Schäfer Andreas, Westenfeld Ralf, Sieweke Jan-Thorben, Zietzer Andreas, Wiora Julian, Masiero Giulia, Sanchez Martinez Carolina, Tarantini Giuseppe, Werner Nikos
Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Cardiac Arrest Center, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Division of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, Cardiac Arrest Center, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Jul 9;8:678748. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.678748. eCollection 2021.
Acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) still has high likelihood of in-hospital mortality. The only trial evidence currently available for the intra-aortic balloon pump showed no benefit of its routine use in AMI-CS. While a potential benefit of complete revascularisation has been suggested in urgent revascularisation, the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial demonstrated no benefit of multivessel compared to culprit-lesion only revascularisation in AMI-CS. However, mechanical circulatory support was only used in a minority of patients. We hypothesised that more complete revascularisation facilitated by Impella support is related to lower mortality in AMI-CS patients. We analysed data from 202 consecutive Impella-treated AMI-CS patients at four European high-volume shock centres (age 66 ± 11 years, 83% male). Forty-seven percentage ( = 94) had cardiac arrest before Impella implantation. Revascularisation was categorised as incomplete if residual SYNTAX-score (rS) was >8. Overall 30-day mortality was 47%. Mortality was higher when Impella was implanted post-PCI (Impella-post-PCI: 57%, Impella-pre-PCI: 38%, = 0.0053) and if revascularisation was incomplete (rS ≤ 8: 37%, rS > 8: 56%, = 0.0099). Patients with both pre-PCI Impella implantation and complete revascularisation had significantly lower mortality (33%) than those with incomplete revascularisation and implantation post PCI (72%, < 0.001). Our retrospective analysis suggests that complete revascularisation supported by an Impella microaxial pump implanted prior to PCI is associated with lower mortality than incomplete revascularisation in patients with AMI-CS.
急性心肌梗死相关的心源性休克(AMI-CS)的院内死亡风险仍然很高。目前关于主动脉内球囊泵的唯一试验证据表明,其在AMI-CS中常规使用并无益处。虽然在紧急血运重建中已表明完全血运重建可能有益,但CULPRIT-SHOCK试验表明,在AMI-CS中,与仅对罪犯病变进行血运重建相比,多支血管血运重建并无益处。然而,仅少数患者使用了机械循环支持。我们假设,在Impella支持下实现更完全的血运重建与AMI-CS患者较低的死亡率相关。我们分析了来自四个欧洲大容量休克中心的202例接受Impella治疗的AMI-CS患者的数据(年龄66±11岁,83%为男性)。47%(n = 94)的患者在植入Impella之前发生了心脏骤停。如果残余SYNTAX评分(rS)>8,则血运重建被归类为不完全。总体30天死亡率为47%。当Impella在PCI术后植入时死亡率更高(Impella术后PCI:57%,Impella术前PCI:38%,P = 0.0053),且如果血运重建不完全(rS≤8:第37页,rS>8:56%,P = 0.0099)。PCI术前植入Impella且实现完全血运重建的患者的死亡率(33%)显著低于血运重建不完全且在PCI术后植入的患者(72%,P<0.001)。我们的回顾性分析表明,在AMI-CS患者中,PCI术前植入Impella微轴泵支持下的完全血运重建与不完全血运重建相比,死亡率更低。