Department of Infectious Diseases, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, Florida, USA.
University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
Subst Use Misuse. 2022;57(9):1374-1382. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2022.2083171. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
The dynamics of injection drug use and higher-risk sexual practices compound the risk of HIV and HCV acquisition. Published literature on people who inject drugs (PWID) has examined risk of infection assuming homogeneity of cohort behavior. Categorizing subgroups by injection and sexual risk can inform a more equitable approach to how syringe services programs (SSPs) adapt harm reduction resources and implementation of evidence-based interventions. We explored injection and sexual risk profiles among PWID to determine significant predictors of class membership.
Data were collected from 1,272 participants at an SSP in Miami-Dade County. Latent Class Analysis (LCA) examined how 10 injection/sexual behavior indicators cluster together to create profiles. Model fit statistics and multivariable multinomial latent class regression identified the optimal class structure and significant predictors of class membership. We assessed SSP visits, naloxone access, HIV/HCV testing and prevalence, and incidence of self-reported wounds.
Three distinct profiles of injection/sexual risk were determined: (9.4%); (18.9%); and (71.7%). Participants reporting gay/bisexual orientation and methamphetamine injection more likely belonged to the LIHS class. LIHS class members had higher prevalence of HIV, while those of HIMS reported increased hepatitis C prevalence. Compared to members of LILS, those of HIMS more likely experienced unstable housing, gay/bisexual orientation, heroin or speedball injection, and identifying as women. HIMS cohort members had more SSP visits, naloxone accessed, and higher wound incidence than those of LILS.
Understanding PWID subgroups amplifies the importance of implementing evidencebased interventions such as PrEP for those engaging in highest risk behavior, with focused interventions of antiretroviral management and access to condoms for members of the LIHS class and HCV screening with wound care for those belonging to HIMS.
注射毒品和高风险性行为的动态增加了 HIV 和 HCV 感染的风险。已发表的关于注射吸毒者(PWID)的文献研究了在假设队列行为同质性的情况下感染的风险。根据注射和性风险对亚组进行分类,可以为更公平地利用注射器服务项目(SSP)来调整减少伤害资源以及实施基于证据的干预措施提供信息。我们探讨了 PWID 的注射和性风险概况,以确定群体归属的显著预测因素。
数据来自迈阿密戴德县的一个 SSP 的 1272 名参与者。潜在类别分析(LCA)研究了 10 个注射/性行为指标如何聚类以创建特征。模型拟合统计和多变量多项潜在类别回归确定了最佳的类别结构和群体归属的显著预测因素。我们评估了 SSP 访问、纳洛酮获取、HIV/HCV 检测和流行率,以及自我报告伤口的发生率。
确定了三种不同的注射/性行为风险特征:(9.4%);(18.9%);和(71.7%)。报告同性恋/双性恋倾向和使用甲基苯丙胺注射的参与者更有可能属于 LIHS 类别。LIHS 类别的 HIV 流行率较高,而 HIMS 类别的丙型肝炎流行率较高。与 LILS 类别的成员相比,HIMS 类别的成员更有可能经历不稳定的住房、同性恋/双性恋倾向、海洛因或摇头丸注射,以及自我认同为女性。与 LILS 类别的成员相比,HIMS 类别的成员接受 SSP 访问、纳洛酮获取以及伤口发生率更高。
了解 PWID 亚组,增强了为那些从事高风险行为的人实施基于证据的干预措施的重要性,针对最高风险行为者实施 PrEP,针对 LIHS 类别的成员实施抗病毒管理和安全套干预,以及针对 HIMS 类别的成员实施 HCV 筛查和伤口护理。