Suppr超能文献

[医疗保健的数字化转型:德国卫生服务研究网络(DNVF)数字健康工作组以及二次数据验证与关联的德尔菲研究]

[Digital Transformation of Healthcare: A Delphi Study of the Working Groups Digital Health and Validation and Linkage of Secondary Data of the German Network for Health Services Research (DNVF)].

作者信息

Vollmar Horst Christian, Lemmen Clarissa, Kramer Ursula, Richter Jutta G, Fiebig Madlen, Hoffmann Falk, Redaèlli Marcus

机构信息

Abteilung für Allgemeinmedizin (AM RUB), Ruhr-Universitat Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

Institut für Gesundheitsökonomie und Klinische Epidemiologie (IGKE) , Universität zu Köln Medizinische Fakultät, Koln, Germany.

出版信息

Gesundheitswesen. 2022 Jul;84(7):581-596. doi: 10.1055/a-1821-8429. Epub 2022 Jun 9.

Abstract

AIM OF THE STUDY

The digital transformation in healthcare is also of fundamental importance for healthcare research. For this reason, experts should agree on, prioritize and identify key topics for a medium-term strategy of the German Network for Health Services Research and classify the general development of digital health in the context of health services research.

METHODS

Between April and September 2018, the working groups "Digital Health" and "Validation and Linkage of Secondary Data" of the German Network for Health Services Research were asked to submit their expertise online using the methodological approach of a Delphi study. For this purpose, a multi-stage modified Delphi method with quantitative and qualitative approaches was chosen. Initially, a list of theses was drawn from the network's published position papers on digital health applications and medical apps. A total of 131 statements were formulated. The final survey instrument included questions on the biographical background of the participants, 42 developed items (33 statements and 8 open-ended questions), and one free-text field to add further aspects. Items were evaluated with a five-point Likert scale. A statement was accepted if the agreement rate was 75% or higher.

RESULTS

Of the 110 potential participants, 50 (46%) took part in the first round and 39 (36%) in the second round of the Delphi survey. In the first round, there was a clear result for 24 of 33 statements. There were 20 statements "agreed with" and four "disagreed with." Nine statements were between 60 and 75% and were presented to the participants again for evaluation in the second round. In round two, of these nine statements, four statements were "agreed with" and five statements were "disagreed with." Digital Health Literacy" emerged as a particular focus in this Delphi study.

CONCLUSION

In this Delphi study, experts were involved in selecting and prioritizing possible topics for the Digital Health working group and assessing future developments in digital health in the context of health services research. The results reflect both the expectations and interests of the members and are largely consistent with the recommendations of the report "Digitalization for Health" made by the expert council for assessing developments in the health sector.

摘要

研究目的

医疗保健领域的数字化转型对医疗保健研究也至关重要。因此,专家们应就德国卫生服务研究网络中期战略的关键主题达成共识、确定优先次序并加以识别,并在卫生服务研究的背景下对数字健康的总体发展进行分类。

方法

2018年4月至9月期间,德国卫生服务研究网络的“数字健康”和“二次数据的验证与关联”工作组被要求采用德尔菲研究的方法在线提交其专业知识。为此,选择了一种采用定量和定性方法的多阶段改进德尔菲法。最初,从该网络发表的关于数字健康应用和医疗应用程序的立场文件中提取了一系列论题。共制定了131条陈述。最终的调查问卷包括关于参与者传记背景的问题、42个拟定项目(33条陈述和8个开放式问题)以及一个用于补充其他方面的自由文本字段。项目采用五点李克特量表进行评估。如果同意率达到75%或更高,则该陈述被接受。

结果

在110名潜在参与者中,50名(46%)参加了第一轮德尔菲调查,39名(36%)参加了第二轮。在第一轮中,33条陈述中有24条有明确结果。其中20条陈述“同意”,4条“不同意”。9条陈述的同意率在60%至75%之间,在第二轮中再次提交给参与者进行评估。在第二轮中,这9条陈述中有4条“同意”,5条“不同意”。“数字健康素养”成为本次德尔菲研究的一个特别重点。

结论

在本次德尔菲研究中,专家们参与了为数字健康工作组选择可能的主题并确定其优先次序,并在卫生服务研究的背景下评估数字健康的未来发展。结果既反映了成员们的期望和兴趣,也在很大程度上与评估卫生部门发展的专家委员会所做的《健康数字化》报告中的建议一致。

相似文献

2
360-degree Delphi: addressing sociotechnical challenges of healthcare IT.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1071-x.
3
Digital adaptability competency for healthcare professionals: a modified explorative e-Delphi study.
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Feb;67:103563. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103563. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
5
Consensus protocol for management of early and late twin-twin transfusion syndrome: Delphi study.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Mar;63(3):371-377. doi: 10.1002/uog.27446. Epub 2024 Feb 3.
7
Speech and language therapy best practice for patients in prolonged disorders of consciousness: a modified Delphi study.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019 Sep;54(5):841-854. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12489. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
8
[Advancement of an intermediate level of outpatient palliative care - A Delphi study].
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2023 Jun;179:29-38. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2023.03.003. Epub 2023 May 10.
9
A T2 Translational Science Modified Delphi Study: Spinal Motion Restriction in a Resource-Scarce Environment.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2020 Oct;35(5):538-545. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X20000862. Epub 2020 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

2
[Digital Healthcare: Requirements for a Successful Transformation].
Gesundheitswesen. 2024 Aug;86(8-09):549-552. doi: 10.1055/a-2184-5572. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
3
[Digital transformation of German healthcare organizations : Current status and existing challenges from the perspective of quality management].
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2023 Sep;66(9):972-981. doi: 10.1007/s00103-023-03743-y. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
4
[Acceptance of Teledermatology: Results of a Survey of General Practitioners and Dermatologists in Saxony (Germany)].
Gesundheitswesen. 2023 Dec;85(12):1149-1156. doi: 10.1055/a-1999-7523. Epub 2023 Jan 31.

本文引用的文献

3
[DNVF-Memorandum - Health and Medical Apps].
Gesundheitswesen. 2019 Oct;81(10):850-854. doi: 10.1055/a-1038-9173. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
4
[DNVF-Memorandum - Health and Medical Apps].
Gesundheitswesen. 2019 Oct;81(10):e154-e170. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1667451. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
7
Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;67(4):401-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.002.
8
Consulting the oracle: ten lessons from using the Delphi technique in nursing research.
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Jan;53(2):205-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03716.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验