Disability and Health Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Discipline of Exercise Science, Health Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 9;12(6):e055796. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055796.
Comorbid depression is prevalent in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Depression is commonly untreated or undertreated, thus, there is a need for effective and safe interventions and current guidelines recommend psychological and pharmaceutical interventions for people with MS. However, research suggests that other interventions, such as exercise, could also be effective. The comparative efficacy and safety of intervention modalities have not been quantified.We plan to conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare efficacy and safety of psychological, pharmaceutical, physical and magnetic stimulation interventions for depression in people with MS.
We will search EMBASE, Medline, Cochrane CENTRAL, APA PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL and PEDro from inception to 31 December 2021. Search terms will stem from three concepts: MS, depression and randomised controlled trials. Included studies will be randomised controlled trials, where participants are people with MS randomised to receive one of the aforementioned intervention types, and depression or depressive symptoms is the primary outcome, only outcome or secondary outcome with an a priori power calculation. Screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment (using the Risk of Bias 2 tool) will be conducted independently by two reviewers. If possible, we will synthesise the evidence by fitting a frequentist network meta-analysis model with multivariate random effects, or a pairwise random-effects meta-analysis model. For each model, efficacy will be measured using a standardised mean difference, and safety using an OR. We plan to provide summary measures including forest plots, a geometry of the network, surface under the cumulative ranking curve, and a league table, and perform subgroup analyses. Otherwise, a narrative review will be provided.
Ethics is not required for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Results will be published in a peer reviewed journal.
CRD42020209803.
多发性硬化症(MS)患者常并发抑郁。抑郁常未得到治疗或治疗不足,因此,需要有效的安全干预措施,当前指南建议对 MS 患者进行心理和药物干预。然而,研究表明,其他干预措施,如运动,也可能有效。干预方式的疗效和安全性比较尚未量化。我们计划进行系统评价和网络荟萃分析,以比较心理、药物、物理和磁刺激干预对 MS 患者抑郁的疗效和安全性。
我们将从建库至 2021 年 12 月 31 日,检索 EMBASE、Medline、Cochrane 中心数据库、APA PsycINFO、Web of Science、CINAHL 和 PEDro。检索词将源自三个概念:MS、抑郁和随机对照试验。纳入研究为随机对照试验,其中参与者为被随机分配至接受上述干预类型之一的 MS 患者,抑郁或抑郁症状为主要结局,仅为结局或次要结局,并进行了预先设定的功效计算。筛选、数据提取和偏倚风险评估(使用风险偏倚 2 工具)将由两名评审员独立进行。如果可能,我们将通过拟合具有多变量随机效应的频率网络荟萃分析模型,或具有成对随机效应荟萃分析模型,对证据进行综合。对于每个模型,将使用标准化均数差来衡量疗效,使用比值比来衡量安全性。我们计划提供汇总措施,包括森林图、网络图的几何形状、累积排序曲线下的面积和联赛表,并进行亚组分析。否则,将提供叙述性综述。
系统评价和网络荟萃分析不需要伦理。研究结果将发表在同行评审的期刊上。
PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42020209803。