Suppr超能文献

分配正义偏好的世界:个人和国家层面支持平等、公平和需求的概况。

Worlds of distributive justice preferences: Individual- and country-level profiles of support for equality, equity and need.

作者信息

Van Hootegem Arno

机构信息

Centre for Sociological Research, KU Leuven, Parkstraat 45 - Box 3601, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Soc Sci Res. 2022 Aug;106:102721. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102721. Epub 2022 Mar 7.

Abstract

Based on welfare regime theory, scholars have tried to understand cross-national differences in solidarity by constructing 'worlds of welfare attitudes'. Most studies use a variable-centred logic to examine quantitative differences in support for the delivery of welfare provisions. Yet, the worlds of attitudes approach implies that qualitatively distinct logics of social justice exist. Thus, an alternative person-centred approach is needed that uncovers clusters of beliefs about the preferred type of welfare system. This article assesses individual- and country-level profiles of preferences for the principles of equality, equity and need to dissect worlds of distributive justice preferences. Multilevel latent profile analysis is applied to European Social Survey data (2018/2019). Results reveal four individual profiles that each combine distinct preferences for equality, equity and need. On the basis of the distribution of these individual profiles, three country profiles or worlds of distributive justice preferences are identified, which are not institutionally structured.

摘要

基于福利体制理论,学者们试图通过构建“福利态度世界”来理解团结方面的跨国差异。大多数研究采用以变量为中心的逻辑来考察在支持福利供给方面的数量差异。然而,态度世界方法意味着存在质上不同的社会正义逻辑。因此,需要一种替代性的以个人为中心的方法,以揭示关于首选福利制度类型的信念集群。本文评估了对平等、公平和需求原则的偏好的个人层面和国家层面概况,以剖析分配正义偏好的世界。多层次潜在概况分析应用于欧洲社会调查数据(2018/2019)。结果揭示了四种个人概况,每种概况都结合了对平等、公平和需求的不同偏好。根据这些个人概况的分布,确定了三种国家概况或分配正义偏好的世界,它们并非由制度构建而成。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验