Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Pharmacy Department, Maudsley Hospital, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
J Psychopharmacol. 2023 Mar;37(3):261-267. doi: 10.1177/02698811221099645. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
Intermittent (luteal phase) dosing of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors is one treatment strategy for premenstrual syndromes such as premenstrual dysphoric disorder. This avoids the risk of the antidepressant withdrawal syndrome associated with long-term continuous dosing.
To compare intermittent dosing to continuous dosing in terms of efficacy and acceptability.
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, PubMed and CINAHL for randomised trials of intermittent compared with continuous dosing of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in premenstrual syndromes. We extracted response rates, dropout rates and changes in symptom scores. We used random effects meta-analyses to pool study-level data and calculated odds ratio for dichotomous data and standardised mean difference for continuous data. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020224176).
A total of 1841 references were identified, with eight studies being eligible for analysis, consisting of a total of 460 participants. All included studies provided response rates, six provided dropout rates and five provided symptom scores. There was no statistically significant differences between intermittent and continuous dosing in terms of response rate (odds ratio: 1.0, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.23-4.31, = 71%), dropout rate (odds ratio 1.26, 95% CI: 0.39-4.09, = 33%) or symptom change (standardised mean difference: 0.04, 95% CI: -0.27 to 0.35, = 39%). All studies had a moderate or high risk of bias.
Since intermittent dosing avoids the potential for withdrawal symptoms, it should be considered more commonly in this patient population.
选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂的间歇(黄体期)给药是经前期综合征(如经前期烦躁障碍)的一种治疗策略。这避免了与长期连续给药相关的抗抑郁药戒断综合征的风险。
比较间歇性给药与连续性给药在疗效和可接受性方面的差异。
我们在 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO、PubMed 和 CINAHL 中检索了关于经前期综合征中选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂间歇性与连续性给药比较的随机试验。我们提取了反应率、辍学率和症状评分的变化。我们使用随机效应荟萃分析来汇总研究水平的数据,并计算二分类数据的优势比和连续数据的标准化均数差。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。该研究已在 PROSPERO(CRD42020224176)上注册。
共确定了 1841 篇参考文献,其中 8 项研究符合分析条件,共纳入 460 名参与者。所有纳入的研究均提供了反应率,6 项研究提供了辍学率,5 项研究提供了症状评分。在反应率(优势比:1.0,95%置信区间(CI):0.23-4.31, = 71%)、辍学率(优势比 1.26,95% CI:0.39-4.09, = 33%)或症状变化(标准化均数差:0.04,95% CI:-0.27 至 0.35, = 39%)方面,间歇性和连续性给药之间没有统计学上的显著差异。所有研究均存在中度或高度偏倚风险。
由于间歇性给药避免了戒断症状的潜在风险,因此在该患者群体中应更常考虑使用。