Suppr超能文献

无试剂电化学检测构象变化法检测葡萄球菌肠毒素 B

Reagentless detection of staphylococcal enterotoxin B via electrochemical interrogation of conformational changes.

机构信息

Urology, General Hospital Of Eastern Theater Command, Nanjing, China.

Coll Food Sci & Light Ind, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Chirality. 2022 Sep;34(9):1219-1227. doi: 10.1002/chir.23481. Epub 2022 Jun 10.

Abstract

An electrochemical biosensor for staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) detection has been designed on the basis of electrochemical interrogation of conformational changes. Ferrocene-labeled hairpin probe (Fc-HP) and SEB aptamer are introduced for the construction of the platform. Without SEB, the rigid construction of DNA duplex that included SEB aptamer and Fc-HP prevented Fc getting access to the electrode surface, keeping the "eT-off" state in the detection system. In the presence of SEB, the interaction between SEB and the aptamer could trigger the disruption of DNA duplex and the restoration of hairpin structure, accompanied by the increase of Fc oxidation current. The decreasing distance between the redox probe and electrode upon the nucleic acid reconfiguration substantially increased the efficiency of eT, which resulted in the enhanced Fc signal. The proposed strategy presented a wide linear detection range from 0.005 to 100 ng mL with a detection limit down to 3 pg mL (S/N = 3). To investigate the applicability and reliability of the method in real food samples such as milk samples, we compared the results between this method and the commercial ELISA kit. The relative percentage error between the two assays ranged from -6.42% to 6.31%, indicating that there was no obvious difference between the results.

摘要

基于构象变化的电化学检测,设计了一种用于检测葡萄球菌肠毒素 B(SEB)的电化学生物传感器。引入了电化学标记发夹探针(Fc-HP)和 SEB 适体来构建该平台。在没有 SEB 的情况下,包含 SEB 适体和 Fc-HP 的 DNA 双链的刚性结构阻止 Fc 接近电极表面,从而使检测系统保持“eT-off”状态。在 SEB 的存在下,SEB 与适体之间的相互作用可以触发 DNA 双链的破坏和发夹结构的恢复,同时伴随着 Fc 氧化电流的增加。核酸重排后,氧化还原探针和电极之间的距离减小,显著提高了 eT 的效率,从而增强了 Fc 信号。该方法在实际食品样品(如牛奶样品)中的应用和可靠性研究中,我们将该方法与商业 ELISA 试剂盒的结果进行了比较。两种方法之间的相对百分比误差在-6.42%至 6.31%之间,表明结果没有明显差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验