Van Hootegem Arno
Centre for Sociological Research, KU Leuven, Parkstraat 45 - Box 3601, Leuven, Belgium.
Soc Sci Res. 2022 Aug;106:102721. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102721. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
Based on welfare regime theory, scholars have tried to understand cross-national differences in solidarity by constructing 'worlds of welfare attitudes'. Most studies use a variable-centred logic to examine quantitative differences in support for the delivery of welfare provisions. Yet, the worlds of attitudes approach implies that qualitatively distinct logics of social justice exist. Thus, an alternative person-centred approach is needed that uncovers clusters of beliefs about the preferred type of welfare system. This article assesses individual- and country-level profiles of preferences for the principles of equality, equity and need to dissect worlds of distributive justice preferences. Multilevel latent profile analysis is applied to European Social Survey data (2018/2019). Results reveal four individual profiles that each combine distinct preferences for equality, equity and need. On the basis of the distribution of these individual profiles, three country profiles or worlds of distributive justice preferences are identified, which are not institutionally structured.
基于福利体制理论,学者们试图通过构建“福利态度世界”来理解团结方面的跨国差异。大多数研究采用以变量为中心的逻辑来考察在支持福利供给方面的数量差异。然而,态度世界方法意味着存在质上不同的社会正义逻辑。因此,需要一种替代性的以个人为中心的方法,以揭示关于首选福利制度类型的信念集群。本文评估了对平等、公平和需求原则的偏好的个人层面和国家层面概况,以剖析分配正义偏好的世界。多层次潜在概况分析应用于欧洲社会调查数据(2018/2019)。结果揭示了四种个人概况,每种概况都结合了对平等、公平和需求的不同偏好。根据这些个人概况的分布,确定了三种国家概况或分配正义偏好的世界,它们并非由制度构建而成。