• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心肌梗死相关的心源性休克何时实现完全血运重建。

When to Achieve Complete Revascularization in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock.

作者信息

Masiero Giulia, Cardaioli Francesco, Rodinò Giulio, Tarantini Giuseppe

机构信息

Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua Medical School, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padova, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 May 31;11(11):3116. doi: 10.3390/jcm11113116.

DOI:10.3390/jcm11113116
PMID:35683500
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9180947/
Abstract

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) is a life-threatening condition frequently encountered in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). Despite prompt revascularization, in particular, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and therapeutic and technological advances, the mortality rate for patients with CS related to AMI remains unacceptably high. Differently form a hemodynamically stable setting, a culprit lesion-only (CLO) revascularization strategy is currently suggested for AMI-CS patients, based on the results of recent randomized evidence burdened by several limitations and conflicting results from non-randomized studies. Furthermore, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices have emerged as a key therapeutic option in CS, especially in the case of their early implantation without delaying revascularization and before irreversible organ damage has occurred. We provide an in-depth review of the current evidence on optimal revascularization strategies of multivessel CAD in infarct-related CS, assessing the role of different types of MCS devices and highlighting the importance of shock teams and medical care system networks to effectively impact on clinical outcomes.

摘要

急性心肌梗死(AMI)合并心源性休克(CS)是多支冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者中经常遇到的危及生命的情况。尽管进行了及时的血运重建,特别是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI),以及治疗和技术的进步,但与AMI相关的CS患者的死亡率仍然高得令人难以接受。与血流动力学稳定的情况不同,基于近期随机试验结果(该结果受到一些局限性的影响且非随机研究结果相互矛盾),目前建议对AMI-CS患者采用仅处理罪犯病变(CLO)的血运重建策略。此外,机械循环支持(MCS)设备已成为CS的关键治疗选择,特别是在早期植入且不延迟血运重建以及在不可逆器官损伤发生之前的情况下。我们对梗死相关CS中多支CAD的最佳血运重建策略的当前证据进行了深入综述,评估了不同类型MCS设备的作用,并强调了休克治疗团队和医疗护理系统网络对有效影响临床结局的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8155/9180947/855a1b5309c5/jcm-11-03116-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8155/9180947/855a1b5309c5/jcm-11-03116-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8155/9180947/855a1b5309c5/jcm-11-03116-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
When to Achieve Complete Revascularization in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock.心肌梗死相关的心源性休克何时实现完全血运重建。
J Clin Med. 2022 May 31;11(11):3116. doi: 10.3390/jcm11113116.
2
Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock: a critical appraisal.机械循环支持在心原性休克中的应用:批判性评价。
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2022 Jun;20(6):443-454. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2022.2078702. Epub 2022 May 22.
3
Current clinical management of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克的临床处理现状。
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2021 Jan;19(1):41-46. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2021.1854733. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
4
Coronary revascularization and circulatory support strategies in patients with myocardial infarction, multi-vessel coronary artery disease, and cardiogenic shock: Insights from an international survey.心肌梗死、多支冠状动脉疾病和心源性休克患者的冠状动脉血运重建和循环支持策略:国际调查的见解。
Am Heart J. 2020 Jul;225:55-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.04.011. Epub 2020 May 3.
5
Sex-Specific Management in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock: A Substudy of the CULPRIT-SHOCK Trial.急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克患者的性别特异性管理:CULPRIT-SHOCK 试验的亚研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Mar;13(3):e008537. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008537. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
6
Meta-Analysis of the Optimal Percutaneous Revascularization Strategy in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction, Cardiogenic Shock, and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease.急性心肌梗死、心源性休克和多支冠状动脉疾病患者最佳经皮血管重建策略的荟萃分析
Am J Cardiol. 2017 May 15;119(10):1525-1531. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.02.028. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
7
Therapeutic Advances in the Management of Cardiogenic Shock.心源性休克治疗的进展。
Am J Ther. 2019 Mar/Apr;26(2):e234-e247. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000920.
8
Multivessel Versus Culprit-Vessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Cardiogenic Shock.多血管病变与罪犯血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗心原性休克。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 May 25;13(10):1171-1178. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.03.012. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
9
Multivessel versus culprit lesion only percutaneous revascularization plus potential staged revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: Design and rationale of CULPRIT-SHOCK trial.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者多支血管与仅罪犯病变经皮血管重建加潜在分期血管重建:CULPRIT-SHOCK试验的设计与原理
Am Heart J. 2016 Feb;172:160-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
10
Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.血管内微型轴流左心室辅助装置与主动脉内球囊泵在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者中的应用与院内死亡率和大出血的关系。
JAMA. 2020 Feb 25;323(8):734-745. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0254.

引用本文的文献

1
Complete or incomplete revascularization in patients with left main culprit lesion acute myocardial infarction with multivessel disease: a retrospective observational study.多支血管病变的左主干罪犯病变急性心肌梗死患者的完全或不完全血运重建:一项回顾性观察研究
J Yeungnam Med Sci. 2025;42:18. doi: 10.12701/jyms.2025.42.18. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
2
Review of Advancements in Managing Cardiogenic Shock: From Emergency Care Protocols to Long-Term Therapeutic Strategies.心源性休克管理进展综述:从急救方案到长期治疗策略
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 16;13(16):4841. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164841.
3
Differential Prognostic Impact of IABP-SHOCK II Scores According to Treatment Strategy in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Coronary Syndrome: From the RESCUE Registry.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of Impella percutaneous left ventricular assist device in the management of cardiogenic shock: A matter of where and when.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jan 1;99(1):48-49. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30040.
2
Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock Interventional Approach to Management in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories.急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克的介入治疗在导管室的管理
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2022;18(2):e251121198293. doi: 10.2174/1573403X17666211125090929.
3
Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Review.急性心肌梗死后心原性休克:综述。
根据治疗策略,IABP-SHOCK II评分对急性冠状动脉综合征并发心源性休克的预后影响差异:来自RESCUE注册研究
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jan 20;60(1):183. doi: 10.3390/medicina60010183.
4
Mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity score-matched studies.心源性休克的机械循环支持:随机对照试验和倾向评分匹配研究的网状Meta分析
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Feb;50(2):209-221. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07278-3. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
5
Influence on emergency digit replantation and outcome assessment after COVID-19 virus nucleic acid testing normalization.新型冠状病毒核酸检测常态化后对急诊断指再植及疗效评估的影响
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1078933. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1078933. eCollection 2022.
6
Interventional Cardiology: Current Challenges in Acute Myocardial Infarction.介入心脏病学:急性心肌梗死的当前挑战
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 2;11(15):4504. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154504.
JAMA. 2021 Nov 9;326(18):1840-1850. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.18323.
4
Management and Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock in Cardiac ICUs With Versus Without Shock Teams.心外 ICU 中是否设置休克团队对心源性休克的管理和预后的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Sep 28;78(13):1309-1317. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.07.044.
5
2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure.2021年欧洲心脏病学会急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗指南。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 21;42(36):3599-3726. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368.
6
Management of cardiogenic shock.心源性休克的治疗。
EuroIntervention. 2021 Aug 27;17(6):451-465. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01296.
7
Complete Revascularisation in Impella-Supported Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock Patients Is Associated With Improved Mortality.在Impella支持的梗死相关心源性休克患者中实现完全血运重建与死亡率改善相关。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Jul 9;8:678748. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.678748. eCollection 2021.
8
Completeness of revascularisation in acute coronary syndrome patients with multivessel disease.多支血管病变急性冠脉综合征患者的血运重建完整性。
EuroIntervention. 2021 Jun 25;17(3):193-201. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00957.
9
Outcomes of mechanical circulatory support for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.机械循环支持治疗急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克的疗效。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;99(3):658-663. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29834. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
10
Joint EAPCI/ACVC expert consensus document on percutaneous ventricular assist devices.经皮心室辅助装置的 EAPCI/ACVC 专家共识文件
EuroIntervention. 2021 Jul 20;17(4):e274-e286. doi: 10.4244/EIJY21M05_01.