Vollmar Horst Christian, Lemmen Clarissa, Kramer Ursula, Richter Jutta G, Fiebig Madlen, Hoffmann Falk, Redaèlli Marcus
Abteilung für Allgemeinmedizin (AM RUB), Ruhr-Universitat Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Institut für Gesundheitsökonomie und Klinische Epidemiologie (IGKE) , Universität zu Köln Medizinische Fakultät, Koln, Germany.
Gesundheitswesen. 2022 Jul;84(7):581-596. doi: 10.1055/a-1821-8429. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
The digital transformation in healthcare is also of fundamental importance for healthcare research. For this reason, experts should agree on, prioritize and identify key topics for a medium-term strategy of the German Network for Health Services Research and classify the general development of digital health in the context of health services research.
Between April and September 2018, the working groups "Digital Health" and "Validation and Linkage of Secondary Data" of the German Network for Health Services Research were asked to submit their expertise online using the methodological approach of a Delphi study. For this purpose, a multi-stage modified Delphi method with quantitative and qualitative approaches was chosen. Initially, a list of theses was drawn from the network's published position papers on digital health applications and medical apps. A total of 131 statements were formulated. The final survey instrument included questions on the biographical background of the participants, 42 developed items (33 statements and 8 open-ended questions), and one free-text field to add further aspects. Items were evaluated with a five-point Likert scale. A statement was accepted if the agreement rate was 75% or higher.
Of the 110 potential participants, 50 (46%) took part in the first round and 39 (36%) in the second round of the Delphi survey. In the first round, there was a clear result for 24 of 33 statements. There were 20 statements "agreed with" and four "disagreed with." Nine statements were between 60 and 75% and were presented to the participants again for evaluation in the second round. In round two, of these nine statements, four statements were "agreed with" and five statements were "disagreed with." Digital Health Literacy" emerged as a particular focus in this Delphi study.
In this Delphi study, experts were involved in selecting and prioritizing possible topics for the Digital Health working group and assessing future developments in digital health in the context of health services research. The results reflect both the expectations and interests of the members and are largely consistent with the recommendations of the report "Digitalization for Health" made by the expert council for assessing developments in the health sector.
医疗保健领域的数字化转型对医疗保健研究也至关重要。因此,专家们应就德国卫生服务研究网络中期战略的关键主题达成共识、确定优先次序并加以识别,并在卫生服务研究的背景下对数字健康的总体发展进行分类。
2018年4月至9月期间,德国卫生服务研究网络的“数字健康”和“二次数据的验证与关联”工作组被要求采用德尔菲研究的方法在线提交其专业知识。为此,选择了一种采用定量和定性方法的多阶段改进德尔菲法。最初,从该网络发表的关于数字健康应用和医疗应用程序的立场文件中提取了一系列论题。共制定了131条陈述。最终的调查问卷包括关于参与者传记背景的问题、42个拟定项目(33条陈述和8个开放式问题)以及一个用于补充其他方面的自由文本字段。项目采用五点李克特量表进行评估。如果同意率达到75%或更高,则该陈述被接受。
在110名潜在参与者中,50名(46%)参加了第一轮德尔菲调查,39名(36%)参加了第二轮。在第一轮中,33条陈述中有24条有明确结果。其中20条陈述“同意”,4条“不同意”。9条陈述的同意率在60%至75%之间,在第二轮中再次提交给参与者进行评估。在第二轮中,这9条陈述中有4条“同意”,5条“不同意”。“数字健康素养”成为本次德尔菲研究的一个特别重点。
在本次德尔菲研究中,专家们参与了为数字健康工作组选择可能的主题并确定其优先次序,并在卫生服务研究的背景下评估数字健康的未来发展。结果既反映了成员们的期望和兴趣,也在很大程度上与评估卫生部门发展的专家委员会所做的《健康数字化》报告中的建议一致。