诊科急性主动脉夹层(AAD)患者的院内结局。
回顾性纳入2010年1月至2019年12月期间出现AAD的患者作为我们的推导队列。然后前瞻性收集2020年1月至2021年12月期间的AAD患者作为验证队列。我们收集了人口统计学、病史、治疗选择和院内结局。所有入组患者均接受了计算机断层扫描血管造影。三位专业放射科医生以回顾性方式系统地审查影像数据以确定解剖学标准。收集了一系列放射学参数,包括夹层范围、内膜撕裂部位、入口撕裂直径、各层面主动脉直径、最大假腔直径和心包积液情况。
推导队列中的449例患者中,345例(76.8%)为男性,平均年龄为61岁,298例(66.4%)有高血压病史。推导队列中有327例(72.8%)进行了手术修复,AAD的总体粗院内死亡率为10.9%。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,AAD院内死亡的预测因素包括年龄、马凡综合征、A型主动脉夹层、手术修复和最大假腔直径。纳入这五个预测因素的最终预后模型在推导队列和验证队列中显示出良好的校准和区分度。对于A型主动脉夹层,建立了包括5个临床和影像变量、评分范围为-2至5的3级A型主动脉夹层临床预后评分(3ADPS):(1)3ADPS<0为中度死亡风险;(2)3ADPS为1-2为高死亡风险;(3)3ADPS>3为极高死亡风险。验证队列中受试者操作特征曲线下面积为0.833(95%CI,0.700-0.967)。
年龄、马凡综合征、A型主动脉夹层、手术修复和最大假腔直径可显著影响AAD的院内结局。3ADPS有助于快速有效地预测A型主动脉夹层的院内预后。作为多变量风险预测工具,这些风险模型可供急诊医生在极端临床风险情况下预测AAD患者的院内死亡率。