• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Discordant recommendations: when strong recommendations are based on low certainty evidence.

作者信息

Christensen Rachel E, Anvery Noor, Dirr McKenzie A, Alam Murad

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N St Clair St, Ste 1600, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.

Department of Otolaryngology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N St Clair St, Ste 1600, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.

出版信息

Arch Dermatol Res. 2023 Mar;315(2):279-281. doi: 10.1007/s00403-022-02359-7. Epub 2022 Jun 9.

DOI:10.1007/s00403-022-02359-7
PMID:35680659
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Discordant recommendations: when strong recommendations are based on low certainty evidence.不一致的推荐意见：当强烈推荐基于低确定性证据时。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2023 Mar;315(2):279-281. doi: 10.1007/s00403-022-02359-7. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
2
UpToDate adherence to GRADE criteria for strong recommendations: an analytical survey.《UpToDate》对强烈推荐的GRADE标准的遵循情况：一项分析性调查。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 16;7(11):e018593. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018593.
3
A number of factors explain why WHO guideline developers make strong recommendations inconsistent with GRADE guidance.有许多因素可以解释为什么世卫组织指南制定者提出的强烈建议与 GRADE 指南不一致。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Feb;70:111-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.09.006. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
4
World Health Organization strong recommendations based on low-quality evidence (study quality) are frequent and often inconsistent with GRADE guidance.世界卫生组织基于低质量证据（研究质量）给出的强烈建议屡见不鲜，且常常与GRADE指南不一致。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;72:98-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.10.011. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
5
Senior GRADE methodologists encounter challenges as part of WHO guideline development panels: an inductive content analysis.资深 GRADE 方法学家在 WHO 指南制定小组中遇到挑战：归纳内容分析。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Feb;70:123-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.09.003. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
6
Suboptimal care for chronic pancreatitis patients revealed by moderate to low adherence to the United European Gastroenterology evidence-based guidelines (HaPanEU): A Netherlands nationwide analysis.中低程度遵循欧洲胃肠病学联合会循证指南对慢性胰腺炎患者的治疗不足：荷兰全国性分析。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2020 Aug;8(7):764-774. doi: 10.1177/2050640620937610. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
7
An Evaluation of Guideline-Discordant Ordering Behavior for CT Pulmonary Angiography in the Emergency Department.急诊科 CT 肺动脉造影指南不一致医嘱行为评估。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Aug;16(8):1064-1072. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.12.015. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
8
[Evidence based medicine and the "real life": why do physicians not apply guideline recommendations in the daily clinical practice?].[循证医学与“现实生活”：为何医生在日常临床实践中不应用指南推荐？]
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2010 Dec;29(12):859-61. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2010.11.015.
9
Guideline Recommendations: Optimal Timing of Publication and Resulting Rate of Adoption.指南建议：最佳发表时机及采纳率
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 1;72(11):1950-1951. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa485.
10
Defining certainty of net benefit: a GRADE concept paper.定义净效益的确切性：GRADE 概念文件。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 4;9(6):e027445. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027445.

本文引用的文献

1
Discordant and inappropriate discordant recommendations in consensus and evidence based guidelines: empirical analysis.共识和循证指南中的不一致和不恰当的不一致建议：实证分析。
BMJ. 2021 Nov 25;375:e066045. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-066045.
2
UpToDate adherence to GRADE criteria for strong recommendations: an analytical survey.《UpToDate》对强烈推荐的GRADE标准的遵循情况：一项分析性调查。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 16;7(11):e018593. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018593.
3
The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence.
GRADE工作组对证据确定性的概念进行了澄清。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Jul;87:4-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 May 18.
4
GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength.GRADE 指南：15. 从证据到推荐——推荐方向和强度的决定因素。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Jul;66(7):726-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
5
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.证据质量分级与推荐强度
BMJ. 2004 Jun 19;328(7454):1490. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490.