Davis Esther F, Crousillat Daniela R, He Wei, Andrews Carl T, Hung Judy W, Danik Jacqueline S
Echocardiography Section, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Victorian Heart Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Echocardiography Section, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, Department of Medicine, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Jun;15(6):989-997. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.02.006. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
Left atrial volume (LAV) is often adjusted for body surface area (BSA). In overweight individuals this may result in underestimation of left atrial (LA) dilation. The authors investigated whether alternative indexing techniques better predict mortality and cardiovascular (CV) events.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of different methods of indexing LAV in predicting mortality and CV events across a range of body sizes.
LAV was adjusted for BSA, idealized BSA (iBSA), height, and height-squared (H) in patients aged over 50 years who underwent outpatient echocardiography and longitudinal follow-up at our institution. LA dilation was categorized using published criteria. Mortality and CV events were assessed via medical records.
LAVs were calculated in 17,454 individuals. In this study, 71.2% were overweight or obese. Indexing using iBSA, height, and H resulted in reclassification of LA size in up to 28.4% (P < 0.001) compared with indexing using BSA. In severely obese individuals (body mass index [BMI] ≥40 kg/m), LA dilation indexed for BSA no longer predicted mortality (P = 0.70). Other indexing methods remained predictive of mortality. Height, H, and iBSA all had greater performance, compared with BSA, for prediction of mortality and CV events in all overweight patients with H showing the best overall performance (P < 0.001). Net reclassification index for mortality was significant for all alternative indexing techniques (P < 0.001) and patients whose LA was reclassified from normal to dilated had increased risk of mortality (P < 0.001) and CV events (P < 0.001) across all BMI categories.
LA dilation based on standard indexing using BSA is nondiscriminatory for prediction of mortality in the severely obese. Indexing using height, H, or iBSA to diagnose LA dilation better predicts mortality in this population and has better overall predictive performance across all overweight and obese populations. Using BSA indexing may lead to underappreciation of LA dilation and underestimation of patients at increased risk.
左心房容积(LAV)通常会根据体表面积(BSA)进行调整。在超重个体中,这可能导致对左心房(LA)扩张的低估。作者研究了其他索引技术是否能更好地预测死亡率和心血管(CV)事件。
本研究的目的是评估不同的LAV索引方法在预测不同体型患者的死亡率和CV事件方面的有效性。
在我们机构接受门诊超声心动图检查和纵向随访的50岁以上患者中,将LAV根据BSA、理想体表面积(iBSA)、身高和身高平方(H)进行调整。使用已发表的标准对LA扩张进行分类。通过病历评估死亡率和CV事件。
对17454名个体计算了LAV。在本研究中,71.2%为超重或肥胖。与使用BSA进行索引相比,使用iBSA、身高和H进行索引导致高达28.4%的LA大小重新分类(P < 0.001)。在严重肥胖个体(体重指数[BMI]≥40 kg/m²)中,基于BSA索引的LA扩张不再能预测死亡率(P = 0.70)。其他索引方法仍然可以预测死亡率。与BSA相比,身高、H和iBSA在预测所有超重患者的死亡率和CV事件方面表现更佳,其中H的总体表现最佳(P < 0.001)。所有替代索引技术的死亡率净重新分类指数均具有显著性(P < 0.001),并且在所有BMI类别中,LA从正常重新分类为扩张的患者死亡率(P < 0.001)和CV事件风险(P < 0.001)均增加。
基于使用BSA的标准索引来诊断LA扩张,对于预测严重肥胖患者的死亡率没有区分能力。使用身高、H或iBSA进行索引来诊断LA扩张,能更好地预测该人群的死亡率,并且在所有超重和肥胖人群中具有更好的总体预测性能。使用BSA索引可能会导致对LA扩张的认识不足以及对风险增加患者的低估。