Experimental Psychology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2022 Dec;56(4):902-909. doi: 10.1007/s12124-022-09705-4. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
The analysis of Danish psychology students' Master's thesis projects, focusing on their methodological approaches showed a discrepancy of their interest and the predominance of mainstream quantitative approach published in psychology journals. The interest of Danish psychology students in qualitative methodologies indicate that there is a social normativity guiding the choice of research methods (Szulevicz et al., 2021) This paper focus on the academic rites and myths that usually homogenize the reflections and actions of the weird people who attends the university. It is argued that from the rites and myths that shapes the academic environment, the researcher develops an affective availability to select aspects of the experience to reflect on. The preparation of the project depends on the methodological choices and adjustments, making the reflected experience intelligible to the academic audience, invited to criticize the ongoing work and when it is finished. Categories addressing the qualities of psychological experience are proposed opening paths for possible future researches on the topic.
丹麦心理学专业硕士论文项目分析，重点关注他们的方法论方法，表明他们的兴趣与主流定量方法的差异，这些方法在心理学期刊上发表。丹麦心理学专业学生对定性方法的兴趣表明，有一种社会规范性指导着研究方法的选择（Szulevicz 等人，2021 年）。本文重点关注学术仪式和神话，这些仪式和神话通常使参加大学的奇怪人的反思和行动同质化。有人认为，从塑造学术环境的仪式和神话中，研究人员发展出一种情感上的可用性，以便选择经验的各个方面进行反思。项目的准备取决于方法论的选择和调整，使所反映的经验能够被邀请批评正在进行的工作并在完成后对学术受众理解。提出了一些涉及心理体验质量的类别，为该主题的未来研究开辟了道路。
